Canada Kicks Ass
Taliban 'losing momentum'

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  Next



RPW @ Tue May 20, 2008 10:26 pm

Wow! You must work for Harper. That's right out of his "little red book" .......

So, just because Canadians are a volunteer force, the ones who suffer from PTSD can "go suck"? That's sick.

Tell ya what.....let's just let the future decide who's "right".

   



ridenrain @ Wed May 21, 2008 6:55 am

You're dodging the basic fact.
If they didn't want to go, they wouldn't volunteer and they wouldn't be there.

And that's not out of Harper's play book, that's out of Chretien and Marten's because they started, supported and believed in the mission far longer that Harper has.. or did you forget that fact?

   



RPW @ Wed May 21, 2008 7:37 am

ridenrain ridenrain:
You're dodging the basic fact.
If they didn't want to go, they wouldn't volunteer and they wouldn't be there.

So that gives us licence to treat them like dirt when they get home.........? That gives us licence to make money off this war, and throw the vets who need help in the gutter?

ridenrain ridenrain:
And that's not out of Harper's play book, that's out of Chretien and Marten's because they started, supported and believed in the mission far longer that Harper has.. or did you forget that fact?
Mulroney/Chretien/Martin/Harper may as well be clones...........

   



mtbr @ Wed May 21, 2008 7:48 am

Jack Layton will save us from war and misery!

   



ridenrain @ Wed May 21, 2008 7:53 am

RPW RPW:
ridenrain ridenrain:
You're dodging the basic fact.
If they didn't want to go, they wouldn't volunteer and they wouldn't be there.

So that gives us licence to treat them like dirt when they get home.........? That gives us licence to make money off this war, and throw the vets who need help in the gutter?

ridenrain ridenrain:
And that's not out of Harper's play book, that's out of Chretien and Marten's because they started, supported and believed in the mission far longer that Harper has.. or did you forget that fact?
Mulroney/Chretien/Martin/Harper may as well be clones...........


What proof do you have that our troops are being treated like dirt?

   



CanAm1 @ Wed May 21, 2008 8:26 am

RPW RPW:
Wow! You must work for Harper. That's right out of his "little red book" .......


The Red Book was a Liberal publication. Full of nasty little surprises, like hidden taxes. XD

   



Schleihauf @ Wed May 21, 2008 2:16 pm

I find it funny that people compare us to the soviets. One key difference: most Afghans want us there(wish I could say the same for Canadians).

   



CanAm1 @ Wed May 21, 2008 6:54 pm

Funny you say that most Iraqi's want the Yanks there too.

   



RPW @ Wed May 21, 2008 7:15 pm

ridenrain ridenrain:
What proof do you have that our troops are being treated like dirt?

To quote you from a previous post:
$1:
Both are in english you can find both of those on line if you're crafty.

   



RPW @ Wed May 21, 2008 7:16 pm

CanAm1 CanAm1:
RPW RPW:
Wow! You must work for Harper. That's right out of his "little red book" .......


The Red Book was a Liberal publication. Full of nasty little surprises, like hidden taxes. XD


Like I said, just like Harper.............

   



commanderkai @ Wed May 21, 2008 7:31 pm

RPW RPW:
CanAm1 CanAm1:
RPW RPW:
Wow! You must work for Harper. That's right out of his "little red book" .......


The Red Book was a Liberal publication. Full of nasty little surprises, like hidden taxes. XD


Like I said, just like Harper.............


We got new taxes? Man where are you getting this from?

   



ridenrain @ Wed May 21, 2008 7:37 pm

He makes it up. Just like his claims of troops are being treated like dirt.
The only people who are treating the troops like dirt are those on the left.

   



RPW @ Wed May 21, 2008 8:06 pm

commanderkai commanderkai:
We got new taxes? Man where are you getting this from?

A tax by any other name......is still a tax. I would suggest you actually do some reading.......if you are "crafty enough".

   



RPW @ Wed May 21, 2008 8:08 pm

ridenrain ridenrain:
He makes it up. Just like his claims of troops are being treated like dirt.
Only PTSD victims............
ridenrain ridenrain:
The only people who are treating the troops like dirt are those on the left.
....while the right fills their pockets, walking on the skulls of the dead

   



commanderkai @ Wed May 21, 2008 8:13 pm

RPW RPW:
commanderkai commanderkai:
We got new taxes? Man where are you getting this from?

A tax by any other name......is still a tax. I would suggest you actually do some reading.......if you are "crafty enough".


Umm...I'm asking what the flying fuck you're talking about. We got a GST cut, and the Toronto Star (a leftist rag) went on about huge tax cuts for the wealthy and such...here

http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/272037

"With surpluses this year and next projected to average an astounding $16.5 billion, Flaherty has committed almost $5 billion to tax cuts this year and almost $60 billion in cuts over the next five years. Of this, $34.2 billion will come from cutting the goods and services tax from 6 per cent to 5 per cent. An extra $11 billion will come from personal income tax cuts, and $14.4 billion from corporate tax cuts. Also, $10 billion of this year's surplus will be used to pay down the federal debt."

Is there a tax hike that I'm missing? I'm not trying to be rude, but I want to know a real news article. I only found one from 2 years ago, which says that taxes weren't cut as much as advertised.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ ... login=true

"The federal government's recent budget chopped personal taxes by about half as much as was advertised and actually lowered take-home pay for many Canadians, a new report by a leading economist says. The report, to be released Tuesday, says the budget will mean personal tax cuts worth about $9.5-billion over the next two years, when compared with current rates. By contrast, the government said in its first budget earlier this month that it had cut personal taxes by $19."

Now I don't really know about the take home pay, since honestly its a two year old article

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  Next