Canada Kicks Ass
The "Stella" Awards - American Justice

REPLY

1  2  Next



Jonny_C @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:48 pm

Got this from a friend by email. Apologies if it's been posted before. It fits in the "Too unbelievable to be true" category, yet this is American law suits we're dealing with here, so anything is possible! ...................

Stella Awards


It's time again for the annual Stella Awards. For those unfamiliar with these awards, they are named after 81-year-old Stella Liebeck who spilled hot coffee on herself and successfully sued the McDonald's in New Mexico , where she purchased coffee. You remember, she took the lid off the coffee and put it between her knees while she was driving. Who would ever think one could get burned doing that, right? That's right; these are awards for the most outlandish lawsuits and verdicts in the U.S. You know, the kinds of cases that make you scratch your head and say What The �.. So keep your head scratcher handy.

Here are the Stellas for the past year:

*SEVENTH PLACE*

Kathleen Robertson of Austin, Texas, was awarded $80,000 by a jury of her peers after breaking her ankle tripping over a toddler who was running inside a furniture store. The store owners were understandably surprised by the verdict, considering the running toddler was her own son

Start scratching!

* SIXTH PLACE *

Carl Truman, 19, of Los Angeles , California , won $74,000 plus medical expenses when his neighbor ran over his hand with a Honda Accord. Truman apparently didn't notice there was someone at the wheel of the car when he was trying to steal his neighbor's hubcaps.

Scratch some more...

* FIFTH PLACE *

Terrence Dickson, of Bristol , Pennsylvania , who was leaving a house he had just burglarized by way of the garage. Unfortunately for Dickson, the automatic garage door opener malfunctioned and he could not get the garage door to open. Worse, he couldn't re-enter the house because the door connecting the garage to the house locked when Dickson pulled it shut. Forced to sit for eight, count 'em, EIGHT days and survive on a case of Pepsi and a large bag of dry dog food, he sued the homeowner's insurance company claiming undue mental anguish. Amazingly, the jury said the insurance company must pay Dickson $500,000 for his anguish. We should all have this kind of anguish. Keep scratching .. There are more......

Double hand scratching after this one.....

* FOURTH PLACE *

Jerry Williams, of Little Rock, Arkansas, garnered 4th Place in the Stella's when he was awarded $14,500 plus medical expenses after being bitten on the butt by his next door neighbor's beagle - even though the beagle was on a chain in its owner's fenced yard. Williams did not get as much as he asked for because the jury believed the beagle might have been provoked at the time of the butt bite because Williams had climbed over the fence into the yard and repeatedly shot the dog with a pellet gun.

Pick a new spot to scratch, you're getting a bald spot..

* THIRD PLACE *

Amber Carson of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, because a jury ordered a Philadelphia restaurant to pay her $113,500 after she slipped on a spilled soft drink and broke her tailbone. The reason the soft drink was on the floor: Ms. Carson had thrown it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier during an argument.

Only two more so ease up on the scratching....

*SECOND PLACE*

Kara Walton, of Claymont , Delaware , sued the owner of a night club in a nearby city because she fell from the bathroom window to the floor, knocking out her two front teeth. Even though Ms.Walton was trying to sneak through the ladies room window to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge, the jury said the night club had to pay her $12,000 ..... oh, yeah, plus dental expenses.

OK. Here we go!!
* FIRST PLACE *

This year's runaway First Place Stella Award winner was: Mrs. Merv Grazinski, of Oklahoma City , Oklahoma , who purchased new 32-foot Winnebago motor home. On her first trip home, from an OU football game, having driven on to the freeway, she set the cruise control at 70 mph and calmly left the driver's seat to go to the back of the Winnebago to make herself a sandwich. Not surprisingly, the motor home left the freeway, crashed and overturned. Also not surprisingly, Mrs. Grazinski sued Winnebago for not putting in the owner's manual that she couldn't actually leave the driver's seat while the cruise control was set. The Oklahoma jury awarded her - are you sitting down? --- $1,750,000 PLUS a new motor home. Winnebago actually changed their manuals as a result of this suit, just in case Mrs. Grazinski has any relatives who might also buy a motor home.

   



Unsound @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:12 pm

I do believe the right-wingers may be atleast a little right when they talk tort reform.

   



Gunnair @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:20 pm

Snopes disbelieves.

   



raydan @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:55 pm

All fake, but still funny.

   



Gunnair @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:35 pm

Calling absolute bullshit on third degree burns from coffee.

Come on...

   



Lemmy @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:17 pm

Why? What caused the injury if not the coffee?

   



Gunnair @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:19 pm

Lemmy Lemmy:
Why? What caused the injury if not the coffee?


Her spilling it?

   



Lemmy @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:25 pm

What if she'd drank it instead? Learn about the case instead of speculating.

   



Gunnair @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:27 pm

Lemmy Lemmy:
What if she'd drank it instead? Learn about the case instead of speculating.


I read up on it. She spilled coffee on her and sued Macdonald. Wonder why she didn't sue the cotton weavers as well.

Frivolous and absolute denial of personal responsibility. Point?

   



Lemmy @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:32 pm

Maybe because the cotton weavers weren't negligent. She was ruled partly at fault (20%, if I recall) for spilling. 80% of the contributory negligence was due to the temperature of the beverage, which would have injured her even more badly if she'd drank it. It's actually a good thing for her that she spilled it instead of drinking it.

Watch the documentary. If you still think that it was her fault I'd be very surprised.

   



Gunnair @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:34 pm

Lemmy Lemmy:
Maybe because the cotton weavers weren't negligent. She was ruled partly at fault (20%, if I recall) for spilling. 80% of the contributory negligence was due to the temperature of the beverage, which would have injured her even more badly if she'd drank it. It's actually a good thing for her that she spilled it instead of drinking it.

Watch the documentary. If you still think that it was her fault I'd be very surprised.


That she put a cup of hot coffee between her legs and she got burned....yeah. She's at fault.

Pour a cup of gasoline on you and strike a match just to have an equal level of surprise at the outcome.

   



Lemmy @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:36 pm

Sorry, but you don't know what you're talking about. You're arguing from emotion and preconceived notion instead of facts and understanding.

   



Gunnair @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:40 pm

Lemmy Lemmy:
Sorry, but you don't know what you're talking about. You're arguing from emotion and preconceived notion instead of facts and understanding.


Maybe, maybe not. If by disagreeing with the outcome makes me wrong, I would wonder why you bother referencing it other than to fish for those who disagree for the purpose of exercising some kind of perverse and silly superiority complex.

   



Lemmy @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:44 pm

Gunnair Gunnair:
Maybe, maybe not. If by disagreeing with the outcome makes me wrong, I would wonder why you bother referencing it other than to fish for those who disagree for the purpose of exercising some kind of perverse and silly superiority complex.

Yeah, that's it exactly. Carry on.

   



Gunnair @ Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:46 pm

Lemmy Lemmy:
Gunnair Gunnair:
Maybe, maybe not. If by disagreeing with the outcome makes me wrong, I would wonder why you bother referencing it other than to fish for those who disagree for the purpose of exercising some kind of perverse and silly superiority complex.

Yeah, that's it exactly. Carry on.


Figured as much.

   



REPLY

1  2  Next