Harper is a frigging clown.
icekarma2752 @ Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:55 pm
2nd thought maybe they knew what they were doing when they selected dion as leader since quebec always seems to dictate which govt will be formed
Streaker @ Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:03 pm
I'm away from the computer for a while and when I come back what do I see? Yup, the forum has been sanitised for our protection - once again. And an entire topic-starter has been deleted on the basis of one obnoxious line.
In the past the offending line would have been edited out and maybe a warning would take its place, leaving the post essentially intact.
What's with all this heavyhanded modding?
Tman1 @ Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:06 pm
True. However, there are only two governments in Quebec. The federalists who suck Canadian wank like Charest to get Quebec sucessions and the separatists, who are parasites who mean nothing and are brainless.
Who to vote for? I used to think Charest was a federalist but his recent pandering to Quebec's "NEEDS" and sensitivity for them is crap and shadowy. This guy is obviously not a federalist but rather a provincialist. The guy is no different than seperatists other than the fact that his needs want to go into Quebec as the special people of Canada but under a federal shadow.
Streaker @ Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:08 pm
EDIT
Patrick_Ross @ Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:11 pm
Always4Iggy Always4Iggy:
Consider this news item:
Well, as everyone knows, I am an Iggy supporter and have opposed Dion in the past. I am therefore not presenting this here to sympathise with Dion, but to point out that Poilievre and the newspaper column have thereby confirmed that the measure was aimed at people from the muslim and sikh communities!
We know that Harper is pro Jewish, that is OK, I am also pro Jewish.
But it is stupid to be anti Muslim and anti Sikh to convince Jews!
$1:
A column published this week alleged that Kennedy's delegates from the Indo-Canadian and Muslim communities had made their support contingent on the promise that he oppose the measures. The vast majority of Kennedy's delegates went on with their candidate to back Dion and help him secure the leadership.
Kennedy says the allegations made by Poilievre that were repeated in the newspaper column "are totally baseless without any factual foundation whatsoever," Kennedy said.
"This is simply a concoction that serves one interest, the decision by the prime minister to take into partisan terms what should have been in the public interest, which is the safety of Canadians."
Kennedy says the allegations made by Poilievre that were repeated in the newspaper column "are totally baseless without any factual foundation whatsoever," Kennedy said.
"This is simply a concoction that serves one interest, the decision by the prime minister to take into partisan terms what should have been in the public interest, which is the safety of Canadians."
Well, as everyone knows, I am an Iggy supporter and have opposed Dion in the past. I am therefore not presenting this here to sympathise with Dion, but to point out that Poilievre and the newspaper column have thereby confirmed that the measure was aimed at people from the muslim and sikh communities!
We know that Harper is pro Jewish, that is OK, I am also pro Jewish.
But it is stupid to be anti Muslim and anti Sikh to convince Jews!
First off, Harper doesn't have to be anti-Muslim or anti-Sikh to support anti-terrorism laws. To suggest so is so stupid as to not even qualify as sophistry.
In order to make this suggestion, you would have to advance the false premise that all Muslims and Sikhs are terrorists. We simply know this to not be the case.
On top of that, does everyone else get the humor of the site's most undisuputably demonstrated anti-semite claiming he is "pro Jewish"? Yep. I thought so.
Tman1 @ Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:14 pm
Streaker Streaker:
...disregard 
Why? I read your previous post and found it to be enlightening. You should have kept it.
USCAdad @ Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:14 pm
Patrick_Ross Patrick_Ross:
On top of that, does everyone else get the humor of the site's most undisuputably demonstrated anti-semite claiming he is "pro Jewish"? Yep. I thought so.[/color]
I'm not sure on this one. He may actually be Jewish but is just so f'ed in the head that he never knows when he's arguing against his own side. Maybe not, but it is a possibility.
Streaker @ Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:30 pm
Tman1 Tman1:
Streaker Streaker:
...disregard
Why? I read your previous post and found it to be enlightening. You should have kept it.
You mean the one where I commented on the modding? As far as I'm concerned by all means regard it!
Actually, before I edited it I had quoted your (very good) post immediately above it, thinking that it had somehow been posted in the wrong thread! Then I figured that you were replying to icekarma. Thus the "disregard".
Always4Iggy @ Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:10 pm
Streaker Streaker:
Well, whatever floats your boat, man. I do think the "fuck off and mourn in private" bit was a little much, though.
Fair enough, streaker, if you take the words in isolation as cons find it convenient. But read the whole section, and it says
$1:
Well Ms. Basnicki, let me tell you this. We all feel sorry that your husband died, but we also do not like it if you take sides in politics. You stood up there as a Harper side show, and you are an effing side show, whether you admit it or not. We mourn for everyone in the WTC and yet we are not interested in people who exploit it.
Now fuck off and mourn in private.
Now fuck off and mourn in private.
This is a different thing altogether. Let me go into the details. There were three examples of Harper's circus that I listed.
Ms Basnicki
RCMP Commissioner Zaccardeli
General Rick Hillier.
Each of them had two roles. One was their real one:
Ms Basnicki - sorrowful and understandably vengeful widow of a 9/11 deceased.
RCMP Commissioner Zaccardeli - Initiator of investigations into corruption complaints.
General Rick Hillier - Army chief.
Presumably they do a good job of it. Ms. Basnicki brings up children, Zack hands over information on suspects to Americans, Hillier fights in Afghanistan. We Liberals don't dispute that and don't criticise them for it.
But they are playing another insidiouos role by participating in Harper's Flying Circus. Zaccardeli in Harper's Lying Circus, and Basnicki and Hillier in Harper's Crying Circus. My conclusion is clear:
Always4iggy Always4iggy:
Conclusion:
Harper is getting sillier and sillier, and is reducing our police, armed forces and even victims to a f*cking conservative circus. Conservatives need to remove him urgently and bring up a better leader
Harper is getting sillier and sillier, and is reducing our police, armed forces and even victims to a f*cking conservative circus. Conservatives need to remove him urgently and bring up a better leader
In response to this, you have expressed a doubt but wisely reserved final judgement, which is more than what the cocksucker and the con prick had to say:
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
You are an ignorant piece of shit who has no respect for others who do you share your warped sense of reality. Grow the fuck up. 
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Your job is to be an idiot on an Internet Chat Forum and give Liberals a bad name?
Well, I am definitely not giving Liberals a bad name, because two prominent Liberals have said exactly what I said. Ignatieff, of course, said it in the extract itself
Ignatieff Ignatieff:
Deputy Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff said he sympathized with terror victims but labelled their appearance during the debate as "just a sideshow,"
And just in case anyone thinks that I am merely echoing what was EARLIER said, here is what Dennis Coderre said TODAY as reported in the National Post itself:
What A4I says today, Canada sez tomorrow.
$1:
Gen. Hillier drew Mr. Coderre's ire after he referred to Liberal cuts to defence spending in the 1990s as a "decade of darkness" during a speech to hundreds at a major military symposium in Ottawa.
"I never thought he would become a prop for the Conservative party," an angry Mr. Coderre fumed afterwards.
"I felt it was part of a communications plan ... To get involved in politics, there is one way: You should run."
"I never thought he would become a prop for the Conservative party," an angry Mr. Coderre fumed afterwards.
"I felt it was part of a communications plan ... To get involved in politics, there is one way: You should run."
Which is exactly my point, Streaker. To get involved in politics, there is one way: You should run.
Here is what Harper's sideshow should have done:
Ms Basnicki - run on a conservative ticket with a platform of Anti Terrorism legislation aimed at Muslims and Sikhs.
RCMP Commissioner Zaccardeli - run on a conservative ticket with a platform of the need for RCMP to unearth corruption cases against Liberals.
General Rick Hillier - Resign from the army and run on a conservative ticket with a platform of exactly how much we should spend on the army.
Otherwise, they need to 'eff' off and cry in private.
Wally_Sconce @ Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:28 pm
So widows are not allowed to get involved in politics, and certainly not allowed to voice their opinion related to issues concern the death of their husbands?
AlwaysAnIdiot, fuck off!!!
Always4Iggy @ Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:50 pm
USCAdad USCAdad:
He may actually be Jewish but is just so f'ed in the head that he never knows when he's arguing against his own side. Maybe not, but it is a possibility.
So let me see, USCAdad, you deny that you are jewish, you claim to be a circumcised child of Zionist christian parents, but you know exactly WHAT 'the jewish side' is.
Does that sound plausible to you? Not to me, my friend!
Scrappy @ Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:04 pm
Iggy you are Raptus regalitey in this debate.
Always4Iggy @ Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:07 pm
Scrappy Scrappy:
Iggy you are Raptus regalitey in this debate.
And you, Scrappy, are a coitus interruptus.
hwacker @ Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:11 pm
and speaking of clowns, Always4Iggy
Always4Iggy @ Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:11 pm
Scrappy Scrappy:
Iggy you are Raptus regalitey in this debate.
Always4Iggy Always4Iggy:
And you, Scrappy, are a coitus interruptus.
Besides, if you were educated, you would have realised that the term is 'Raptus Regaliter' and not 'Raptus Regalitey'.
So, my friend, that makes you Raptus by your own Regaliter!