Victims of moose-car crashes may sue
Newsbot @ Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:34 am
Title: Victims of moose-car crashes may sue
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: QBall
Date: 2010-10-19 07:04:45
Canadian
CrazyNewfie @ Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:34 am
WTF, I am a NFLDer and I think this is rediculous. How can the government today be liable for decisions made by a govt 100 YEARS AGO? This is just plain stupid!
CrazyNewfie @ Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:34 am
WTF, I am a NFLDer and I think this is rediculous. How can the government today be liable for decisions made by a govt 100 YEARS AGO? This is just plain stupid!
canuckns @ Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:37 am
That is absolutely absurd.
Yogi @ Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:41 am
Crosbie says the purpose of the class action would be compensation for the injured and measures to reduce or prevent future accidents.
![[huh]](./images/smilies/icon_scratch.gif "huh?"){kind=icon}
Just how the hell does he propose to do this??? Make sure every moose receives, reads, understands, a copy of the traffic safety laws and promises to abide by them!!!
IDIOT!
raydan @ Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:42 pm
In related news, family and descendants of all Europeen smokers will take on a class-action suit against France because Jean Nicot, French ambassador to Portugal, sent it as a medicine to the court of Catherine de Medici in 1559.
QBall @ Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:06 pm
Yogi Yogi:
Crosbie says the purpose of the class action would be compensation for the injured and measures to reduce or prevent future accidents.
Just how the hell does he propose to do this??? Make sure every moose receives, reads, understands, a copy of the traffic safety laws and promises to abide by them!!!
IDIOT!
Just how the hell does he propose to do this??? Make sure every moose receives, reads, understands, a copy of the traffic safety laws and promises to abide by them!!!
IDIOT!
Oh, I doubt he wants that. I'm sure he just wants the government to get the moose to cross the road at the moose crossing signs.
Seriously when they write the book on how society crumbled I'm sure lawyers will be to blame.
DrCaleb @ Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:07 pm
Pretty sure the moose don't have any money.
raydan @ Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:10 pm
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
Pretty sure the moose don't have any money.
I can't wait to see them in court.
Brenda @ Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:15 pm
$1:
He says if the hazard that the huge animals pose to traffic was foreseeable 100 years ago, government could be held liable for negligence.
Yeah, they sure should have known, since the first car drove the roads in 1903. I mean, seriously, how could they NOT have seen this coming??
PublicAnimalNo9 @ Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:35 am
I think we should have a class action lawsuit against all these fuckwit lawyers that create nuisance lawsuits.
andyt @ Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:37 am
CrazyNewfie CrazyNewfie:
WTF, I am a NFLDer and I think this is rediculous. How can the government today be liable for decisions made by a govt 100 YEARS AGO? This is just plain stupid!
Compensation for Chinese Head tax, Residential schools settlements. Need I go on?
NewfieBullet @ Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:46 am
