<strong>Written By:</strong> jensonj
<strong>Date:</strong> 2007-08-30 11:20:04
<a href="/article/7171492-us-unions-and-boycotting-israel">Article Link</a>

The US statement begins by endorsing a sentiment that is repeated adnauseum by pro-Israel activists:

“with the diverse range of oppressive regimes around the world about which there is almost universal silence, we have to question the motives of these resolutions that single out one country in one conflict.”

The first thing to note about this argument is that it contains a remarkable omission. Nowhere in the entire US statement is there mention of the fact that the global campaign of BDS against Israel is a direct response to an urgent appeal signed in July 2005 by over 170 Palestinian worker, student, farmer, women, professional and refugee associations (2). This appeal was endorsed by every Palestinian trade union federation and is the broadest and most representative call for international solidarity ever made by Palestinian society.

This point bears repeating. To portray the call for boycott as a “simplistic and non-constructive approach” originating from outside the region deliberately obfuscates the central point of the BDS campaign. The global trade union support for boycott resolutions is a direct response to an urgent appeal from Palestinian workers and their representatives. Palestinian workers and their representatives have set up a picket line and asked us not to cross. As North American trade unionists we have an extra responsibility to workers and their families struggling against unjust and oppressive regimes – particularly when those regimes are fully supported by the US and Canadian governments.

<a href="http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=13648">http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=13648</a>§ionID=107

   

Why not, our side imposed it on the duly elected government in Palestine, right?

It also sends a positive image to Muslims that white men in blue collars does not mean red-neck anti-muslim, and that we sypathise with them on many levels.

If governments try to control us with the dollar, why not vote with it?

Hal,
Ottawa