Louisiana cemetery 'sorry' after denying officer burial 'bec
PublicAnimalNo9 @ Thu Feb 11, 2021 12:00 am
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
No, like Boise, Idaho; Gardnerville, Nevada; Darien, Connecticut; Lake Forest, Illinois - where Anti-Jewish and Anti-Black laws on housing remained until 1990.
DrCaleb @ Thu Feb 11, 2021 8:16 am
Whataboutery.
Tricks @ Thu Feb 11, 2021 8:47 am
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund wrote an 8-page letter detailing the events that occurred at the Capitol on January 6. In the letter addressed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Sund’s timeline of events seems to directly refute the Democrats’ claim that the insurrection on Capitol Hill was incited by a speech given by President Donald Trump on the same day. The Democrats’ entire impeachment case against Trump rests solely on the assumption that his speech caused the disturbing events that unfolded inside the Capitol as a joint session of Congress met to certify the electoral votes of the 2020 Presidential Election.
Actually, a lot of their evidence is about the lead up to the election as well. They're saying he stoked the flames for months and that the 6th was just pouring gasoline on it.$1:
In the letter, Sund, who stepped down as Chief shortly after the insurrection occurred, states that his department “did not fail,” adding that the Capitol Police acted according to the intelligence available prior to the events. There was never any information showing they would be facing a group of “thousands of well-coordinated, well-equipped violent criminals,” intent upon attacking law enforcement officers as they sought to gain access to the Capitol itself.
Yes, they all missed the constant twitter posts that shit was going to go down on the 6th. Guy is covering his own ass after members of his police force LET the protestors in. $1:
Sund asserts that he would like to “set the record straight” on the events that took place: “There has been much conflicting information presented by various officials and the media regarding preparations and actions taken at the Capitol that day, and I would like to set the record straight from my perspective.”
Sund adds, “I also wish we had better intelligence and warnings as the possibility of this type of military-style armed insurrection. The entire intelligence community seems to have missed this.” Recently, there have been reports claiming that President Trump had offered ten thousand National Guard troops to be in DC on January 6th, but those offers went ignored. According to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, “That accountability needs to rest where it ultimately should be and that’s on Capitol Hill.”
No one missed this. I had conversations with friends on multiple occasions that something was going to happen. If the Intel communities actually missed this, then the U.S. is the most insecure nation on the planet. Sund adds, “I also wish we had better intelligence and warnings as the possibility of this type of military-style armed insurrection. The entire intelligence community seems to have missed this.” Recently, there have been reports claiming that President Trump had offered ten thousand National Guard troops to be in DC on January 6th, but those offers went ignored. According to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, “That accountability needs to rest where it ultimately should be and that’s on Capitol Hill.”
$1:
Former Chief Sund adds in his letter that many in the crowd that overtook the Capitol “were wearing radio earpieces indicating a high level of coordination,” while several others carried “weapons, chemical munitions, protective equipment, explosives and climbing gear.” These statements call into question the statements from the Democrats where they say the attack was spontaneous and caused by the words President Trump spoke that day, despite his call that supporters “peacefully and patriotically” make their voices heard by members of Congress.
They haven't been saying it's spontaneous. Have you been watching the trial? They're highlighting comments made not just after the election, but leading up to it for months to turn his supporters into rabid morons. Sund seems he isn't even aware of the case, so maybe he should shut the fuck up.$1:
The timing of the breach, 12:52 PM, is notable because President Trump did not conclude his speech until about 1:13 PM, making it impossible that the group that breached the Capitol did so under the former president’s direction. The fact that President Trump’s speech was given about 20-30 minutes’ walking distance from the Capitol makes it even less likely that his words caused the insurrection.
Oooo. You might want to check some time stamps on Trumps speech. 12:17 "After this we're going to walk down and I'll be with you. We have to show strength".30 minutes after 12:17 is 12:47. Also, does Sund think that words said a small distance away can't be, I dunno, transmitted digitally? You really think that people at the capitol weren't listening to his speech while it happened in real time? Get the fuck out of here.
$1:
Sund’s letter also states that the Capitol Police’s past experiences with “MAGA” rallies at the Capitol were handled successfully and peacefully with few if any, arrests or injuries.
Irrelevant. $1:
Huh, that sounds NOTHING like what the MSM and the Demonrats are telling everyone. Now, I don't know Sund or anything about him, but based on the MSM's PROVEN history of lying and manipulation, and the Democrats constant string of lies, spin and DISinformation, I'm willing to take Sund's words at face value. To put it this way, I'll take HIS word over some 2 bit 2 year member of Congress who stated she was there and in fear for her life, despite the fact she wasn't actually AT or in the Capitol building at all.
Keep drinking the trump kool-aid. And who wasn't at the capitol that said she was?
$1:
And if you seriously believe that some hard-core right-winger DEMANDED an all organic diet while in the pokey, I have about 25 sq miles of desert to sell you and I'll even throw in a bridge for free.
Just so we're clear, you think a statement made by the person's Lawyer, and uncontested by the person's lawyer, is made up by the media? $1:
No Tricks, we just witnessed something very similar to what happened to the Eastern European countries after 1945. A straight up power grab by the left. Not unlike our own little piece of shit who has a minority govt, lost the popular vote and STILL acts like a goddam dictator. Never mind the fact that lefties in Canada were MORE than happy to elect and re-elect a Quebec nationalist with a history of sexism, racism and cultural appropriation. But hey, Orange man bad. Or so the the left-wing propaganda units keeps telling you.
You're fucking delusional.
Tricks @ Thu Feb 11, 2021 8:53 am
https://www.justsecurity.org/74138/inci ... e-capitol/
Oh yeah he did nothing to stoke those flames. The 6th was also not mentioned at all beforehand. Not even by Trump himself.
Oh there was no pre-warning?
https://www.npr.org/2021/01/15/95684295 ... -january-6
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... story.html
Whoops, wrongo there too.
$1:
A day before rioters stormed Congress, an FBI office in Virginia issued an explicit warning that extremists were preparing to travel to Washington to commit violence and “war,” according to an internal document reviewed by The Washington Post that contradicts a senior official’s declaration the bureau had no intelligence indicating anyone at last week’s demonstrations in support of President Trump planned to do harm.
Oh but no one considered it right?
$1:
December 28, 2020: Former Trump White House official Olivia Troye says she is “very concerned that there will be violence on January 6th because the president himself encourages it.”
Hows your ass smell? Since you have your head firmly planted up it.
Tricks @ Thu Feb 11, 2021 9:00 am
But wait, there's more!
$1:
At a rally ahead of the Georgia Senate special election, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) says, “We will not go quietly into the night. We will defend liberty. And we are going to win.”
"We will not go quietly into the night" is literally a quote from a movie where they prepare their last defense in a fight against aliens. But no stoking of violence right?
$1:
Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio is arrested in Washington D.C. for burning a Black Lives Matter banner that he had taken from a Black church during December’s Stop the Steal rallies. He is found to be in possession of two high capacity firearm magazines, which is charged for possession.
At a pre-election rally in Georgia, Donald Trump, Jr., introducing his father, tells the crowd, “We need to fight.” President Trump then takes the stage, telling supporters, “They’re not taking this White House. We’re going to fight like hell.”
At a pre-election rally in Georgia, Donald Trump, Jr., introducing his father, tells the crowd, “We need to fight.” President Trump then takes the stage, telling supporters, “They’re not taking this White House. We’re going to fight like hell.”
So someone arrested two days before the event with firearms. AND Trump telling his followers to fight.
But no they didn't follow what he said right? And there was definitely no chance they were aware of it being worse.
You're actually brain dead.
Tricks @ Thu Feb 11, 2021 9:06 am
Oh you're talking about AOC! Stop reading newsweek, you clearly don't have enough firing neurons to determine that they're bullshit. She never said she was in the capitol building. She said she was in her office, and explained that it is NOT in the capitol building.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checkin ... 9951968706
Fuck you really suck at this whole "knowing what is true" thing don't you?