Two explosions at Brussels airport
Brenda @ Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:41 am
#jesuissickofthisshit
Brenda Brenda:
#jesuissickofthisshit
It's going to get worse. A lot worse.
Strutz @ Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:13 am
CTV site is indicating that at least one of the blasts at the airport is being blamed on a suicide bomber.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/blasts-at-brussels-airport-subway-at-least-31-dead-1.2826965
This is horrific.
They've been waiting and expecting something to happen and of course, it did. Where will the next group of innocent people be slaughtered for absolutely no reason?
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Brenda Brenda:
#jesuissickofthisshit
It's going to get worse. A lot worse.

We have no idea.
Meanwhile, in Jordan.
http://www.euronews.com/2016/03/22/eu-f ... -bombings/EU foreign policy chief Mogherini weeps over Brussels bombingsAnd just who is this woman, now crying on the podium ?
$1:
Mogherini has caused controversy since her appointment to the European Commission by stating publicly that Islam is part of Europe's history and future. In a speech[17] in Brussels on 24 June 2015, she said -
Islam holds a place in our Western societies. Islam belongs in Europe. It holds a place in Europe's history, in our culture, in our food and - what matters most - in Europe's present and future. Like it or not, this is the reality.
Yes, this is exactly the kind of leadership that Europe has. It's an absolute crime.
Strutz Strutz:
CTV site is indicating that at least one of the blasts at the airport is being blamed on a suicide bomber.
They've been waiting and expecting something to happen and of course, it did. Where will the next group of innocent people be slaughtered for absolutely no reason?
Sky News in the UK had a reporter at the airport when it happened.
It took 5 minutes for the story to come out about gunfire, men shouting in Arabic.
That was 8-9 hours ago.
After the first bomb went off, people of course ran the other way --
right into the second guy.
Nice tactics.
Abdesalam had a crew of about 30 jihadis, supported by the local criminal gangs.
Next ?
Probably Germany.
The treasonous cowards at NBC wasted no time in diverting attention from the pig-sucking terrorists:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-dr ... ing-europe
$1:
After Belgium Attacks, NBC Warns of ‘Rise of the Right Wing’ in Europe
During NBC’s breaking news coverage of the terrorist attacks in Belgium Tuesday morning, correspondents Andrea Mitchell and Richard Engel wasted no time warning of the “rise of the right wing” throughout Europe in response to such attacks.
In a special report just before 7 a.m. ET, Mitchell worried: “This is going to have big implications for the migration crisis in Germany and elsewhere because there is a popular notion that migrants are somehow connected with the terror threat. Whether or not that's true, that is the reality.” She added: “And there has been most recently last week in Germany, a bad election for Angela Merkel with the right-wing parties gaining strength...”
Later on Today, in the 8 a.m ET hour, Engel decried similar political fallout:
We're already seeing the rise of the right wing. We're already seeing rise of hate attacks, where people will use the kind of terrorist attacks, these kind of incidents, to vilify all of the Muslim community. Which, of course, only makes the situation worse. Because then people feel isolated, ostracized, ghettoized, and they retreat into their own communities.
In sharp contrast to those declarations, earlier in the 8 a.m. ET hour, correspondent Tom Costello, who had family living in Belgium, voiced the concerns of many in Europe:
I think if you talk to Belgians, and I know many of them because they’re family members, they will tell you that over the last 20-25 years they have felt like they are losing their country. They have felt like because Belgium has such an open immigration policy over the last half century in which they have really allowed almost anybody, especially from these areas that are now breeding terrorism, they’ve allowed these people to come in as refugees, and yet, many of them are not being thoroughly vetted. They are given a rather generous social stipend to live off of. And the Belgians – many Belgians feel like this is now the – they're bearing the fruits of that policy, where they are seeing this kind of terrorism in Belgium.
More at the link.
martin14 martin14:
Abdesalam had a crew of about 30 jihadis, supported by the local criminal gangs.
No, there's a network of jihadis who use criminal enterprises to fund the activities of their fellow jihadis.
Those 'local criminal gangs' are also Muslims who are aiding and abetting terror by financing it, equipping it, aiding it, hiding it, sheltering it, feeding it, recruiting for it, and evangelizing it.
In the military we'd call such people our 'logistics chain'.
They had a similar problem in the UK with the IRA in the 70s and 80s.....they called them Americans.
Novel bit of info from the NYT:
$1:
“This shows the limits of the actions you can undertake in a state of emergency,” said Philippe Hayez, a former official with the D.G.S.E., the French external intelligence service.
“These are time-specific, superficial,” added Mr. Hayez, who has written extensively on Europe’s intelligence challenges. “But unless you occupy it militarily, you don’t hold a town just by circulating police cars. We’re talking about guerrilla terrorism. And there’s a population that’s complicit.”
And there's a population that's complicit.Things are definitely changing in Europe.
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The treasonous cowards at NBC wasted no time in diverting attention from the pig-sucking terrorists:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-dr ... ing-europe$1:
After Belgium Attacks, NBC Warns of ‘Rise of the Right Wing’ in Europe
During NBC’s breaking news coverage of the terrorist attacks in Belgium Tuesday morning, correspondents Andrea Mitchell and Richard Engel wasted no time warning of the “rise of the right wing” throughout Europe in response to such attacks.
In a special report just before 7 a.m. ET, Mitchell worried: “This is going to have big implications for the migration crisis in Germany and elsewhere because there is a popular notion that migrants are somehow connected with the terror threat. Whether or not that's true, that is the reality.” She added: “And there has been most recently last week in Germany, a bad election for Angela Merkel with the right-wing parties gaining strength...”
Later on Today, in the 8 a.m ET hour, Engel decried similar political fallout:
We're already seeing the rise of the right wing. We're already seeing rise of hate attacks, where people will use the kind of terrorist attacks, these kind of incidents, to vilify all of the Muslim community. Which, of course, only makes the situation worse. Because then people feel isolated, ostracized, ghettoized, and they retreat into their own communities.
In sharp contrast to those declarations, earlier in the 8 a.m. ET hour, correspondent Tom Costello, who had family living in Belgium, voiced the concerns of many in Europe:
I think if you talk to Belgians, and I know many of them because they’re family members, they will tell you that over the last 20-25 years they have felt like they are losing their country. They have felt like because Belgium has such an open immigration policy over the last half century in which they have really allowed almost anybody, especially from these areas that are now breeding terrorism, they’ve allowed these people to come in as refugees, and yet, many of them are not being thoroughly vetted. They are given a rather generous social stipend to live off of. And the Belgians – many Belgians feel like this is now the – they're bearing the fruits of that policy, where they are seeing this kind of terrorism in Belgium.
More at the link.
Reminds me of Tom Clancy's Sum of all fears. They replaced the Arab terrorists in the story with a bunch of old right wing nationalists because they didn't want to offend the sand bandit population.
andyt @ Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:47 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Novel bit of info from the NYT:
$1:
“This shows the limits of the actions you can undertake in a state of emergency,” said Philippe Hayez, a former official with the D.G.S.E., the French external intelligence service.
“These are time-specific, superficial,” added Mr. Hayez, who has written extensively on Europe’s intelligence challenges. “But unless you occupy it militarily, you don’t hold a town just by circulating police cars. We’re talking about guerrilla terrorism. And there’s a population that’s complicit.”
And there's a population that's complicit.Things are definitely changing in Europe.
I doubt that's a surprise to anybody. I also doubt he meant the whole Muslim population the way you think.
So what's to be done? Can't deport them. The only remedy I see in your way of thinking is Konzentrationslager. And of course green crescent arm bands for those not yet shipped.
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
They had a similar problem in the UK with the IRA in the 70s and 80s.....they called them Americans.
Yes, my grandmother was one of them. She sent tens of thousands to the IRA.
She also had her entire remaining family in Galway slaughtered by British troops during the 1912 road building campaign. Her parents, brother Thomas, his wife, and his children were all killed when Thomas refused to have the family go out to work as slave labor.
Don't get me wrong, I love the Brits of today. But the Brits sowed a deep field of hatred in Ireland and they reaped an appropriate harvest.
andyt andyt:
So what's to be done? Can't deport them.
Yes, you can. You simply have to be willing to do it.
The Europeans a few hundred years ago deported millions of Muslims and they can do it again if they're motivated enough to do it.
andyt @ Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:52 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
But the Brits Yanks sowed a deep field of hatred in Ireland Iraq and they reaped an (in)appropriate harvest.
Updated that for you.
andyt @ Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:54 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
andyt andyt:
So what's to be done? Can't deport them.
Yes, you can. You simply have to be willing to do it.
The Europeans a few hundred years ago deported millions of Muslims and they can do it again if they're motivated enough to do it.
Not a country that would take them. Especially all the European born ones. It would also wreak havoc with Europe's rule of law. Probably doesn't bother you much as long as the right is running things.
andyt andyt:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
But the Brits Yanks sowed a deep field of hatred in Ireland Iraq and they reaped an (in)appropriate harvest.
Updated that for you.
Anymore I would have let Iraq keep Kuwait back in 1991 and I would not have risked even one American life to protect the ungrateful Wahhabi vermin in Saudi Arabia. The Middle East would probably be a better place with Saddam Hussein running Iraq, Kuwait, and SA.