1  2  Next

<strong>Title: </strong> <a href="/link.php?id=32007" target="_blank">French Muslim war graves defaced</a> (click to view)

<strong>Category:</strong> <a href="/news/topic/16-world" target="_blank">World</a>
<strong>Posted By: </strong> <a href="/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=userinfo&username=romanP" target="_blank">romanP</a>
<strong>Date: </strong> 2008-04-06 16:10:04
<strong>Canadian</strong>

   

Apparently your concern does not run to defacing Canadian memorials romanP.

Good to know!

   

That's a little unfair, isn't it? As far as I see roman hasn't posted anything celebrating or justifying the defacement of Canadian memorials....

Maybe it's about time that you removed the cigar tube from your ass, Wullu.

   

Give him time.



Why? Cause you called 'dibs' on it first?

   

No, Shep did.

   

Time for what? Time to make you and Wullu look like the idiots you so often are?

If you want my opinion, you can ask for it, but I don't take kindly to people accusing me of saying things I haven't said.

Here's a funny joke:

What do racist cartoons of Mohammed and defacing the graves of Muslims have in common?

   

Given time, I have no doubts that you'll celebrate or defend vandalism against Canadian War Memorials. That's just the impression you've made.



That you're more upset about them than most muslims are?

   

I cannot and will not condone this vandalism although I can understand it.
These poor excuses for people have crossed a line that cannot be crossed.

What this is is a very badly expressed protest against the flood of muslim imigration and it's consequences. There are certainly more acceptable ways to express their discontent.

Graveyards and graves---military or civilian are inviolete----not to be F****ed with.

   

In 50 years France's Muslim majority will be tearing down Notre Dame but it sure doesn't excuse the despicable behaviour of those who would commit such a horrendous act right now.

   

romanp, this article is quite obviously posted as a reaction of the to the Monument story that was posted earlier...as a "counter balance" If this was purely coincidental...then you post at an interesting time

   

Yes, that an article dated April 6th, 2008 was posted here on April 6th, 2008 is just too coincidental - maybe if he'd brought this up before it was reported it'd satisfy you?

   

Not what I meant, coincidental in the relation that there was a topic about Canadian Peacekeeper monument already being discussed and then this is brought up, in a topic completely unrelated to Canada, or even any wave/rise of anti-Muslim violence or anything.

Of course you're completely missing the point. I'm saying that if he did not see the other article, which would be surprising, but if this was posted JUST to be a counterbalance, or to try to provoke a response, then there's no point

To add, its a disgusting act and such, I'm just questioning the...motives of the posting

   

What?? Streaker wants to introduce a foreign object to his colon?? That's his life partner's responsibility.

Back to the defacing of the veteran's graves....despicable. These men fought and died for other people's freedom.

   

You're imagining things, as usual. Keep waiting.



How do you know how upset Muslims are about it? I doubt anyone likes having their family's grave vandalised, nevermind which religion they subscribe to.

Oooh, wait, I forgot, you live in Stereotypeland, so the only way for you to guage if Muslims are upset about this is whether or not they're rioting, as if that's the only way Muslims know how to show their anger.

If these had been American Christian graves, you would have been pissing your pants over it.

No, the similarities are that the same kinds of people are prone doing both.

   

It is pure coincidence. I haven't even seen that thread.

   

1  2  Next