Tims workers, fired after robbery, want jobs back
Newsbot @ Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:10 am
Title: Tims workers, fired after robbery, want jobs back
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: Benn
Date: 2009-09-19 07:29:32
Canadian
Benn @ Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:10 am
"“When working shifts that fall between dusk and dawn you are not permitted to leave the store for any reason except to complete management approved garbage drops,”
Broke the rules ladies and you got taken for 160 bucks. Hope the cancer stick was worth it!
I mean yes the management had not fixed the latch to lock the window, but knowing that they still left the store alone, just prove more poor judgment in their part.
stokes @ Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:11 am
Why would both employees take a break at the same time???
They deserved to get fired.
Benn @ Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:15 am
Its no wonder some kids don't respect authority or take responsibility these days when their parents are breaking rules and when they get burnt doing it they whine "not my fault."
If you're not willing to own up and buck up and take the consequences of breaking a rule then don't break it. Actually DUH, don't break it in the first place maybe!
Ripcat @ Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:22 am
I'll be in that town on Monday, Maybe I'll drive thru for a coffe and ask if the window has been fixed yet....
Canadian_Mind @ Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:23 am
lol
dummies, deserve what you got.
1Peg @ Sat Sep 19, 2009 10:07 am
stokes stokes:
Why would both employees take a break at the same time???
They deserved to get fired.
They deserved to get fired.
To create an opportunity for a "hooded" man to rob them?
Regina @ Sat Sep 19, 2009 10:23 am
stokes stokes:
Why would both employees take a break at the same time???
They only had one brain between them and they need it to smoke a butt.
commanderkai @ Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:58 am
Both employees deserve to be fired, yes, but Timmies deserved the robbery for not fixing the lock.
Canadian_Mind @ Sat Sep 19, 2009 1:13 pm
Hitler_Elvis Hitler_Elvis:
It's an issue of integrity. If the window lock had been repaired (as per store and franchise policy) no theft would or could have occurred. A court of law would reinstate the employees with costs.
Hopefully business will suffer (severely) for Timmies. Besides McDonalds has good coffee and locations, I will be buying me coffee there from now on.
Hopefully business will suffer (severely) for Timmies. Besides McDonalds has good coffee and locations, I will be buying me coffee there from now on.
If one of the shift workers was in the store, no theft would or could have occured.
It's people like you that totally fucked up the justic system in this country.
MAC1767 @ Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:18 am
maybe they will boycot TIMS, cant see that, someone was watching them do this for a while, and took advantage, sucks to be them.
ASLplease @ Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:54 am
Lets imagine that they were inside at the time, Timmies has a policy that employee are not to interfere with a theif. So, in that sense, this issue should have nothing to do with the robbery, it is strictly an issue of smoke breaks.
BartSimpson @ Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:09 pm
Requiring employees to stay in the store during their breaks and their lunch time is illegal down here. Is this right that employers can tell you folks where you can take your breaks and your lunch time?