N. Korea to face new U.S. sanctions
Newsbot @ Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:13 pm
Title: N. Korea to face new U.S. sanctions
Category: Political
Posted By: wildrosegirl
Date: 2010-07-24 12:06:07
GreenTiger @ Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:13 pm
I would like ti see an incease in aid to the DPRK.
We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.
Zipperfish @ Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:21 pm
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
I would like ti see an incease in aid to the DPRK.
We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.
We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.
And then what?
GreenTiger @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:19 am
Well he isn't doing anything more than blowing gas out his anus as usual. If we do something stupid we could close camp 22, and start to feed his people and hopefully unite Korea under a decent Government. They deserve it.
Zipperfish @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:03 am
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
Well he isn't doing anything more than blowing gas out his anus as usual. If we do something stupid we could close camp 22, and start to feed his people and hopefully unite Korea under a decent Government. They deserve it.
I don't think you've really thought this through.
CrazyCanuck007 @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:23 am
Funny how the US thinks it's ok for N. Korea, and Pakistan to have Nukes, but heaven forbid if Iran wants to have nuclear power plants....
But then, N. Korea and Pakistan would put up a hell of a fight if invaded...
BartSimpson @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:30 am
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
I would like ti see an incease in aid to the DPRK.
We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.
We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.
And then what?
Then we spend a few trillion dollars waging the ground war and then rebuilding the country.
No, we should not take any aggressive action towards them. Let them make the first move and then we pound them...hard. After it's done we let the South Koreans go in and run the place after holding war crimes trials and executing the DPRK leadership.
Zipperfish @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:38 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Then we spend a few trillion dollars waging the ground war and then rebuilding the country.
No, we should not take any aggressive action towards them. Let them make the first move and then we pound them...hard. After it's done we let the South Koreans go in and run the place after holding war crimes trials and executing the DPRK leadership.
No, we should not take any aggressive action towards them. Let them make the first move and then we pound them...hard. After it's done we let the South Koreans go in and run the place after holding war crimes trials and executing the DPRK leadership.
They've already made the first move. They sunk a military South Korean vessel killing--what?--48 soldiers. I think South Korea needs to grow a pair, myself.
BartSimpson @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:52 am
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
They've already made the first move. They sunk a military South Korean vessel killing--what?--48 soldiers. I think South Korea needs to grow a pair, myself.
The South Koreans didn't want to go into this unilaterally. They needed both US backing of what they need to do and then they need the Chinese to stay out of it when Lil' Kim ends up with his forces backed up to the Yalu River. Don't want any repeats of 60 years ago.
Zipperfish @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:29 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The South Koreans didn't want to go into this unilaterally. They needed both US backing of what they need to do and then they need the Chinese to stay out of it when Lil' Kim ends up with his forces backed up to the Yalu River. Don't want any repeats of 60 years ago.
I don't think China will stay out of it.
BartSimpson @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:56 am
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The South Koreans didn't want to go into this unilaterally. They needed both US backing of what they need to do and then they need the Chinese to stay out of it when Lil' Kim ends up with his forces backed up to the Yalu River. Don't want any repeats of 60 years ago.
I don't think China will stay out of it.
Then their economy will go in the sh*tter when the US Navy blockades their ports. This is not the 1950's and if Chinese troops engage US troops in Korea then the party will be on.
Tman1 @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:57 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Then their economy will go in the sh*tter when the US Navy blockades their ports.
Besides the fact that trade is a global invention, as well as China not sitting on their heinies if a blockade commences, the U.S' economy (already in the sh*itter as it is) would be even worse off since the U.S imports more from China and China has the U.S by the nuts with their debt but that's irrelevant right? You're right, this isn't the 1950's. China has nukes and thousands of missiles that could aim right at your blockade. An enemy that can fight would be new for the U.S in this day and age.
HyperionTheEvil @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:10 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The South Koreans didn't want to go into this unilaterally. They needed both US backing of what they need to do and then they need the Chinese to stay out of it when Lil' Kim ends up with his forces backed up to the Yalu River. Don't want any repeats of 60 years ago.
I don't think China will stay out of it.
Then their economy will go in the sh*tter when the US Navy blockades their ports. This is not the 1950's and if Chinese troops engage US troops in Korea then the party will be on.
HyperionTheEvil @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:12 pm
Tman1 Tman1:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Then their economy will go in the sh*tter when the US Navy blockades their ports.
Besides the fact that trade is a global invention, as well as China not sitting on their heinies if a blockade commences, the U.S' economy (already in the sh*itter as it is) would be even worse off since the U.S imports more from China and China has the U.S by the nuts with their debt but that's irrelevant right? You're right, this isn't the 1950's. China has nukes and thousands of missiles that could aim right at your blockade. An enemy that can fight would be new for the U.S in this day and age.
Don't confuse poor Bart with with things like reality, he doesn't react well to it
GreenTiger @ Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:52 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
I would like ti see an incease in aid to the DPRK.
We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.
We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.
And then what?
Then we spend a few trillion dollars waging the ground war and then rebuilding the country.
No, we should not take any aggressive action towards them. Let them make the first move and then we pound them...hard. After it's done we let the South Koreans go in and run the place after holding war crimes trials and executing the DPRK leadership.
You right Bart, to me the Mighty Midget is an annoying mosquito that needs to be swatted. If they are stupid enough to start anything only the South Koreans would have the moral authority to deal with the DPRK leadership.
I would like the Tomb of Kim what every the F his name is turned into a public urinal or better a public mental hospital to treat the victims of the regime.