England ranked number 1 in Europe.
GreatBriton @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:11 am
OPP OPP:
IcedCap IcedCap:
if they win next year it'll be inspite of Eriksson not because of him, I wish we could bring Bobby Robson circa 1986 or 1990 or Ron Greenwood circa 1982 forward through time to manage this squad its the best since 1970 imho
I'm so sick of you pricks blaming every loss on Eriksson becaus he's a foreigner and then stating that every win is despite his effords..
Englands onley won once back in '66 or something and still you expect to win every year... face it.. you suck!
How many times have Sweden won the World Cup?
And I wouldn't say Trinidad and Tobago 0-0 Sweden will be a score that makes the world quake in fear over the prospect of having to play Sweden.
EyeBrock @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:14 am
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
People dont always agree, but I am entitled to my opinion.
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Who is 'you guys'?
My mistake, I think?
I was under the impression that you were English.
But I guess you just act like one..
I am both English and a Canadian citizen.
Before your compound your ignorant statements about the English you should remember that Canada has deep roots extending back to the UK and your insults will resonate against many in this forum.
Personally I see no point in your racist behaviour.
For somebody so new to CKA I would have thought a more constructive attitude would be somewhat more productive.
Don't expect to get away with conduct this unbecoming.
OPP @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:01 am
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
People dont always agree, but I am entitled to my opinion.
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Who is 'you guys'?
My mistake, I think?
I was under the impression that you were English.
But I guess you just act like one..
I am both English and a Canadian citizen.
Before your compound your ignorant statements about the English you should remember that Canada has deep roots extending back to the UK and your insults will resonate against many in this forum.
Personally I see no point in your racist behaviour.
For somebody so new to CKA I would have thought a more constructive attitude would be somewhat more productive.
Don't expect to get away with conduct this unbecoming.
There you go again! Could you please point out where exactly you find a racist remark, from my part, in this conversation!
Canada do has "deep roots extending back to the UK", that much is true.
The so called "bible belt" in the U.S has deep roots extending back in Sweden. That does not make them, the people reciding in this s.c bible belt, swedes or even remotly swedish.
I don't see why Canadiens would feel upset with me criticising England.
... and one more thing, criticisme is constructive.
OPP @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:12 am
GreatBriton GreatBriton:
OPP OPP:
IcedCap IcedCap:
if they win next year it'll be inspite of Eriksson not because of him, I wish we could bring Bobby Robson circa 1986 or 1990 or Ron Greenwood circa 1982 forward through time to manage this squad its the best since 1970 imho
I'm so sick of you pricks blaming every loss on Eriksson becaus he's a foreigner and then stating that every win is despite his effords..
Englands onley won once back in '66 or something and still you expect to win every year... face it.. you suck!
How many times have Sweden won the World Cup?
And I wouldn't say Trinidad and Tobago 0-0 Sweden will be a score that makes the world quake in fear over the prospect of having to play Sweden.
We, on the other hand, don't demand that the Swedish team should win every WC.
Mentioning that sweden has a population of 9 million people, puts the swedish results in another perspective.
EyeBrock @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:27 am
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
People dont always agree, but I am entitled to my opinion.
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Who is 'you guys'?
My mistake, I think?
I was under the impression that you were English.
But I guess you just act like one..
I am both English and a Canadian citizen.
Before your compound your ignorant statements about the English you should remember that Canada has deep roots extending back to the UK and your insults will resonate against many in this forum.
Personally I see no point in your racist behaviour.
For somebody so new to CKA I would have thought a more constructive attitude would be somewhat more productive.
Don't expect to get away with conduct this unbecoming.
There you go again! Could you please point out where exactly you find a racist remark, from my part, in this conversation!
Canada do has "deep roots extending back to the UK", that much is true.
The so called "bible belt" in the U.S has deep roots extending back in Sweden. That does not make them, the people reciding in this s.c bible belt, swedes or even remotly swedish.
I don't see why Canadiens would feel upset with me criticising England.
... and one more thing, criticisme is constructive.
I would say that this is a tad racist:
"The point being that the english simply are to stupid to understand football..."
As for Swedes in the US, hardly the same old chap.
And your so called 'criticism' is in no way constructive.
OPP @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:54 am
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
People dont always agree, but I am entitled to my opinion.
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Who is 'you guys'?
My mistake, I think?
I was under the impression that you were English.
But I guess you just act like one..
I am both English and a Canadian citizen.
Before your compound your ignorant statements about the English you should remember that Canada has deep roots extending back to the UK and your insults will resonate against many in this forum.
Personally I see no point in your racist behaviour.
For somebody so new to CKA I would have thought a more constructive attitude would be somewhat more productive.
Don't expect to get away with conduct this unbecoming.
There you go again! Could you please point out where exactly you find a racist remark, from my part, in this conversation!
Canada do has "deep roots extending back to the UK", that much is true.
The so called "bible belt" in the U.S has deep roots extending back in Sweden. That does not make them, the people reciding in this s.c bible belt, swedes or even remotly swedish.
I don't see why Canadiens would feel upset with me criticising England.
... and one more thing, criticisme is constructive.
I would say that this is a tad racist:
"The point being that the english simply are to stupid to understand football..."
As for Swedes in the US, hardly the same old chap.
And your so called 'criticism' is in no way constructive.
What does race have to do with me calling englishmen stupid?
Does this ring a bell:
“Do we really think jihadis want a tolerant, multicultural world? Tolerance is a Western ideal, and the Islamists hate Western ideals.
I'd say that this is a bit more racist than my outspoken beliefe that englishmen are to stupid to understand football.
EyeBrock @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:59 am
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
People dont always agree, but I am entitled to my opinion.
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Who is 'you guys'?
My mistake, I think?
I was under the impression that you were English.
But I guess you just act like one..
I am both English and a Canadian citizen.
Before your compound your ignorant statements about the English you should remember that Canada has deep roots extending back to the UK and your insults will resonate against many in this forum.
Personally I see no point in your racist behaviour.
For somebody so new to CKA I would have thought a more constructive attitude would be somewhat more productive.
Don't expect to get away with conduct this unbecoming.
There you go again! Could you please point out where exactly you find a racist remark, from my part, in this conversation!
Canada do has "deep roots extending back to the UK", that much is true.
The so called "bible belt" in the U.S has deep roots extending back in Sweden. That does not make them, the people reciding in this s.c bible belt, swedes or even remotly swedish.
I don't see why Canadiens would feel upset with me criticising England.
... and one more thing, criticisme is constructive.
I would say that this is a tad racist:
"The point being that the english simply are to stupid to understand football..."
As for Swedes in the US, hardly the same old chap.
And your so called 'criticism' is in no way constructive.
What does race have to do with me calling englishmen stupid?
Does this ring a bell:
“Do we really think jihadis want a tolerant, multicultural world? Tolerance is a Western ideal, and the Islamists hate Western ideals.
I'd say that this is a bit more racist than my outspoken beliefe that englishmen are to stupid to understand football.
Firstly that is a quote from a national news paper which is in no way racist. I can't see how you can get 'racist' from the tolerance comment.
You on the other hand said that all English were stupid. That is racist.
I still haven't heard you back up your version of why the Battle of Britain was won and when.
Are you going to be wrong about everything?
We shall see.
OPP @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:10 am
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
OPP OPP:
People dont always agree, but I am entitled to my opinion.
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Call it democracys back side but that's just the way the wind blows on our end. You guys on the other hand seem to be well on your way developing a police state! Good for YOU!
Who is 'you guys'?
My mistake, I think?
I was under the impression that you were English.
But I guess you just act like one..
I am both English and a Canadian citizen.
Before your compound your ignorant statements about the English you should remember that Canada has deep roots extending back to the UK and your insults will resonate against many in this forum.
Personally I see no point in your racist behaviour.
For somebody so new to CKA I would have thought a more constructive attitude would be somewhat more productive.
Don't expect to get away with conduct this unbecoming.
There you go again! Could you please point out where exactly you find a racist remark, from my part, in this conversation!
Canada do has "deep roots extending back to the UK", that much is true.
The so called "bible belt" in the U.S has deep roots extending back in Sweden. That does not make them, the people reciding in this s.c bible belt, swedes or even remotly swedish.
I don't see why Canadiens would feel upset with me criticising England.
... and one more thing, criticisme is constructive.
I would say that this is a tad racist:
"The point being that the english simply are to stupid to understand football..."
As for Swedes in the US, hardly the same old chap.
And your so called 'criticism' is in no way constructive.
What does race have to do with me calling englishmen stupid?
Does this ring a bell:
“Do we really think jihadis want a tolerant, multicultural world? Tolerance is a Western ideal, and the Islamists hate Western ideals.
I'd say that this is a bit more racist than my outspoken beliefe that englishmen are to stupid to understand football.
Firstly that is a quote from a national news paper which is in no way racist. I can't see how you can get 'racist' from the tolerance comment.
You on the other hand said that all English were stupid. That is racist.
I still haven't heard you back up your version of why the Battle of Britain was won and when.
Are you going to be wrong about everything?
We shall see.
I did not say that your quote was racist. What i did say was as following: "that this is a bit more racist than my outspoken beliefe that englishmen are to stupid to understand football".
... and I still don't see how I am a racist. You are probably enterpeting my coment, that englishmen are to stupid to understand football, as my outspoken beliefe that anglosaxons are inferior in intelligence when compared to what?
EyeBrock @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:20 am
opee pee said:
$1:
I did not say that your quote was racist. What i did say was as following: "that this is a bit more racist than my outspoken beliefe that englishmen are to stupid to understand football".
... and I still don't see how I am a racist. You are probably enterpeting my coment, that englishmen are to stupid to understand football, as my outspoken beliefe that anglosaxons are inferior in intelligence when compared to what?
... and I still don't see how I am a racist. You are probably enterpeting my coment, that englishmen are to stupid to understand football, as my outspoken beliefe that anglosaxons are inferior in intelligence when compared to what?
labelling any one race or nation 'stupid' is racist. Now you are hinting we are inferior?
Maybe you should just think before you write.
You still haven't explained your version of the Battle of Britain.
OPP @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:38 am
Don't do that EyeBrock. Don't act like a child! You know damn well what I mean!
Such nonsense just makes me feel that I'm wasting my time on you and want to end this conversation.
... and mabye if you update the page you would see my answer.. try doing that from now on...
EyeBrock @ Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:49 am
OPP OPP:
Don't do that EyeBrock. Don't act like a child! You know damn well what I mean!
Such nonsense just makes me feel that I'm wasting my time on you and want to end this conversation.
... and mabye if you update the page you would see my answer.. try doing that from now on...
Such nonsense just makes me feel that I'm wasting my time on you and want to end this conversation.
... and mabye if you update the page you would see my answer.. try doing that from now on...
Well, watch what you say and learn a few things about subjects before you comment on them.
Then we will all get on fine.