Rodrigue Tremblay is professor emeritus of economics at the University of Montreal
Tragedy in the Making in Washington and on Wall Street: The Canadian Solution
Don't be silly Monty. If they restructured it as we have, not enough financial execs can cook the books well enough before it's time to ride the golden parachute.
If they print another $700 billion, then there are a couple more quarters to defer expenses and make companies look good before anyone finds out.
Your economy couldn't afford to pay their salaries, that's why they live here.
The ABCP is a poor and impractical example as applied to the real-time collapse of the financial markets. I was watching when the ABCP collapsed. I immediately liquidated all my parent's retirement money markets and stuck them in a bank account. It took months for it to get resolved. For just one structure. This solution, as nice as it is in theory, was considered impractical for the vast US mortgage market when it was first proposed.
There have been several possible solutions to the financial mess in America. Swapping the debt for the notes was one consideration. But the question was, what price do you swap the notes at? 90 cents on the dollar? 75 cents on the dollar? 50 cents on the dollar? Nobody knew because the structures were opaque. PIMCO proposed that all structures be settled at 75 cents on the dollar. However, many of those AAA structures were trading at 25 cents. In fact, the original idea of the TARP was to buy the structures and make the financial system liquid. Sitting around negotiating trillions of dollars of liabilities would take years. Between now and then, the world could collapse.
A comparable example to the ABCP is the collapse of Lehman, which arguably triggered the 40% decline in stocks over the past three months. Debtors and creditors are now locked in negotiation in bankruptcy court over the compensation of liabilities. It will take years to sort out that mess.
The economist's solution is simply not practical.