600 who handle EI claims to lose own jobs
Newsbot @ Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:14 am
Title: 600 who handle EI claims to lose own jobs
Category: Misc CDN
Posted By: RoyalHighlander
Date: 2010-08-28 07:29:48
Canadian
bootlegga @ Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:14 am
Talk about irony.
kenmore @ Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:20 am
Well like the recession/depression harper says we didn't have, I suppose mr " I make the rules" says there is no unemployment.. like there is no more need for veterans affairs because the men and women fighting now won't be veterans....
Apollo @ Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:24 am
kenmore kenmore:
Well like the recession/depression harper says we didn't have, I suppose mr " I make the rules" says there is no unemployment.. like there is no more need for veterans affairs because the men and women fighting now won't be veterans....
Harper never said we didnt have a recession. Plus we came nowhere close to a depression. Whatever helps you spew your hatred for the man.
raydan @ Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:48 am
kenmore kenmore:
Well like the recession/depression harper says we didn't have, I suppose mr " I make the rules" says there is no unemployment.. like there is no more need for veterans affairs because the men and women fighting now won't be veterans....
I don't know how you can read,
$1:
"...said the jobs were just temporary to begin with."
say that this is because of a recession/depression and then blame it on Harper.Besides, wouldn't less people working at EI be a good thing?
You don't hate Harper, Ken, you hate the party he "works" for.
I'm sure that if he ever switched sides, you'd love him.
Just like a hockey player that's hated... as soon as he's traded to your team, the hate is forgotten.
QBC @ Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:28 am
Sure a lot being read into some temp jobs being cut. The story is about EI temporary positions no longer being necessary and it somehow gets to veteran affairs? Some just can't seem to stay on topic I guess.
andyt @ Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:36 am
All indications are that they'll have to hire those folks back soon enough. Unless Harper does his "If we were going to have a (double dip) recession we would have had it by now" schtick again.
Apollo @ Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:22 am
andyt andyt:
All indications are that they'll have to hire those folks back soon enough. Unless Harper does his "If we were going to have a (double dip) recession we would have had it by now" schtick again.
"all indications"? Really? Care to elaborate?
Wada @ Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:30 am
Standard fare. No foul. No story.
andyt @ Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:27 pm
Apollo Apollo:
andyt andyt:
All indications are that they'll have to hire those folks back soon enough. Unless Harper does his "If we were going to have a (double dip) recession we would have had it by now" schtick again.
"all indications"? Really? Care to elaborate?
Feel free to read the business section of any newspaper. I prefer the Globe and Mail.