Man sues pizzeria for injuries during robbery attempt
Newsbot @ Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:22 am
Title: Man sues pizzeria for injuries during robbery attempt
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: GreenTiger
Date: 2014-07-22 05:15:33
GreenTiger @ Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:22 am
What a pathetic idiot.
There are certan organizations where if he attempted to rob them he would simpy disappear. They would do a lot more than pour hot soup on him.
What a colossal waste of tax money to all ow this legal bullshit to go on.
BartSimpson @ Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:09 am
MEMO: If you shoot and kill armed robbers they can't sue you afterwards.
DrCaleb @ Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:19 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
MEMO: If you shoot and kill armed robbers they can't sue you afterwards.
"If he's good enough to shoot once, he's good enough to shoot twice."
BartSimpson @ Tue Jul 22, 2014 11:57 am
![[B-o]](./images/smilies/drinkup.gif "Drink up")
raydan @ Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:50 pm
The pizzeria should conter-sue him for time lost by the employees, lost revenues during the robbery attempt, emotional distress... etc. etc. etc. Ad nauseam and etc. again.
andyt @ Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:59 pm
Sue him for what? He didn't succeed in the robbery, so he's got no money to be sued for. The case should just be dismissed.
Strutz @ Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:38 pm
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
MEMO: If you shoot and kill armed robbers they can't sue you afterwards.
"If he's good enough to shoot once, he's good enough to shoot twice."
LOL. That reminded me of this
Tresspassing.jpg
Back to subject though... toss the case. Suck it up sunshine.
QBall @ Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:16 am
I dread the day I get called up for jury duty. The only solace I take is that the case I have to sit for is one like this where I can have the pleasure of getting up before the court and say, "Your honour, we find the plaintiff to be a fucking douche. We rule in favour of the respondents." Of course only a moron would ask for a jury in this case, as opposed to having just a judge hear the case.
GreenTiger @ Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:21 pm
QBall QBall:
I dread the day I get called up for jury duty. The only solace I take is that the case I have to sit for is one like this where I can have the pleasure of getting up before the court and say, "Your honour, we find the plaintiff to be a fucking douche. We rule in favour of the respondents." Of course only a moron would ask for a jury in this case, as opposed to having just a judge hear the case.
I've been called for jury in September and I do hope for a case like this for the same reason.
rickc @ Wed Jul 23, 2014 2:09 pm
QBall QBall:
I dread the day I get called up for jury duty. The only solace I take is that the case I have to sit for is one like this where I can have the pleasure of getting up before the court and say, "Your honour, we find the plaintiff to be a fucking douche. We rule in favour of the respondents." Of course only a moron would ask for a jury in this case, as opposed to having just a judge hear the case.
I think the real douche in this case is the judge for allowing this case to see the inside of a courtroom in the first place. Talk about a waste of time and money.
BRAH @ Wed Jul 23, 2014 2:16 pm
What kind of scumbag Lawyer would take this case?
GreenTiger @ Wed Jul 23, 2014 7:00 pm
BRAH BRAH:
What kind of scumbag Lawyer would take this case?
A Scumbag lawyer.
BRAH @ Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:04 pm
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
BRAH BRAH:
What kind of scumbag Lawyer would take this case?
A Scumbag lawyer.
llama66 @ Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:03 pm
