RAPE VICTIM SENTENCED TO 90 LASHES IN SAUDI ARABIA
BartSimpson @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:01 am
From: http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/? ... MwZDIzMjQ=
$1:
A Saudi court has sentenced the victim of a gang rape to 90 lashes of the whip because she was alone in a car with a man to whom she was not married at the time she was raped. The male friend of the rape victim was also sentenced to 90 lashes for being alone with her in the car. The four Saudis convicted of rape were sentenced to prison terms. A fifth man who watched while he filmed the rape on his mobile phone still faces investigation. (This story was reported by the German news agency DPA).
Clogeroo @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:21 am
$1:
So tell me again why Saudi Arabia gets a pass in this war on terrorism thingy?
You think people are going to want to open three major fronts? Like the Americans would support a war with Saudi Arabia they couldn’t even handle Iraq.
Delwin @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:40 am
Still waiting to Hear from our new found champion of human rights on this one. Of course, critisizing the Saudi's isn't going to impact our economy the way his critisism of China might. Way to pick our battles for us Mr.Harper.
RUEZ @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:42 am
Delwin Delwin:
Still waiting to Hear from our new found champion of human rights on this one. Of course, critisizing the Saudi's isn't going to impact our economy the way his critisism of China might. Way to pick our battles for us Mr.Harper.
Grow up dumbass.
BartSimpson @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:46 am
Delwin Delwin:
Still waiting to Hear from our new found champion of human rights on this one. Of course, critisizing the Saudi's isn't going to impact our economy the way his critisism of China might. Way to pick our battles for us Mr.Harper.
The news just broke so you might want to give Harper a couple of hours to research this before he says anything. By tomorrow I would expect a statement, of course.
Clogeroo @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:47 am
$1:
Still waiting to Hear from our new found champion of human rights on this one. Of course, critisizing the Saudi's isn't going to impact our economy the way his critisism of China might. Way to pick our battles for us Mr.Harper.
Oh I'm not standing up for the Saudis. By all means they are a bunch of yahoos. But who exactly is going to back a war against them? Canada is stretched in Afghanistan as it is. It is unlikely the Americans will either. Patience is a virtue Delwin.
BartSimpson @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:47 am
lily lily:
So tell me again why Saudi Arabia gets a pass in this war on terrorism thingy?
Because they own so many US & Canadian politicians.
Delwin @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:48 am
RUEZ RUEZ:
Delwin Delwin:
Still waiting to Hear from our new found champion of human rights on this one. Of course, critisizing the Saudi's isn't going to impact our economy the way his critisism of China might. Way to pick our battles for us Mr.Harper.
Grow up dumbass.
RUEZ @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:54 am
Delwin Delwin:
RUEZ RUEZ:
Delwin Delwin:
Still waiting to Hear from our new found champion of human rights on this one. Of course, critisizing the Saudi's isn't going to impact our economy the way his critisism of China might. Way to pick our battles for us Mr.Harper.
Grow up dumbass.
Delwin @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:05 am
RUEZ RUEZ:
Delwin Delwin:
RUEZ RUEZ:
Delwin Delwin:
Still waiting to Hear from our new found champion of human rights on this one. Of course, critisizing the Saudi's isn't going to impact our economy the way his critisism of China might. Way to pick our battles for us Mr.Harper.
Grow up dumbass.http://www.canadaka.net/modules.php?nam ... ic&t=19392
You should really check your facts before you run off at the mouth. I believe my post is a contribution. I am making the point that Harper chose to critisze our 2nd largest trading partner for human rights, when he has been silent on other countries records, including our first largest trading partner.
If you disagree with that you should probably learn to articulate it a little better. You dumb, stupid, stupid poopy head, just doesn't carry a lot of weight.
RUEZ @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:13 am
Delwin Delwin:
If you disagree with that you should probably learn to articulate it a little better. You dumb, stupid, stupid poopy head,
Grow up.
BartSimpson @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:59 pm
What? No one's called me a bigot for posing this? C'mon, where are all the liberal apologists? Let's hear the usual suspects defend this. I'm waiting. 
2Cdo @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:02 pm
Okay Bart just for you, You're a bigotted, Islamophobe! 
Feel better now. Just don't call me a liberal. 
I'm kind of curious where they are myself? After all, isn't this all George Bushs' fault?
Tricks @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:07 pm
Wait for it. They just haven't came on yet, they sleep during the day....
Delwin @ Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:16 pm
2Cdo 2Cdo:
Okay Bart just for you, You're a bigotted, Islamophobe! Feel better now. Just don't call me a liberal.
I'm kind of curious where they are myself? After all, isn't this all George Bushs' fault?
Well, let's face it, Bushes "special relationship" with the Saudi's do give them some extra perks in the area of human rights. Feel better now. Just don't call me a liberal. I'm kind of curious where they are myself? After all, isn't this all George Bushs' fault?
$1:
How are the Bushes compromised? In House of Bush, House of Saud, I trace more than $1.4 billion in contracts and investments from the House of Saud to companies in which the Bushes and their friends have had key roles. (Michael Moore uses this figure in Fahrenheit 9/11.) Saudi money bailed out Harken Energy when George W. Bush was on its board of directors. That's how he made his fortune. Bush 41 and James Baker traveled to Saudi Arabia repeatedly for the Carlyle Group to woo Saudi investors and win contracts. The Bush family remains close to Prince Bandar, even though Bandar's wife actually funded two 9/11 hijackers -- indirectly and inadvertently, of course. Indirect and inadvertent -- that's the Saudi way.
http://www.saudi-us-relations.org/newsl ... 08-04.html