Previous  1  2  3  4  5

Hillary is still alive and well. The election of DJT tells the old farts that nothing changes.

   

I think we need something cleared up. I've seen edits when insults have been thrown towards people not on the forum, i.e. politicians. Some get edits, some don't. What's the rule on this now?

For the record I'm good with either direction, it just needs to be consistent.

   

True, I don't think that Hildacunt gets edited out, for some strange reason.

   

prime example of what I'm talking about.

   

It doesn't get posted anymore.

   

Brah won't be able to post anything, anymore.

   

Hell, half the time I either don't post something or else I struggle to write it so I'm not doing anything I'd have to go back and moderate.

   

If you see any of Brah's posts written in bold, large, red letters... don't ask questions and edit it.

   

How about you calling Ford a douchebag? Today. What Xerxes said was no worse than that. And all people have done is replace hildecunt with hildebeast.

So are we allowed to insult public figures or not?

   

And nothing of value will be lost.

   

They had to. It was obvious they were simply against females with the derogatory American usage of the word. So they elected an actual c-u-n-t in the British sense of the word.

   

Douchebag is common usage anymore and it is no longer gender specific.

   

I'm leaving in a minute so feel free to see what the rest of the moderation staff will allow.

   

I never said anything about gender. And insult is an insult. Unless that is where the bar is, I can accept that.

   

I like being indignant. It's great for clearing the sinuses.

   

Previous  1  2  3  4  5