400-year-old skeleton of aboriginal woman found in Sarnia ba
Newsbot @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 1:30 pm
Title: 400-year-old skeleton of aboriginal woman found in Sarnia backyard costs couple $5,000
Category: History
Posted By: commanderkai
Date: 2013-06-18 13:07:46
Canadian
commanderkai @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 1:30 pm
Wow, that sucks. These Canadians discover an archeological find, and report it to the proper authorities, and they have to pay such a huge amount of money for it? That's not right. They did the right thing to report it, expanding our heritage and knowledge about Canada's history, and they get penalized for it.
Pretty sad.
BartSimpson @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 1:42 pm
commanderkai commanderkai:
Wow, that sucks. These Canadians discover an archeological find, and report it to the proper authorities, and they have to pay such a huge amount of money for it? That's not right. They did the right thing to report it, expanding our heritage and knowledge about Canada's history, and they get penalized for it.
Pretty sad.
Pretty sad.
The next such discovery will be properly destroyed and obliterated because of this dick move by the 'proper authorities'. Thanks, morons.
![[B-o]](./images/smilies/drinkup.gif "Drink up")
BartSimpson @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 1:45 pm
$1:
Spence told the Star that the skeleton was that of a woman who was about 24 years old when she died, probably in the late 1500s or early 1600s.
How'd they know she was 24? Why not 'mid-twenties'?
raydan @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 1:47 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
$1:
Spence told the Star that the skeleton was that of a woman who was about 24 years old when she died, probably in the late 1500s or early 1600s.
How'd they know she was 24? Why not 'mid-twenties'?
Health insurance card.
Robair @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:15 pm
I generally try to keep backyard skeletons under wraps.
ShepherdsDog @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:45 pm
there are plenty of such finds that go unreported when excavations are being done.....can't have a few ancient bones or artifacts holding up modern progress and construction projects 
ShepherdsDog @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:46 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
$1:
Spence told the Star that the skeleton was that of a woman who was about 24 years old when she died, probably in the late 1500s or early 1600s.
How'd they know she was 24? Why not 'mid-twenties'?
was ray hitting on the remains?
BartSimpson @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:38 pm
Robair Robair:
I generally try to keep backyard skeletons under wraps.
I generally try to keep skeletons in someone else's backyard.
BartSimpson @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:38 pm
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
$1:
Spence told the Star that the skeleton was that of a woman who was about 24 years old when she died, probably in the late 1500s or early 1600s.
How'd they know she was 24? Why not 'mid-twenties'?
was ray hitting on the remains?
Brenda @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:10 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
$1:
Spence told the Star that the skeleton was that of a woman who was about 24 years old when she died, probably in the late 1500s or early 1600s.
How'd they know she was 24? Why not 'mid-twenties'?
They can tell how old she was, but not in what century?
fifeboy @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:13 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Robair Robair:
I generally try to keep backyard skeletons under wraps.
I generally try to keep skeletons in someone else's backyard.
Not in your closet?
Brenda @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:27 pm
fifeboy fifeboy:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Robair Robair:
I generally try to keep backyard skeletons under wraps.
I generally try to keep skeletons in someone else's backyard.
Not in your closet?
That's where he put his closet
BartSimpson @ Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:33 pm
fifeboy fifeboy:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
I generally try to keep skeletons in someone else's backyard.
Not in your closet?
I just did a project in the house where I lined all of the closets with cedar. Musty old skeletons would kind of mess up the entire effort.