Hollywood Harvey Weinstein's sex fiend rep no longer secret
Previous 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17 Next
martin14 @ Fri Oct 20, 2017 11:38 am
Thanos Thanos:
77% of them also think Harvey Weinstein is guilty of the same.
only 77% ?
still means 23% think Harv be alright.
But hey, let us know when someone calls the cops on Trump.
In the meantime, 8 investigations for Harvie boy, the new leader.
I doubt charges will come, but you never know.
Harvey Weinstein being investigated for rape after actress says he 'barged into her LA hotel, dragged her to the bathroom and forced her to have sex' in EIGHTH criminal probe launched by police
Harvey Weinstein is being investigated for rape in the state of California the Los Angeles Police Department announced on Thursday
The victim, a 38-year-old Italian model-actress, said that she saw Weinstein at the 8th annual Los Angeles, Italia Film Fest and he later came to her hotel
'He grabbed me by the hair and forced me to do something I did not want to do. He then dragged me to the bathroom and forcibly raped me,' claims the woman
She said at one point she showed Weinstein photos of her children in hopes that it would stop the assault but it did not work
'I can't respond to some anonymous complaint,' said Weinstein's rep Sallie Hofmeister
This women is now the sixth to accuse Weinstein of rape, joining Rose McGowan, Asia Argento, Lysette Anthony, Lucia Evans and an unnamed woman
Eight criminal probes have now been launched into allegations of sexual assault with two in New York and five in London as well as this latest one in Los Angeles
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4w4hcChKF
Thanos @ Fri Oct 20, 2017 11:38 am
Bump.
Thanos Thanos:
For what it's worth, in a recent poll of confirmed Clinton voters, 83% think that Trump is guilty of sexual harassment. 77% of them also think Harvey Weinstein is guilty of the same. So much for the grand conspiracy of libtards thinking it's OK when one of their own behaves in the same shitty way. What's the same value for Trump fans, about 95% of them thinking their hero either didn't do it or that it's OK that he did it because he's an agent of the Lord to stop the feminazis? Yeah, nice company you're keeping, Fiddy. 
https://twitter.com/aedwardslevy/status ... 8798733312
https://twitter.com/aedwardslevy/status ... 8798733312
N_Fiddledog @ Fri Oct 20, 2017 11:47 am
Personally, I think your Huffington Post poll is designed to accentuate a kind of this-week bias to create a misrepresentation of the facts when considered against a more holistic and proper context.
Sunnyways @ Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:50 am
Weinstein's crimes were never exactly a secret; they lived in a grey zone of rumour, jokes and non-disclosure agreements. The difference now is that they have been confirmed.
N_Fiddledog @ Sat Oct 21, 2017 12:33 pm
$1:
Feminism’s Experiment Against Common Sense
In the wake of the Weinstein scandal, the commissars of feminism are policing ideological infractions with increased vigor. Several women in the entertainment industry have had to apologize abjectly to the commissars for daring to suggest that women seek protection from a salacious, pawing Hollywood culture by not participating in it.
“Big Bang Theory’s Mayim Bialik Publishes Irresponsible Essay On Sexism In Hollywood,” ran a headline in Newsweek, capturing this atmosphere. Bialik had merely allowed herself a brief aside in the New York Times reflecting on the prudence of modesty in an industry of creeps:
I dress modestly. I don’t act flirtatiously with men as a policy. I am entirely aware that these type of choices might feel oppressive to many young feminists. Women should be able to wear whatever they want. They should be able to flirt however they want with whomever they want. Why are we the ones who have to police our behavior?
In a perfect world, women should be free to act however they want. But our world isn’t perfect. Nothing — absolutely nothing — excuses men for assaulting or abusing women. But we can’t be naïve about the culture we live in.
The commissars decreed this an impermissible thought (in spite of its dubious caveats deferential to feminism) and demanded that Bialik prostrate herself before them, which she has duly done in a teary confession note: “I am truly sorry for causing so much pain, and I hope you can all forgive me.”
Fashion designer Donna Karan is also promising to re-educate herself after she asked: “How do we display ourselves, how do we present ourselves as women, what are we asking? Are we asking for it, you know, by presenting all the sensuality and all the sexuality?” Karan blamed her remark on a lack of “sleep” and is prepared to submit to whatever abasements the feminists have in mind in order to erase her “horrible mistake.”
In these pitiful purges, one sees the intensity of feminism’s rejection of common sense, all in the service of a fantasy that ends up hurting women and empowering boors. The Harvey Weinstein scandal didn’t happen in spite of feminism in Hollywood but in part because of it, insofar as feminism encouraged women to plunge into a culture of immodesty without warning them of its costs and dangers.
Indeed, according to the logic of feminism, which holds that all female choices are good ones (provided they deviate from traditional paths), the women who submitted to Weinstein are as honorable as the actresses who resisted him. Feminism, if anything, encouraged a culture of mutual exploitation in which men and women proved their equality by making identically immoral choices.
As all of the protections of women — chivalry, modesty, traditional morality, religion, and so on — dissolved over the years, the feminists cheered. They marked progress in society not by the presence of protections but by their absence. For decades, feminists clamored for the exposure of women to the horrors of war. They thought it a great advance that men no longer hesitated on the battlefield before the prospect of women taken captive and that women would one day serve on the front lines. Women don’t need special protections, they insisted.
Yet the rhetoric heard in recent days belies this insistence. Feminists, while still denying biological difference, assert that women face special dangers in Hollywood and deserved closer protection. At the same time, they don’t want the old protections restored. And so they look elsewhere for protection, to “systemic change,” whatever that means. They, of course, exclude themselves from this “industry-wide” failure to protect women and continue to dole out bad advice to them while castigating anyone who offers sensible counsel.
In the end, feminism will always prioritize ideology over the protection of women. Just look at its loud support for “all genders bathrooms,” the kind that now exist in in the tony New York City hotels Weinstein patronizes. Woe to anyone who brings up the risks of that arrangement for women.
And for all of its talk about the “objectification of women,” it refuses to break with women who define themselves according to it. Feminists defend and celebrate women who turn themselves into sexual objects, then forbid men from treating them as ones. Feminism calls for men to “control themselves,” but reserves the right to maintain an outrageously immodest culture — and to send out its commissars to crush anyone who notices the contradiction.
In the wake of the Weinstein scandal, the commissars of feminism are policing ideological infractions with increased vigor. Several women in the entertainment industry have had to apologize abjectly to the commissars for daring to suggest that women seek protection from a salacious, pawing Hollywood culture by not participating in it.
“Big Bang Theory’s Mayim Bialik Publishes Irresponsible Essay On Sexism In Hollywood,” ran a headline in Newsweek, capturing this atmosphere. Bialik had merely allowed herself a brief aside in the New York Times reflecting on the prudence of modesty in an industry of creeps:
I dress modestly. I don’t act flirtatiously with men as a policy. I am entirely aware that these type of choices might feel oppressive to many young feminists. Women should be able to wear whatever they want. They should be able to flirt however they want with whomever they want. Why are we the ones who have to police our behavior?
In a perfect world, women should be free to act however they want. But our world isn’t perfect. Nothing — absolutely nothing — excuses men for assaulting or abusing women. But we can’t be naïve about the culture we live in.
The commissars decreed this an impermissible thought (in spite of its dubious caveats deferential to feminism) and demanded that Bialik prostrate herself before them, which she has duly done in a teary confession note: “I am truly sorry for causing so much pain, and I hope you can all forgive me.”
Fashion designer Donna Karan is also promising to re-educate herself after she asked: “How do we display ourselves, how do we present ourselves as women, what are we asking? Are we asking for it, you know, by presenting all the sensuality and all the sexuality?” Karan blamed her remark on a lack of “sleep” and is prepared to submit to whatever abasements the feminists have in mind in order to erase her “horrible mistake.”
In these pitiful purges, one sees the intensity of feminism’s rejection of common sense, all in the service of a fantasy that ends up hurting women and empowering boors. The Harvey Weinstein scandal didn’t happen in spite of feminism in Hollywood but in part because of it, insofar as feminism encouraged women to plunge into a culture of immodesty without warning them of its costs and dangers.
Indeed, according to the logic of feminism, which holds that all female choices are good ones (provided they deviate from traditional paths), the women who submitted to Weinstein are as honorable as the actresses who resisted him. Feminism, if anything, encouraged a culture of mutual exploitation in which men and women proved their equality by making identically immoral choices.
As all of the protections of women — chivalry, modesty, traditional morality, religion, and so on — dissolved over the years, the feminists cheered. They marked progress in society not by the presence of protections but by their absence. For decades, feminists clamored for the exposure of women to the horrors of war. They thought it a great advance that men no longer hesitated on the battlefield before the prospect of women taken captive and that women would one day serve on the front lines. Women don’t need special protections, they insisted.
Yet the rhetoric heard in recent days belies this insistence. Feminists, while still denying biological difference, assert that women face special dangers in Hollywood and deserved closer protection. At the same time, they don’t want the old protections restored. And so they look elsewhere for protection, to “systemic change,” whatever that means. They, of course, exclude themselves from this “industry-wide” failure to protect women and continue to dole out bad advice to them while castigating anyone who offers sensible counsel.
In the end, feminism will always prioritize ideology over the protection of women. Just look at its loud support for “all genders bathrooms,” the kind that now exist in in the tony New York City hotels Weinstein patronizes. Woe to anyone who brings up the risks of that arrangement for women.
And for all of its talk about the “objectification of women,” it refuses to break with women who define themselves according to it. Feminists defend and celebrate women who turn themselves into sexual objects, then forbid men from treating them as ones. Feminism calls for men to “control themselves,” but reserves the right to maintain an outrageously immodest culture — and to send out its commissars to crush anyone who notices the contradiction.
https://spectator.org/feminisms-experim ... mon-sense/
martin14 @ Sat Oct 21, 2017 11:15 pm
Belligerent Harvey Weinstein is 'falling asleep during group therapy sessions, ranting about the ''conspiracy against him'' and flat-out denying he is rapist' as he begins his sex-addiction rehab
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4wDOHjVqj
Sunnyways @ Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:57 pm
Weinsteingate will soon enter a new phase of J'accuse from the ladies where things will get a whole lot murkier. Expect a Harvey-sized bolus of allegations, true and false, to land on male celebs via social media over the next few months. Scores will be settled.
Thanos @ Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:59 pm
Meh. Couldn't happen to a more deserving group of scum.
Sunnyways @ Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:03 pm
martin14 martin14:
Belligerent Harvey Weinstein is 'falling asleep during group therapy sessions, ranting about the ''conspiracy against him'' and flat-out denying he is rapist' as he begins his sex-addiction rehab
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4wDOHjVqj
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4wDOHjVqj
I know the subject doesn't deserve a lot of sympathy but...where is the line on confidentiality here?
Thanos @ Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:07 pm
Probably the other rehab inmates telling the dirt media what's going on in exchange for cash.
Sunnyways @ Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:28 pm
Thanos Thanos:
Probably the other rehab inmates telling the dirt media what's going on in exchange for cash.
I presume that's what is happening. It's a bit surprising that he would, well, expose himself to such risk by attending group sessions. Any staff involved in talking to media would be breaking the law.
martin14 @ Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:15 am
New Harvey Weinstein accuser says he made her kiss other women until she fended him off with a broken WINE GLASS as it emerges he 'created Project Runway to gain access to models'
Juliana De Paula says Weinstein invited her and three other models to his NY loft
But on the way up to his room he 'pushed their heads together to make them kiss'
And he groped their breasts before getting naked in the 2007 incident, she said
She said she hid in the bathroom as Weinstein guided the others to his bedroom
Then she heard one repeatedly shouting 'Stop!' but couldn't see what happened
When she fled, she said, a naked Weinstein followed her into the kitchen
After the threatened him with a broken glass, she said, he laughed and let her go
Weinstein also reportedly used his fashion show Project Runway to bait models
He also invested in fashion in order to get closer to models, some said
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4wPKQSWil
martin14 @ Wed Oct 25, 2017 11:12 pm
Harvey Weinstein 'raped me after the BAFTAs': Actress tearfully tells how 'sex abuser' producer burst into her London hotel room and forced himself on her after attending the awards with his wife
Natassia Malthe claims that she was raped by Harvey Weinstein in 2008 at the Sanderson Hotel in London following the BAFTA Awards
She said at a press conference on Wednesday that the movie mogul burst into her room and began masturbating on her bed
He then allegedly forced himself on the 98lbs actress and began having intercourse without a condom despite her pleas to stop
Weinstein attended the BAFTAs that year with his wife of two months, Georgina Chapman
The next day she received a script for 'Nine' and believed she had a role in the film after her audition, so began training for dance and voice lessons
She dropped out of the movie however after Weinstein began getting oral sex from an assistant during a meeting and asked her to join them in a threesome
Malthe is now the ninth person to accuse Weinstein of rape
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4walXJZRs
BRAH @ Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:41 pm
Hurricane Harvey has turned the attention to pedophilia in Hollywood and the first on the chopping block is Kevin Spacey. ![[popcorn]](./images/smilies/popcorn.gif "Eating Popcorn")
martin14 @ Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:45 am
'I'm a martyr': Disgraced Harvey Weinstein believes he is a savior who was born to 'change the world' by taking the fall for sexual assaults
More than 80 women have come forward to accused Harvey Weinstein of assault
Disgraced movie producer believes he was born to take the fall, it is reported
He allegedly said his purpose is to become a 'martyr' and 'change the world'
But a spokesman for the Miramax founder dismissed the claims as 'absurd'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4x5LvMcI7
Weiner gonna save us all !
He is such a good Democrat.
Previous 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17 Next