Battlefield North?
Heavy_Metal @ Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:10 pm
RUEZ RUEZ:
There's no denying it now, everyone is interested in the Arctic. It's time we got off our asses.
yup.....we need more than inuits on sleds doing the 'ol soverigenty patrol
ziggy @ Sat Jul 14, 2007 12:30 am
Heavy_Metal Heavy_Metal:
RUEZ RUEZ:
There's no denying it now, everyone is interested in the Arctic. It's time we got off our asses.
yup.....we need more than inuits on sleds doing the 'ol soverigenty patrol
No matter who or how many people you put up there it will still come down to Innuit's on sleds doin the old patrols.There's not exactly very many roads there,air travel is dependant on weather and not sure about the high Arctic but the lower arctic has allmost 10 feet of ice on most waterbodies come winter.
So when all the modern modes of transportation are grounded for cold or blizzard and the polaris wont start there's still the trusty dog team.
ShepherdsDog @ Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:02 am
The Rangers will keep the baddies away.
ziggy @ Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:04 am
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
The Rangers will keep the baddies away.
The weather will keep the baddies away.
sasquatch2 @ Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:04 am
Bootlegga
$1:
the National Post
$1:
Aurora fighter planes "???? Is this the Post or the Star?
Yeah! I read that too. Who wrote this crap Al Gore or David Suzuki?
Actually the Rangers are not so much of a joke as it would appear.
These guys are natural marksmen, thoroughly aclimatized, and thoroughly familiar with their surroundings.
Despite the age of the Lee-Enfields, they are more reliable and effective, in the frigid enviroment and massive engagement ranges a hypothetical scrap, in that area, would involve. I would not trust a C1 (FAL) or C7 (M16A2) in sub-zero conditions whereas the old smellie is as reliable as a stone-hammer.
ziggy @ Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:10 am
sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
Bootlegga
Yeah! I read that too. Who wrote this crap Al Gore or David Suzuki?
Actually the Rangers are not so much of a joke as it would appear.
These guys are natural marksmen, thoroughly aclimatized, and thoroughly familiar with their surroundings.
Despite the age of the Lee-Enfields, they are more reliable and effective, in the frigid enviroment and massive engagement ranges a hypothetical scrap, in that area, would involve. I would not trust a C1 (FAL) or C7 (M16A2) in sub-zero conditions whereas the old smellie is as reliable as a stone-hammer.
$1:
the National Post
$1:
Aurora fighter planes "???? Is this the Post or the Star?
Yeah! I read that too. Who wrote this crap Al Gore or David Suzuki?
Actually the Rangers are not so much of a joke as it would appear.
These guys are natural marksmen, thoroughly aclimatized, and thoroughly familiar with their surroundings.
Despite the age of the Lee-Enfields, they are more reliable and effective, in the frigid enviroment and massive engagement ranges a hypothetical scrap, in that area, would involve. I would not trust a C1 (FAL) or C7 (M16A2) in sub-zero conditions whereas the old smellie is as reliable as a stone-hammer.
You got that right,no joke there.