Canada Kicks Ass
Snowflake Dilemma

REPLY

1  2  3  4  Next



PluggyRug @ Sat Dec 09, 2017 2:52 pm

What's the definition of irony again? ROTFL

A new survey reveals that young people believe being called a “snowflake” could be damaging to their mental health.

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/12/0 ... al-health/

   



housewife @ Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:13 pm

Maybe the real question is why it went on to say that young people were more likely to experience mental health issues than older people. Maybe we should bring back the sticks and stones rhythm

   



Vbeacher @ Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:36 pm

housewife housewife:
Maybe the real question is why it went on to say that young people were more likely to experience mental health issues than older people.


Because they're snowflakes?

   



BRAH @ Sat Dec 09, 2017 6:00 pm

Millennial Snowflakes are Canada's future leaders, GOD HELP US!

   



Tricks @ Sat Dec 09, 2017 8:50 pm

Yeah your generations have done a bang up job ROTFL

   



martin14 @ Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:04 pm

Tricks Tricks:
Yeah your generations have done a bang up job ROTFL


This is true, they were way too soft.

   



Thanos @ Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:31 pm

Tricks Tricks:
Yeah your generations have done a bang up job ROTFL


Gen X, Gen Y, and Millenials have a fairly good relationship for the most part. Comes from the common experience of all of us in that age range of getting royally ass-raped by the Boomers when it comes to jobs and economic well-being.

   



BRAH @ Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:25 pm

Tricks Tricks:
Yeah your generations have done a bang up job ROTFL


__________________

We Rocked!

   



Freakinoldguy @ Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:42 pm

Boomers: The Real Greatest Generation

$1:
It makes the headlines nearly every day, and the tone is usually resentful: Beware of those soon-to-retire baby boomers, all 80 million of them, who are about to place a huge burden on the rest of us. The first of this whiny, entitled generation are turning 60 this year, and they'll be demanding even more special treatment in old age than they've gotten the rest of their lives.

But imagine if the generation getting ready to retire wasn't the baby boomers, but the World War II generation -- or the Greatest Generation, as it's popularly lionized. No one would be calling those Americans a burden or a drag. If they were retiring today, we'd be writing columns full of praise for their sacrifice and discussing what our nation owes them and how it's our moral duty to support them.

Why the different attitudes toward these two generations? Why is one idealized as heroic and giving, while the other is disdained as self-indulgent and taking? It's time to reassess. The true test of a generation should be what it's done to make America better. And in that regard, boomers have an important story to tell. It's a story about a more inclusive and tolerant America, about women's equality and men's growing respect for it, about an appreciation for cultural diversity too long denied, about a society that no longer turns a blind eye to prejudice or pollution.

The boomers' problem is not that they haven't accomplished a great deal; it's that we take their accomplishments for granted and don't give them any credit. But if we look more closely at the legacies of both the boomers and their parents, we might see that the boomers are a far more consequential group than many admit. We might see, in fact, that they have advanced American values in ways the Greatest Generation refused to do.

Today, no one questions what the World War II generation gave to America, and that's as it should be. Its members sacrificed their lives and futures to defend our country. They were heroes then, and they deserve our continuing gratitude. But the reality few acknowledge is that, mission accomplished, they returned home to preside, by and large without complaint, over an American society vastly inferior to the one we know today.

Our view of the 1950s is clouded by nostalgia. We have a Norman Rockwell image of that era, one of tightknit neighborhoods and white picket fences. But for too many Americans, this was no golden age. In the storied years of the 1950s, we told women to stay home, blacks to stay separate, gays to stay closeted, Jews to stay inconspicuous, and those who didn't conform or prayed to a different God to feel ashamed and stay silent.

Greatest Generation blacks who fought Hitler were forced to sit behind German POWs at USO concerts, and when they returned home the new suburban neighborhoods -- emblems of the American Dream -- were closed to them. Even baseball great Willie Mays couldn't find a house to buy when the Giants moved from New York to San Francisco in 1957 -- until the mayor intervened. Just as Jews anglicized names and decorated Christmas trees to fit in, blacks tried to straighten their hair and bleach their skin by using fiery, painful chemical products with names such as Black-No-More. For them there was nothing warm or nurturing about that era.

It was a time when men with beards seemed subversive and women in pants were questioned by police, and when the Organization Man ruled the workplace. Children thought to be gay were sent off for psychiatric treatment and even electroshock therapy. As for those who spoke up for the environment, they were irritants in a nation that was on the march and viewed smog alerts and clouds of soot as simply the price of progress.

Women of that era found themselves trapped in an apron. Want ads were segregated by sex -- a practice The Washington Post didn't end until 1971 -- and it wasn't unusual for a description of the perfect "girl" to be "5-foot-5 to 5-foot-7 in heels." Judges ridiculed female attorneys as "lawyerettes" in court. A woman's job didn't count for much, as credit bureaus typically denied women their economic independence.

The Greatest Generation largely accepted and defended this status quo. Even in the 1990s, polls showed Greatest Generation majorities continuing to resist racial intermarriage, working mothers and laws to protect gays from discrimination. Through the late 1980s, a majority of white respondents in national polls even said they would vote for a law allowing a homeowner to refuse to sell his home to a black buyer.

In other words, if most Greatest Generation Americans had their way, American life would have remained frozen in the '50s. They were not the agents of change that built the far more inclusive, tolerant, free and equal America we have today.

That task fell to the boomers, who almost immediately started breaking down the restrictive codes and repressive convictions of the Greatest Generation's era. From the moment pollsters began recording their attitudes in the 1960s, boomers stood diametrically opposed to their elders on the core issues of race, women, religious pluralism, homosexuality and environmental protection. They saw an America that was not living up to its ideals, and they set about to change it.

But this is a story that rarely gets told. In part that's because the media prefer the dramatic or the epic, which leaves out a great deal of social change. In part it's because we remain fixated on the '60s, as if boomer history ended there. Yet nearly four decades have passed since the '60s ended, and the ways in which America has changed are so far-reaching and fundamental that they have transformed how we live as profoundly as any war or New Deal.

Today, we see minorities and women contributing to society in ways that would have been unimaginable just a few decades ago. Diversity and pluralism are now moral values, bigotry and sexual harassment no longer get a free pass, and ethnic boundaries once considered impermeable are breaking down in media, society and personal relationships. Half of all teens now report dating across racial and ethnic lines -- and 90 percent say their parents have no problem with it.

Discrimination against gays? Increasingly prohibited. Domestic partner benefits? Increasingly accepted. Men sharing housework and child care duties? No more raised eyebrows. Toxic runoffs and belching smokestacks? No longer tolerated. The command and control workplace? On its way out.

So natural and comfortable are these new norms that most of us take them for granted, as if it's always been this way. Because we live in a changed America, we tend to forget what it was like before boomers agitated for change.

Boomer-bashing has become a virtual cottage industry. They're labeled "the worst generation." They're accused of infantilism and self-promotion. One Web site described them as "a plague of self-centered locusts."

Part of what drives this vitriol is an implied criticism that boomers are soft and overindulged because they never sacrificed in a Great War or Depression. But millions of boomers fought bravely in a war their parents handed them, and millions more risked arrest, uncertainty and ostracism for protesting what they believed to be the pointlessness and duplicity of that war. There's no reason to believe that boomers wouldn't have fought Hitler as nobly as their parents did, and boomer antiwar protesters said as much at the time, distinguishing between what they saw as the just and necessary war against fascism and the misguided, deceptive and morally ambiguous war in Vietnam.

As for the well-worn condemnation of boomer materialism, the truth is that materialism is nothing new in America, and boomers are far from the first and only generation to face this charge: It was conspicuous consumption in the 1920s and keeping up with the Joneses in the '50s.

Boomers certainly haven't solved all of society's problems, and they've created a few as well. But if we held the World War II generation to the same standard, the word "greatest" would never come to mind. Even if we're not a perfect America today, in so many ways we're a better America. And for that, we owe the baby boomers our thanks.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 491_2.html

If this latest generation can raise their heads from your phones long enough to see the world around them maybe, just maybe they can leave a lasting positive legacy to. But, if that ever happens they, like the boomers shouldn't expect to be thanked for it, they should expect to be vilified because of it.

   



Thanos @ Sun Dec 10, 2017 12:00 am

Written in 2006, before the Wall Street meltdown caused by right-wing Boomer economic policies wiped out the savings of the generations following them and cost millions of people their jobs and homes. And written well before 2016, when a choice between two utterly repellent Boomer presidential candidates forced the entire world to endure the single worst person, another Boomer himself by the way, to ever become President of the United States. Voted in overwhelmingly, also by the way, by other Boomers. Yeah, not much thanks are owed to these people anymore (if any thanks were ever owed to them to begin with), not when the unending cascade of their fucked-up decision making process has done more than any other generation before them to wreck as much of the world as they possibly could for others.

   



Tricks @ Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:34 am

ROTFL Image

   



housewife @ Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:43 am

Vbeacher Vbeacher:
housewife housewife:
Maybe the real question is why it went on to say that young people were more likely to experience mental health issues than older people.


Because they're snowflakes?


ROTFL

   



housewife @ Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:57 am

http://mentalfloss.com/article/52209/15 ... everything

It’s not a new thing every generation has something to say about the new generation.

Also I think something is wrong with the space time continuum google actually gave me something on the first try. That never happens.

   



PluggyRug @ Sun Dec 10, 2017 11:57 am

On a similar theme....Are not universities supposed to be bastions of free speech...

https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10251

   



Thanos @ Sun Dec 10, 2017 12:57 pm

The Boomers were plenty intolerant themselves in the 1960's and 70's when they kept burning down ROTC offices and trashing admin offices during sit-ins. That's where the tradition of caving in to student whiners began, with admin giving into Boomer protests just so they could get the daily university business done without interruption.

   



REPLY

1  2  3  4  Next