A United North America is just around the corner
tritium @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:48 pm
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
Robodoon Robodoon:
Thats an elite lie. The Earth is not over populated. You can fit the entire population into one US state with room to spare.
Rhode Island, for example. But they have to be stacked 5 people high. Or Alaska, but try to get any work done in that crowd on the mountaintop.
Robodoon Robodoon:
The Elites got hold of the education system long ago, and they started teaching that we were over populated, but we are not.
Yes, that bloody Illuminati named Malthus started it.
Robodoon Robodoon:
And the elites are planning to kill most of the Earths population off.
Yes, there will be a terrible battle . .
Robodoon Robodoon:
Specially the Monotheists who they say aren't compatible with their global government system.
. . .using secret alien technology that targets people based on political ideology.
Robodoon Robodoon:
What if they decide that you and your family need to die?
That's a conversation that can only end in gunshots.
Fucking 10.
Robodoon @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:55 pm
tritium tritium:
Oh great. Robodoon the forums new CTist. 
They aren't Theories.
Arctic_Menace @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:58 pm
$1:
Mex don't want to be part of yankeeland, you see them coming across the Rio Grande. Time to give head a shake.
Because it's the cheap Mexican way of taking back what was theirs in the first place.
Arctic_Menace @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:06 pm
$1:
Thats an elite lie. The Earth is not over populated. You can fit the entire population into one US state with room to spare.
The Elites got hold of the education system long ago, and they started teaching that we were over populated, but we are not.
And the elites are planning to kill most of the Earths population off.
Specially the Monotheists who they say aren't compatible with their global government system.
The Elites got hold of the education system long ago, and they started teaching that we were over populated, but we are not.
And the elites are planning to kill most of the Earths population off.
Specially the Monotheists who they say aren't compatible with their global government system.
Bullshit...
The Earth is in fact overpopulated. I strongly suggest you return to Biology Class and unplug your ears. Here, I'll even help you. Get to know these terms very well...
Carrying Capacity
Population Growth to food production ratio(Hell, I'll give this one to you. Population growth doubles faster than food production. This means that if you have 1 million people one year and 2 million the next, your food stores would not have been able to keep up. This eventually leads to starvation, which can be linked with Carrying Capacity...)
Tricks @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:22 pm
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
$1:
Thats an elite lie. The Earth is not over populated. You can fit the entire population into one US state with room to spare.
The Elites got hold of the education system long ago, and they started teaching that we were over populated, but we are not.
And the elites are planning to kill most of the Earths population off.
Specially the Monotheists who they say aren't compatible with their global government system.
The Elites got hold of the education system long ago, and they started teaching that we were over populated, but we are not.
And the elites are planning to kill most of the Earths population off.
Specially the Monotheists who they say aren't compatible with their global government system.
Bullshit...
The Earth is in fact overpopulated. I strongly suggest you return to Biology Class and unplug your ears. Here, I'll even help you. Get to know these terms very well...
Carrying Capacity
Population Growth to food production ratio(Hell, I'll give this one to you. Population growth doubles faster than food production. This means that if you have 1 million people one year and 2 million the next, your food stores would not have been able to keep up. This eventually leads to starvation, which can be linked with Carrying Capacity...)
"Catton defines carrying capacity as the number of people a given environment can support indefinitely. The environment is not harmed to the extent that it can no longer support the population, and the population does not increase to the point that it places undue strain on the environment. In a sustainable economic system, the needs of the population are balanced against the health of the environment."
What you are talking about is Thomas Malthus' theory. He predicted that the population would grow geometrically (1,2,4,8) while food production would grow arithmetically (1,2,3,4). However, he failed to forsee the Industrial revolution and the extra production amount that came from it.
Tricks @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:24 pm
Oh and as an added point, the world is infact NOT overpopulated when it comes to food. There is enough food in the world to feed everyone, and we have not used all the land that is available to grow it.
Arctic_Menace @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:29 pm
$1:
What you are talking about is Thomas Malthus' theory. He predicted that the population would grow geometrically (1,2,4, while food production would grow arithmetically (1,2,3,4). However, he failed to forsee the Industrial revolution and the extra production amount that came from it.
That's the one. And while he did not count on the Industrial Revolution, it will indeed catch up with us, so don't discount it...
$1:
I assume you are talking of Catton's theory on Carrying Capacity? Sorry to correct you, but...
"Catton defines carrying capacity as the number of people a given environment can support indefinitely. The environment is not harmed to the extent that it can no longer support the population, and the population does not increase to the point that it places undue strain on the environment. In a sustainable economic system, the needs of the population are balanced against the health of the environment."
"Catton defines carrying capacity as the number of people a given environment can support indefinitely. The environment is not harmed to the extent that it can no longer support the population, and the population does not increase to the point that it places undue strain on the environment. In a sustainable economic system, the needs of the population are balanced against the health of the environment."
I think you misunderstand me. I wanted this CT to go and learn about carrying capacity AND Thomas Malthus' theory...
The carrying capacity that was taught to me is where it si the maximum number of a given species that it's environment can hold. It will rise above the limit, which leads to some sort of disease or natural disaster which brings it back into balance. Imagine it being a teetering scale that goes back and forth in roughly the same area...
Tricks @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:34 pm
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
That's the one. And while he did not count on the Industrial Revolution, it will indeed catch up with us, so don't discount it...
I never said to discount it. But it isn't going to happen for a few years.$1:
I think you misunderstand me. I wanted this CT to go and learn about carrying capacity AND Thomas Malthus' theory...
Ah I did misunderstand. I thought you were explaining what the carrying capacity was. Sorry!$1:
The carrying capacity that was taught to me is where it si the maximum number of a given species that it's environment can hold. It will rise above the limit, which leads to some sort of disease or natural disaster which brings it back into balance. Imagine it being a teetering scale that goes back and forth in roughly the same area...
Yeppers. Trust me though, that isn't going to happen for a while. Especially with how the world is teetering on war right now.
Arctic_Menace @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:35 pm
$1:
What you are talking about is Thomas Malthus' theory. He predicted that the population would grow geometrically (1,2,4, while food production would grow arithmetically (1,2,3,4). However, he failed to forsee the Industrial revolution and the extra production amount that came from it.
That's the one. And while he did not count on the Industrial Revolution, it will indeed catch up with us, so don't discount it...
$1:
I assume you are talking of Catton's theory on Carrying Capacity? Sorry to correct you, but...
"Catton defines carrying capacity as the number of people a given environment can support indefinitely. The environment is not harmed to the extent that it can no longer support the population, and the population does not increase to the point that it places undue strain on the environment. In a sustainable economic system, the needs of the population are balanced against the health of the environment."
"Catton defines carrying capacity as the number of people a given environment can support indefinitely. The environment is not harmed to the extent that it can no longer support the population, and the population does not increase to the point that it places undue strain on the environment. In a sustainable economic system, the needs of the population are balanced against the health of the environment."
I think you misunderstand me. I wanted this CT to go and learn about carrying capacity AND Thomas Malthus' theory...
The carrying capacity that was taught to me is where it si the maximum number of a given species that it's environment can hold. It will rise above the limit, which leads to some sort of disease or natural disaster which brings it back into balance. Imagine it being a teetering scale that goes back and forth in roughly the same area...
Stupid non-standardised education system...
Tricks @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:38 pm
Struggling there arky?
Tricks @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:39 pm
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
Stupid non-standardised education system...
Well mine came from a private school...
Arctic_Menace @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:40 pm
$1:
Struggling there arky?
WTF?
Tricks @ Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:44 pm
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
$1:
Struggling there arky?
WTF?
