Canada Kicks Ass
Where are the Canadian Action Party supporters?

REPLY

1  2  Next



MidianKnight @ Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:32 pm

HELL-o once again, comrades (and clay pigeons, too) :twisted:

According to the results I read from the last Federal election, me and 264 other people in the Calgary area voted for the Canadian Action Party. So where the Hell are y'all? Also, how about Green Party and NDP voters/supporters? (there are four of those latter on this forum at last count...) Anyone else even remotely progressive/liberal minded, and especially those who stand against the craven sell-out/Americanisation of our once-proud, independent country and all it stands (stood?) for: c'mon mates, poke your heads up, don't be shy...we clearly are blessed with what the military boys might call a "target-rich environment" here...

I have returned, and I haven't even yet begun..... [bash]

Your o'b'dnt and f'th'f'l servant:

His Imperial Majesty, the Emperor of Socialist/Liberal/Pinko Fucktards :twisted:

"No thanks, we'd rather be Canadian." (Paul Hellyer)

   



Canadian_Mind @ Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:54 pm

I support policies from all perties. I like CAP because they wanna scrap Nafta and regain government contol of the national bank.

As for Americanisation of Canada, its actually been the opposite. A disproportionately large amount of superstar athletes, musicans, hollywood actors, and members of other aspects of "american culture" are actually Canadians.

   



grainfedprairieboy @ Thu Mar 29, 2007 8:00 pm

In mental institutions?

Do I have enough points for a tank now?

   



Scape @ Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:59 pm

I ran as Cap in 04. Got 141 votes in my riding.

   



Mr_Canada old @ Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:35 pm

Scape Scape:
I ran as Cap in 04. Got 141 votes in my riding.
[?] What?!

   



Banff @ Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:10 am

:?: it might be worth a look into , it couldn't be any worse than decades of disfunctional cons and libs. Libs = social everything , Cons = all taxes should go to corporate/business/farming/etc only (liberally) The green party is a bit to green , I can't seem to get the grass stains off of my carpet from the bottom of my shoes ...

   



DrCaleb @ Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:31 am

Banff Banff:
:?: it might be worth a look into , it couldn't be any worse than decades of disfunctional cons and libs.


Actually, the infighting happening in the party right now is quite disheartening. Get rid of Connie Fogal, and they might have a better chance.

   



hurley_108 @ Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:37 am

Scape Scape:
I ran as Cap in 04. Got 141 votes in my riding.


Is your name Shawn?

   



Scape @ Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:39 am

DrCaleb DrCaleb:
Banff Banff:
:?: it might be worth a look into , it couldn't be any worse than decades of disfunctional cons and libs.


Actually, the infighting happening in the party right now is quite disheartening. Get rid of Connie Fogal, and they might have a better chance.


I agree but the CAP is too far gone now for that. No sense crying over spilt milk but I would rather have a clear option for a pro-Canada party on the ballot. One that isn't afraid of challenging NAFTA and doing something more than providing lip service. I see none on the ballot that fit that so I am left with lesser evils.

   



Scape @ Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:40 am

I see someone knows how to google.

   



hurley_108 @ Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:45 am

Sorry, couldn't resist trying. Good on ya, mate! I wonder how many other people here have run. I haven't. I've dreamed about it once or twice, but I donno if I could find the time.

   



Clogeroo @ Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:30 am

CAP is interesting although I find them a bit hypocritical. They talk about other countries and what has happened to their societies and how fear controls them yet they almost use fear themselves as a tool to make you feel afraid for our country's sake and for our people's sake.

Is NAFTA really the worst thing going? It has downsides but for Canada it has given us a significant boost to our economy and efficiency. I guess their concern is when integration will end and maybe wish to stop it, which is fair, but they almost go about it the wrong way. Using conspiracy type accusations or their own fear mongering makes their cause not appear even that legitimate and what they would impose over us might not be much better much like the Soviet Union was not much better than their old Kingdom. Although instead of overthrowing the Tsar they almost want to overthrow the CEO. :P They are also almost against the centralisation of North America yet when it comes to our own country they are more enthusiastically for it.

It is just another party who tries to argue they are the better ones when in fact they really are not.

   



Zipperfish @ Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:43 am

Clogeroo Clogeroo:

It is just another party who tries to argue they are the better ones when in fact they really are not.


What else are you going to argue? "Don't vote for us because we're not the best party."? Maybe you should start that one Clog. Let me know how it goes. I've even gotta name for it: The LOSER Party.

ROTFL

Sorry, man but you set yourself up for these--you really do.

   



MidianKnight @ Sat Mar 31, 2007 3:34 pm

Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind:
I support policies from all perties. I like CAP because they wanna scrap Nafta and regain government contol of the national bank.

As for Americanisation of Canada, its actually been the opposite. A disproportionately large amount of superstar athletes, musicans, hollywood actors, and members of other aspects of "american culture" are actually Canadians.


The Americanisation to which I refer has been the near-constant (since ~late 1980s) sell-out of our industries, resources, and our control over same, aided and abetted by our main banks, ever since Brian Buffooney--er, I mean Mulroney--dissolved the FIRA (Foreign Investment Review Agency) and handed control of our monetary sovereignty (among basically every other type of sovereingty) to the banks with the Bank of Canada Act of 1991, which eliminated, among other things, mandatory cash reserves. Canada is now basically a "branch-plant" economy of the (mostly) American corporations that own it. That's why we want to scrap NAFTA...Once you turn the TV or stereo off, what do "superstar athletes, musicians,...etc" matter in the real world? Yeah, I thought so...I also think all these people might have less reason to leave Canada if Canada was more than a 2nd-rate Yankee client state, no?

Canada, Canada's resources, and Canada's people for Canada, not Amerikkka (or anyone else)...anyone that doesn't want to contribute to our nation, knows perfectly well where the border is. Anyone that wants to be American that bad: why don't you go move there??!!! I figure most of these craven little bootlickers might last maybe 6 months...

Fun fact: One of the terms of NAFTA is that Canada is forbidden to maintain her own oil/gas reserves without first selling--I can't remember if it's 50 or 60%--of same to America for cut-rate prices...Good ole' Brian signed this. What other rational explanation is there for this but that he was Amerikkka's bought-and-paid-for "stalking horse?", probably right from day 1?

   



MidianKnight @ Sat Mar 31, 2007 3:36 pm

DrCaleb DrCaleb:
Banff Banff:
:?: it might be worth a look into , it couldn't be any worse than decades of disfunctional cons and libs.


Actually, the infighting happening in the party right now is quite disheartening. Get rid of Connie Fogal, and they might have a better chance.


No, she hasn't really impressed me either; but then, the Paul Hellyers of this world don't come around too often, do they.

   



REPLY

1  2  Next