Canada Kicks Ass
12,000 troops to guard Canadian border, U.S. urged

REPLY

1  2  Next



whelan costen @ Wed Sep 13, 2006 10:38 pm

<strong>Written By:</strong> whelan costen
<strong>Date:</strong> 2006-09-13 22:38:00
<a href="/article/223820934-12000-troops-to-guard-canadian-border-us-urged">Article Link</a>

Mr. Stone and four retired military and border-patrol officials named by Mr. Norwood have recommended the deployment of 8,000 National Guard soldiers to secure the border with Canada, including round-the-clock surveillance of 1,000 hard-surface roads crossing the border that are currently not patrolled.

In a 22-page report, the task force says that these unmanned roads "currently provide . . . quick exit for intruders."
Read the rest:
<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060913.BORDER13/TPStory/TPInternational/America/">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060913.BORDER13/TPStory/TPInternational/America/</a>







[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 14, 2006]

   



RPW @ Wed Sep 13, 2006 10:53 pm

12,000 troops to guard Canadian border, and Canada Customs to get firearms.............should prove interesting!

---
"Son, if you wanna get ahead in this world, never work for another man as long as you live."

   



rearguard @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:27 am

If a draft is implemented in the US, all of this otherwise insanely useless border security suddenly will make sense.

   



Milton @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:15 am

US Troops massing on our border, hmmm, sounds familiar.

---

"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
(Albert Einstein)

   



Wraun @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:30 am

I guess they're not happy with a bloodless takeover, they still want to win the war of 1812. That's okay, we might not have the fire power they do but we got more than Iraq had so we should do fine. Maybe we should set a date for burning down the white house, whad'ya think?

;>)

---
Canada for Canadians

   



Patm @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:11 am

Wag the dog

Make it hard to go back and forth between the two countries then suddenly come up with a "new" plan to open up the border: US takeover of our borders and immigration to ensure "terrists" cannot get in, then the border can be eliminated.

Gee, that sounds kinda familiar, don't you think?

   



DL @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:23 am

Who's trying to sneak into the US all of a sudden, sneak out is more like it? Unless they knock out the same satellite bringing us Survivor and news of Britney’s baby no one will blink at troops on the border. The MSM will continue to read what’s on the little screen, but if it doesn't fit with what's out the window one or two might furrow a brow, or dare to let their smile dip. . <br />
Can we bring our troops back from Afghanistan and put them on the border please? If they bring on the US draft, then we can use our troops to liberate draft dodgers and smuggle them to safety. Offer Canadian uniforms to them and fix the recruitment problem at the same time, only keep our troops IN Canada. Fly planes in to pick up the Katrina in planes clearly marked with terrorist logos and Norad won’t interfere. Bring them back here, offer jobs on border patrol, and address the sovereignty problem at the same time, open a few new Coke Cola plants, luxuriate in to boon of spin-off industry? Coke plants = hope and prosperity. Pop, new uniforms, training camps, and new housing (softwood lumber solution ;-)) clothing and food for everyone. Let's see, I don't envision Harper or the merry band of Great Canadian sellouts in this new Canada, so let's just say a young and impressionable internet enthusiast was steered towards a map, more than a paint ball gun, and a 8x10 glossy of the head of "Canada’s New Government". <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ottawabusinessjournal.com/331808260821279.php">http://www.ottawabusinessjournal.com/331808260821279.php</a><br />
<br />
“The moniker is now "Canada's New Government," to be used, according to a memo distributed through one federal department last week..."<br />
OK, I am loosing it here. But how much more bizarre is Bush explaining on TV, the necessity benefits of “expert questioning” in the now admitted secret CIA prisons. Or US troops on the Canada US border. Or the US air force Chief advocating testing a new weapon of US mobs first before using it on the enemy publicly (see Diogenes submission). It’s heads out of the sand time here folks. The masters of the new Twilight Zone aren’t even trying to hide their crazy anymore, and the deafening silence in the face of such bold faced crazy statements is just the bring it on put us in chains signal that the crazies have been waiting for.<br />

   



RPW @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:30 am

But not in the summer. The humidity in ol' Foggy Bottom is a killer, and it plays hell on the wool uniforms........

---
"Son, if you wanna get ahead in this world, never work for another man as long as you live."

   



RPW @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:32 am

The programon CBC TV on Sunday, 10th September, mentioned that the US was building 14 permanent bases in Iraq. That just about <b>demands</b> a draft.............<p>---<br>"Son, if you wanna get ahead in this world, never work for another man as long as you live."

   



RPW @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:36 am

<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/09/13/shots-dawson.html">http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/09/13/shots-dawson.html</a><br />
Woman, gunman dead in Montreal school rampage<br />
<br />
<br />
Canada MUST harbour (sorry, I meant harbor - have to get used to this newspeak) terrorists. They got one in Montreal yesterday............<p>---<br>"Son, if you wanna get ahead in this world, never work for another man as long as you live."

   



Wraun @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:05 am

That's a good point, will we be persecuted for inserting u's into words like harbor, favor, or neighbor?
Look what the catholics did to the natives... they were only trying to integrate them into the new white society.

---
Canada for Canadians

   



Jesse @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:15 am

Get your terminology right; the montreal gunman wasn't a terrorist, unless he happened to be hired by some foreign government... <blockquote> terrorist: "One who utilizes the systematic use of violence and intimidation to achieve political objectives, while disguised as a civilian non-combatant." </blockquote> Note that it does not mean "witch" or "communist", either. <p>---<br>"Beer Garden'? You mean, a real garden of beer? I thought they only had those in Canada!" --Largo

   



Deacon @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:17 am

What, are they afraid we'll come back after nearly 200 years and burn the white house down again?

considering just who and what lives there currently, that wouldn't be such a bad idea.

---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

"The Weapon" - Rush

   



Dr Caleb @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:44 am

Careful Deacon! Just warning you of Canada's willingness to extradite people for violating US law! Specifically for threats against a sitting Belezebub.


---
"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

   



Jay Spark @ Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:39 am

"Make it hard to go back and forth between the two countries then suddenly come up with a "new" plan to open up the border"


Good point, Pat. I think we ought to encourage Charlie Norwood and the proponents of tighter borders and slower inspections. It might stalemate, or at least slow down the Canadian annexationist traitors!

   



REPLY

1  2  Next