Canada Kicks Ass
Marriage official sues Sask. government over same-sex unions

REPLY



Newsbot @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:06 am

Title: Marriage official sues Sask. government over same-sex unions
Category: Misc CDN
Posted By: WDHIII
Date: 2008-11-25 09:00:14
Canadian

   



uwish @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:06 am

sorry, you have no right to offer an opinion. You must perform your job or quit.

It is the communist way isn't it?

   



BartSimpson @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:11 am

$1:
"What is next? Will the government be invading churches with their laws and forcing pastors and ministers and priests in churches to perform same-sex marriage ceremonies?"


I expect that it is. I also expect that Canada, like some European countries, will eventually prosecute non-muslims for hate speech violations when they preach against homosexuality and when they denounce homosexuals as sinners.

Muslims, of course, will continue to get a pass on their hatred.

   



lostalex @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:22 am

it's no different than a grocery worker refusing to sell a fat person a chicken breast. you are there to sell the product, not judge the person who is buying it.

i'm glad the courts punnished this religious bigot.

   



Zipperfish @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:23 am

I like the free market way myself. End government registration of marriages. Just shut the office down and hang a shingle that says "Gone Fishing." All marriages will be considered "common law" under the law and there will be no other kind of marriage. Then you can marry your boyfriend, girlfriend, boyfriend and girlfriend, or dog.

Get the government out of the bedrooms of the state.

   



herbie @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:25 am

uwish uwish:
sorry, you have no right to offer an opinion. You must perform your job or quit.

It is the communist way isn't it?


No it's the normal way.
Monkeys could do your job. Get back to work!

   



uwish @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:34 am

herbie?

nice to know you still cared!

   



Biblesmasher @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:13 am

He shouldnt have to pay anything but he should removed if he isnt upholding the law of the land.

   



Pseudonym @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:22 am

Biblesmasher Biblesmasher:
He shouldnt have to pay anything but he should removed if he isnt upholding the law of the land.

Seconded, but with the addendum that I think the law of the land is incorrect in this case.

   



hurley_108 @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:33 pm

If he wants to have his religion guide his work, he can quit and go work at a church - a religions organization. If he wants to work for the state - a secular organization - he can suck it up and do his job.

   



uwish @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:01 pm

ROTFL ROTFL ROTFL

love your sig line hurley!

ahh GAWD! you crack me up

   



Biblesmasher @ Tue Nov 25, 2008 7:31 pm

Pseudonym Pseudonym:
Biblesmasher Biblesmasher:
He shouldnt have to pay anything but he should removed if he isnt upholding the law of the land.

Seconded, but with the addendum that I think the law of the land is incorrect in this case.


You agree the law of the land should be upheld though. Excellent.

Personally I think the law of the land in this case couldnt be anymore correct.

   



REPLY