Canada Kicks Ass
EI overhaul underhanded

REPLY



Newsbot @ Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:05 pm

<strong>Title: </strong> <a href="/article/235929636-ei-overhaul-underhanded" target="_blank">EI overhaul underhanded</a>
<strong>Category:</strong> <a href="/topics/36-canadian-politics" target="_blank">Canadian Politics</a>
<strong>Written By: </strong> <a href="/profiles/Rural" target="_blank">Rural</a>
<strong>Date: </strong> Saturday, March 08 at 11:51<br><br>
<p>Extract....</p>
<p><span>In a nutshell, the shell game is this: When EI shifts from government program to Crown corporation, its $54-billion accounting surplus is going to get lost in the shuffle. The Harper government is cynically wiping this debt to EI stakeholders off the books – though you won’t see any admission of this anywhere in the budget papers. Instead, Mr. Flaherty merely tells us that the government will provide the new EI with a $2-billion cash reserve and run the plan on a "go-forward basis."</span></p>
<p><span>Now that’s a sweet deal for the finance minister. He’s redeeming the federal government’s $54-billion IOU to EI at four cents cash on the dollar.</span></p>
<p> </p><br><a href="/article/235929636-ei-overhaul-underhanded">read more >></a>

   



C.M. Burns @ Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:05 pm

I can hear it now.
EI is running out of money, the government will have to cut back payments.

Ultimately, this helps to keep wages low, just the way the bosses like it!

   



Dr Caleb @ Sat Mar 08, 2008 1:15 pm

I always knew it was a tax. You can't ever get out of it what you put in, now you never will be able to.

They should just remove the word 'insurance' from 'Employment Insurance', and drop the pretence.

   



sasquatch2 @ Sat Mar 08, 2008 1:36 pm

Yep! The EI surplus has been raided ritually by ever stripe of government for years and then they have the gall to raise "premiums". It is a payroll tax that is in reality a "hidden income tax" on the worker.

   



Rural @ Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:03 pm

I became self employed in part because of this rip off, then you get out exactly what you put in.....nothing. Its the Governments two faced spin on this that gets me realy pissed off!

   



Reverend Blair @ Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:39 pm

Well, to be fair, Rural, they do suggest that you can continue to contribute premiums if you want, even though you won't qualify for benefits. I had a good laugh the day I read that, but there it was, right in the government pamphlet.

   



Ed Deak @ Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:30 pm

Can anybody read the websites? All I get is "Page can not be found" on all stories.

Ed Deak.

   



Dr Caleb @ Sun Mar 09, 2008 12:04 am

Ed Deak Ed Deak:
Can anybody read the websites? All I get is "Page can not be found" on all stories.

Ed Deak.


I fixed this one Ed. Sorry for that. Sometimes one slips by me.

   



Ed Deak @ Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:06 am

Sorry Dr.C. but virtually none of the quited sites work. Just tried them.

Cheers, Ed.

   



a1frenchy @ Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:08 pm

Let's not forget the $50 billion Paul Martin stole, so that makes $104 billion they owe the workers of Canada

   



Dr Caleb @ Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:31 pm

$1:
Sorry Dr.C. but virtually none of the quited sites work. Just tried them.

Cheers, Ed.


That is odd.

Here are direct links to the story. They seem to work.

http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/2359 ... nderhanded

http://thechronicleherald.ca/Editorials/1042305.html

   



REPLY