Canadians find risk too great, abandon planned attack
andyt @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:48 am
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
Troll on.
All you've got, huh?
djakeydd @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:59 am
Newsbot Newsbot:
Title: Canadians find risk too great, abandon planned attack
Category: Military
Posted By: Curtman
Date: 2011-03-22 13:46:37
Canadian
Category: Military
Posted By: Curtman
Date: 2011-03-22 13:46:37
Canadian
Bout time someone showed some restraint and demonstrated they have a brain - as opposed to the individual fully responsible for launching this mission.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... apart.html
EyeBrock @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:02 am
andyt andyt:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
Troll on.
All you've got, huh?
All you have is looking to pick a fight. Trolling along as usual andy. Tell us all what you do for a living that makes your viewpoints so un-black and white.
andyt @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:06 am
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
andyt andyt:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
Troll on.
All you've got, huh?
All you have is looking to pick a fight. Trolling along as usual andy. Tell us all what you do for a living that makes your viewpoints so un-black and white.
You're really losing it here, Brock. What does what I do for a living have to do with this? And you mentioned me directly in your post, to which I responded. How is that looking for a fight? You call me Mr anti-establishment, but my calling you Mr Black and White are fighting words?
EyeBrock @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:12 am
No, I'd like to find where you have applied discretion to situations in the past which would justify your stance that I'm black and white.
Your anti-establishment credentials are well known as is your lack of knowledge on this subject.
We can continue this in PM as I'm sure everybody is quite bored of your little bouts of trolling with most of us.
andyt @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:19 am
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
No, I'd like to find where you have applied discretion to situations in the past which would justify your stance that I'm black and white.
Your anti-establishment credentials are well known as is your lack of knowledge on this subject.
We can continue this in PM as I'm sure everybody is quite bored of your little bouts of trolling with most of us.
Your anti-establishment credentials are well known as is your lack of knowledge on this subject.
We can continue this in PM as I'm sure everybody is quite bored of your little bouts of trolling with most of us.
I'm not into pms - you don't want to discuss it here, we can just drop it.
Lemmy @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:21 am
PMs aren't on a troll's diet. It has to be a public display to satisfy.
GreenTiger @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:25 am
Chicken Shit leaders in the ME always put their military assets near civilian areas such as schools, hospitals, residential areas in the hopes that civilized forces will be inhibited from attacking them.
One may well applaude the RCAF for not attacking, they may have been entirely correct, but at the same time you would have to credit the Colonel for successfully defending the targets without firing a shot.
EyeBrock @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:29 am
The RCAF was disbanded in 1969 GT, but I get your point!
GreenTiger @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:36 am
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
The RCAF was disbanded in 1969 GT, but I get your point!
What do you call The Canadian Air Force these days?
bootlegga @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:44 am
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
The RCAF was disbanded in 1969 GT, but I get your point!
What do you call The Canadian Air Force these days?
Air Command
Smacle @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:40 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Better yet, let's just hope the job gets done with a minimum of bloodshed.
Hahahahaha.
That's not up to us, is it?
Fuck 'em. They're shooting civilians. Slaughter them all.
EyeBrok EyeBrok:
Enemy? Let's get us some?
Really CP, you should refrain from such uneducated and bellicose comments.
Really CP, you should refrain from such uneducated and bellicose comments.
If you're gonna get involved, you better unleash hell.
Guy_Fawkes @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:15 pm
Smacle Smacle:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Better yet, let's just hope the job gets done with a minimum of bloodshed.
Hahahahaha.
That's not up to us, is it?
Fuck 'em. They're shooting civilians. Slaughter them all.
EyeBrok EyeBrok:
Enemy? Let's get us some?
Really CP, you should refrain from such uneducated and bellicose comments.
Really CP, you should refrain from such uneducated and bellicose comments.
If you're gonna get involved, you better unleash hell.
Your a mature one arent you, people with your attitude dont last long in the CF. I know of a few who either changed their outlook or ended up leaving when their contract was up.
CDN_PATRIOT @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:09 pm
Smacle Smacle:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Better yet, let's just hope the job gets done with a minimum of bloodshed.
Hahahahaha.
That's not up to us, is it?
Fuck 'em. They're shooting civilians. Slaughter them all.
EyeBrok EyeBrok:
Enemy? Let's get us some?
Really CP, you should refrain from such uneducated and bellicose comments.
Really CP, you should refrain from such uneducated and bellicose comments.
If you're gonna get involved, you better unleash hell.
Concur. Gaddafi has been wasting his own people, the latest being the people his snipers are smoking in HOSPITALS. It's about time we sent some missiles into his compound and took him out. If the Coalition is going to keep going at this, HIT THEM FAST, HIT THEM HARD. There is no other way.
-J.
Guy_Fawkes @ Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:15 pm
Yes lets assassinate the leader of a foreign nation, that will fix everything! 
When you two clowns are the ones who will have to go in to this nation and fight its soldiers you can beat the drums and rattle the sabers. Of course if you still want to sound like a couple of teenage yahoos drunk on 18 straight hrs of FPS, keep making your 'git er dun!' comments.