Fugitive Paris attack jihadi went to gay bars, took drugs an
martin14 @ Tue Nov 24, 2015 11:23 am
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
It's ok to insult while you're also making an argument at the same time but when your only rebuttal is an insult you lose
Oh, is it ? I don't remember reading that in the forum rules.
You weren't making an argument, you were whining about making things better.
That is no argument, just complaining.
But it is an argument to call you wrong.
It is an argument to correct your error.
You are still an ignorant piece of shit that knows nothing about history.
2Cdo @ Tue Nov 24, 2015 11:25 am
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
It's ok to insult while you're also making an argument at the same time but when your only rebuttal is an insult you lose
There's that movement of goal-lines when exposed as the one who initiated the insults. HaHaHaHaHaHaha
Tyler_1 @ Tue Nov 24, 2015 11:25 am
If you Peeps don't quit acting like butthurt pussies, I'm tossing you out in the snow! 
Tyler_1 @ Tue Nov 24, 2015 11:26 am
Just kidding!
![[door]](./images/smilies/aaa.gif "Scared Door")
xerxes @ Tue Nov 24, 2015 12:28 pm
From an UK intel report:
$1:
Far from being religious zealots, a large number of those involved in terrorism do not practise their faith regularly. Many lack religious literacy and could actually be regarded as religious novices. Very few have been brought up in strongly religious households, and there is a higher than average proportion of converts. Some are involved in drug-taking, drinking alcohol and visiting prostitutes. MI5 says there is evidence that a well-established religious identity actually protects against violent radicalisation.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/aug/20/uksecurity.terrorism1?CMP=share_btn_tw
BartSimpson @ Tue Nov 24, 2015 12:33 pm
xerxes xerxes:
From an UK intel report:
Saying anything accurate in a less-than-highly-classified UK intel report would be hazardous to one's career.
Meaning you should appreciate that it's predictably coloured by politics.
I'd be much more interested in finding out what the PM's daily security briefing has to say.
xerxes @ Tue Nov 24, 2015 12:34 pm
Fair enough. Though in this instance, it does corroborate with the op in this thread.
martin14 @ Tue Nov 24, 2015 1:14 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Meaning you should appreciate that it's predictably coloured by politics.
And then coloured a deep apologist red by the Guardian staff.
BeaverFever @ Wed Nov 25, 2015 8:46 pm
ccga3359 @ Wed Nov 25, 2015 9:19 pm
For some reason BeaverFever post was not showing up on my feed. If this is the case here is his link;
"How ISIS shook up the world 2015-HQ-Blindsided"
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x30rk9a
BeaverFever @ Wed Nov 25, 2015 9:25 pm
Thanks - I'm on my phone and sometimes can't see media on this site. My post looks blank to me.
ccga3359 @ Wed Nov 25, 2015 9:32 pm
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
Thanks - I'm on my phone and sometimes can't see media on this site. My post looks blank to me.
No problem. I originally posted it with the obligatory [video] tags but it didn't post. Maybe it's an issue with Dailymotion vids. Your post is blank so I was going to compliment you on your argument being so brilliant that I couldn't possibly respond to it.
Thanos @ Wed Nov 25, 2015 10:03 pm
The [video] tags only work with YouTube clips here unfortunately. I've seen someone post a Vimeo or Dailymotion here at least once but only Azazel knows how they did it.
Benn @ Fri Nov 27, 2015 12:10 am
Not ISIS but when we did the Embassy thing we had friends who lived in those countries with morality police and such due to their strict moral religious laws. At any rate many government officials would come by the Canadian Embassy club and drink like fish and gamble like bandits with foul mouths to boot. So I'd hardly be shocked if the mental midgets of ISIS leadership were doing the same.
BeaverFever @ Fri Nov 27, 2015 2:28 pm
2Cdo 2Cdo:
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
It's ok to insult while you're also making an argument at the same time but when your only rebuttal is an insult you lose
There's that movement of goal-lines when exposed as the one who initiated the insults. HaHaHaHaHaHaha
Oh I'm not sure I initiated it. Like the dos equis guy: I don't always make insult, but when I do, it's followed up with a continuation of the argument and a rebuttal to your argument. I don't ever just call someone a name as my only rebuttal. Unfortunately that's something Martin has to resort often.