Canada Kicks Ass
Antartica ice melting faster than previously thought

REPLY

1  2  3  4  5 ... 47  Next



Omega @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:05 am

Antarctic Ice Thawing Faster Than Predicted

Alister Doyle, Reuters
August 22, 2007


NY ALESUND, Norway - A thaw of Antarctic ice is outpacing predictions by the U.N. climate panel and could in the worst case drive up world sea levels by 2 meters (6 ft) by 2100, a leading expert said on Wednesday.

Millions of people, from Bangladesh to Florida and some Pacific island states, live less than a meter above sea level. Most of the world's major cities, from Shanghai to Buenos Aires, are by the sea.

Chris Rapley, the outgoing head of the British Antarctic Survey, said there were worrying signs of accelerating flows of ice towards the ocean from both Antarctica and Greenland with little sign of more snow falling inland to compensate.

"The ice is moving faster both in Greenland and in the Antarctic than the glaciologists had believed would happen," Rapley told Reuters during a climate seminar in Ny Alesund on a Norwegian Arctic island 1,200 km from the North Pole.

"I think the realistic view is that we will be nearer a meter than the 40 cm" in sea level rise by 2100, Raply said. The U.N. climate panel in February gave a likely range of 18 to 59 cm this century, for an average around 40 cm.

Asked at the seminar what the upper limit for the rise might be at a probability of one percent or less, he said: "At this extremely unlikely level the maximum would be two meters."

Skeptics often dismiss such low probabilities as scaremongering. But many scientists note that people take precautions such as to insure their homes against far lower risks, such as fire.

HIMALAYAS

The U.N. panel said that rising temperatures due to more and more greenhouse gases from human activities led by use of fossil fuels were melting ice.

Antarctica stores enough ice to raise ocean levels by about 57 meters if it ever all melted. Greenland has about 7 meters, according to U.N. data.

All other glaciers on land, from the Norwegian Arctic to the Himalayas, are tiny by comparison and contain only enough ice combined to raise sea levels by about 15-37 cm.

Glaciers around Ny Alesund, which calls itself the world's most northerly settlement, are also retreating fast.

The U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in February hedged its forecasts by saying that "larger values cannot be excluded" but said there was too little understanding of how ice sheets react if water seeps beneath them and lubricates their slide.

Rapley said there were worrying signs of an accelerating thaw both in West Antarctica, where much of the ice sits on rocks that are below sea level, and on the Cook and Totten glaciers on the fringe of the far bigger ice mass to the East.

"The East Antarctic ice sheet is always dismissed as the big bit which sits on rock above sea level and so is much more stable. But the radar altimeters show significant discharge going on," he said.

http://www.enn.com/climate/article/22168

   



Blue_Nose @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:48 am

JetBoy JetBoy:
Asked at the seminar what the upper limit for the rise might be at a probability of one percent or less, he said: "At this extremely unlikely level the maximum would be two meters."
It's questions like this that annoy me, especially when that "upper limit" is used to open supposedly scientific articles.

   



Brenda @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:52 am

2 meters ain't 6 ft.
6 ft is 1.829 meters. 2 meters is 6.562 ft. Huge difference!

   



hwacker @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:53 am

"U.N. climate panel"

Yeah ok, call me when somebody else really has a report.

   



sasquatch2 @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:54 pm

Yeah well perhaps these "experts" should explain why the sky did not catch fire in the 30's and Antarctic didn't melt then.

These guys are obviously unaware that Steve McIntyre ripped apart the very basis of their BS---the NASA temperatures.

This whole study is based on the assumption that it is indeed getting warmer at an accelerated rate...which is now very doubtful.

In a reverse of the alarmist accusations of "BIG_OIL financed deniers" how much were these experts bribed by the IPCC with our money?

   



Omega @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 1:56 pm

I would think this isn't based on just computer model projections but actual measurements and observation.

Does anyone have information on how much the average sea level has risen thus far?

   



PluggyRug @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:02 pm

well...if all the ice is disappearing we need to place a ban on ice fishing.

   



BartSimpson @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:04 pm

Brenda Brenda:
2 meters ain't 6 ft.
6 ft is 1.829 meters. 2 meters is 6.562 ft. Huge difference!


True. I'm two meters tall and those who are merely six feet tall don't like it when I stand in their view.

Although they do like to stand in my shadow on hot days. :?

   



BartSimpson @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:07 pm

And, omigosh!, the ice has been melting EVERYWHERE!!!!

Look what North America used to look like before Global Warming started its evil onslaught of temperate weather!

Image


It's just AWFUL that Quebec & Ontario aren't buried under a beautiful and fragile sheet of ice!

   



Omega @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:11 pm

BartSimpson BartSimpson:
It's just AWFUL that Quebec & Ontario aren't buried under a beautiful and fragile sheet of ice!

Tell that to people living on the coasts.

   



BartSimpson @ Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:25 pm

JetBoy JetBoy:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
It's just AWFUL that Quebec & Ontario aren't buried under a beautiful and fragile sheet of ice!

Tell that to people living on the coasts.


Sea level would be lower if those beautiful continental ice sheets were restored and the people on the coasts would enjoy more usable land. Perhaps I should tell them this good news!

   



Omega @ Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:09 am

BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Sea level would be lower if those beautiful continental ice sheets were restored and the people on the coasts would enjoy more usable land. Perhaps I should tell them this good news!

It's better things stay the way they are because if things change we'd have a lot of restructuring to do.

   



ziggy @ Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:13 am

JetBoy JetBoy:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Sea level would be lower if those beautiful continental ice sheets were restored and the people on the coasts would enjoy more usable land. Perhaps I should tell them this good news!

It's better things stay the way they are because if things change we'd have a lot of restructuring to do.
Sorry but if mother nature wants to change you dont have much of a say in it.

   



Omega @ Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:15 am

ziggy ziggy:
Sorry but if mother nature wants to change you dont have much of a say in it.


No, but we have a say on our own impact on the climate.

   



ziggy @ Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:17 am

JetBoy JetBoy:
ziggy ziggy:
Sorry but if mother nature wants to change you dont have much of a say in it.


No, but we have a say on our own impact on the climate.
Were not responsible for global climate change,its a natural cycle.

   



REPLY

1  2  3  4  5 ... 47  Next