I want $350,000
I don't know if it's true, but it's definitely worth looking into. My question is if this happened a year ago, why come out with your story now? If he had complained a year ago he could have saved a lot of people from abuse.
But is the U.S. military going to give him one cent? NO.
The US military, and the rest of the government, is going to be facing a lot of suits like this. Some will be real and some won't, but they've been detaining, torturing, and generally abusing people for quite some time, both in the US and abroad. This makes two Canadians suing them for sure...Maher Arar and Hossam Shaltout. There are going to be suits launched for all over the world (a couple of those British citizens who locked up in Guantanamo Bay are taking legal action too. You can bet the guys who had their pictures taken being tortured in Iraq are going to want some cash too. A bunch from Afghanistan as well.
The US government may refuse to join the civilised world in signing on to the ICC, but that does not make them immune to lawsuits. People have had enough of this kind of bullshit, now the US is going to have to pay the piper.
The next US President should sign on to the ICC. There is no statute of limitations on war crimes or crimes against humanity. After signing on, the US should open the books. Those involved in crimes need to be locked up. They are little better than rabid animals.
heh, he's challenging them in the american language of suing....but yeah, that does seem a bit late doesn't it....
Do you always believe everything you read?
You, as usual, seem to be in a major hurry to convict any and all Americans for any offense real or imagined. Care to enlighten us all as to where and how this hate was birthed?
Perhaps you're not cognisant of the fact(s) that in a war, bad things happen. Did you know that? People get killed, maimed, dismembered, slightly injured, beaten, abused and sometimes their cadavers are dragged through the streets to the sounds of cheering and applause.
Yup, that's the kinda stuff that occurs during a war. . . .
Hmmmm...I thought George declared the war over a year ago.
When you take someone prisoner you are taking the out of hostilities. It does not allow you to do whatever you want to them. It took years to get treaties in place that guaraneteed fair treatment of prisoners. Bush skirted this issue in Guantanamo. Is it any wonder, some of his troops feel they should be able to do whatever they want. This is nothing but a criminal act.
I would go further than that, Zen. When stress and duress techniques are used...lesser forms of torture, but still torture according to international standards...and prisoners are routinely shipped to countires known to practice torture, it sends a pretty strong message that torture is okay, even encouraged.
The intelligence people working in the jail encouraged this type of behaviour. Some of them are private contractors for the CIA...mercenaries and nothing more...but they have more power than those in the immediate military command. The military command knew about it and did little to stop it even while it was being investigated.
Look at the pictures that were released. Those aren't the faces of people afraid of getting caught.
you can see em commingout of the woodwork now....all lined up to pass go and collect....and you wonder why rummy wanted to keep a lid on it....
I don't wonder why at all, Feeko. War criminals are seldom open and honest.
You know, karra, you are absolutely correct. These things do happen in war. So do concentration camps, genocide, etc. I suppose the "I was following orders" spiel should be acceptable this time around, unlike Nuremburg. Of course, we're talking about the Americans here, not Nazi Germans. Americans can't be expected to buck orders after all, no backbone, Oh, wait a sec! They're the ones WITH the backbones; I totally forgot.
We are living in the 21st Century. We do not follow the same codes of conduct in civilian life that we did 100 or even 50 years ago; should we follow the same code of conduct in war? I think not.