Previous  1  2  3  Next

Or execution.



I've long warned that if pedophilia is determined to be an incurable orientation in line with the premise that homosexuality is an incurable orientation then the ramifications towards pedophiles might not be so accepting even as they have been towards homosexuals.

If the people pushing this narrative are looking to get people to accept and tolerate pedo as an orientation I'm afraid they don't understand parents and our society in general.

Because once they make the case that pedos can't be cured then the reaction of society will be to sentence them to lifetime incarceration and individual parents may be spurred to dispensing frontier justice to these people with the argument that since they can't be cured then killing them is the only way to make sure they're no longer a danger to children.

It may sound weird coming from me but I'm concerned for those pedos who may wish to control their urges or who sincerely wish to change. I would not want to see them get killed or locked up forever simply for seeking help.

   

Unfortunately your definition of "treatment" and the ones being pushed by the left differ drastically.

But, TBH I prefer yours.

   

People can accept what two well dressed affluent people do in private. People will never accept harm done to children.

Nor should they ever.



I was being kind.

What I was thinking was actually 'Medieval'.

   

Well if you don't know then why jump in to support the statement that they are?
And then you say your claiming that 'this media is liberal Democrat' that it shows your bipartisanship.
Jeez no wonder you support Trump, it's the same shit he does.

   

I don't see that at all. Quite the opposite--in the 50s, sex with children was widely accepted. Marrying off 13 year olds was quite common and sexual abuse of children was much more widespread than it is now. Homosexuality was generally reviled the way pedophilia is now. They've kind of swapped places. Over time pedophilia has become less accepted by western civilization, not more.

   

Not true at all. Early civilizations regularly sacrificed children for example. Morals circa 2017 in Canada are not the morals of all people for all time.

   

Really? You're going with that - parsing 'normalize'? Who said anything about 'normalize', other than you - does that mean you're going to use 'ab' and 'sub' 'normalize' next? That, should be fun.

But, bottom line is, as you state - not a lie but a right-wing interpretation, so you say, which has nothing to do with what I stated.

Do you ever listen to yourself ? No '/s' here at all - even at the bottom of the page...

   

So, you're the new 'trauma-boi' are you - pointing out imaginary lies as only you, wearing blinders can do and simultaneously engaging in conniptions, profanities, weeping and wailing, perhaps a dollop of gnashing? - guess you're to be congratulated in spite of the fact you typically come up short when taken to task - empty, nothing, nada, pustoy, vide, vuoto, tomma - I could go on but I think and hope you get the point - if not, let me know.

My suggestion to you is that you stop avoiding what you say; that nasty karra told a lie and you caught her and told her off using bad language all the while wearing your Trauma-boi guise - and tell us all about the 'lie' - after all, there must be one, 'cause you say so.

And then you're going to race to be first to call someone out - guess you're to be congratulated, encore. I'm searching Amazon as I type looking for a mask and cape - just pour toi.

And then you, disguised or not as a 'Trauma-boi' are going to police anything I say that you figure with all your might is contrary to what you think you know - damn!! You're a tough act, Trauma-boi - don't know what I can do to help you wit dat - any suggestions?

Still haven't seen a word from you as to what the lie is - waiting, waiting. . . .

I see Bart provided a list - I believe he stated it was not all-encompassing - here's a few of your idol...

   

You're kidding, right - because you say 'in the '50s' pedophilia was widely accepted - perhaps in the corner of whatever world you inhabit(ed).

Proof - or you're full of crap.

   

Nothing I said is at odds with what Karra said.

   

To be exact, pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children as is underlined by the NAMBLA mantra of "sex before eight or else it's too late".

An attraction to pubescent but sexually immature children/adolescents is called pederasty.

Pedophiles can be attracted to INFANTS and TODDLERS and that's what we're really getting at when we talk about 'normalizing' this kind of thing.

   

Sex with children was widely accepted--not pedophilia. Pedophilia has a specific definition, which is a sexual attraction to children who haven't yet developed their secondary sexual characteristics. Sex with children who have reached puberty wouldn't be considered pedophilia. It was very common to marry children (under 18)--Loretta Lynn, Jerry Lee Lewis, Elvis Presley.

Institutional sexual abuse was more common as well, in the public schools of England, residential schools of Canada and the Catholic Church among others. Children are better protected now, in my opinion.

   

What evidence do you have that this is being normalized? I don't see it. Consent is a way bigger issue now than it has been in the past, primarily due to the work of feminists in my opinion. Milo Yiannopolis casually mentioned that sex between 13 year old boys and adults could be consensual and it destroyed him. I'm not seeing any normalization.

I'm seeing normalization of gender fluidity and polyamourous relationships, but I think, as a society, we've become less tolerant of child sexual abuse over time.

   

And yet, there's an entire generation that's dedicated themselves to proving the opposite.

   

Who's that? The boomers? They're the ones in charge of all the decisions

   

Previous  1  2  3  Next