Previous  1  2  3  4

This benny hill guy is the funniest guy on this site. The fact that he is a raving loon and will hopefully never see the light of day is a good thing.

I'd love to see that happen!

   

this guy is so out of touch with reality its mind boggling. I have never met someone who advocates Child Porn, I'm at a loss for words.

you answer your own question, 17 and a half years is not 18 and therefore still Child Pornography, please do your self a favor, don't type shit on a subject you know fuck all about.

   

Every law should criminalize something which HARMS someone or something. What harm is being done and to whom when two teenagers are filming themselves? Now who is stupid here?

In Canadian criminal code, there are a number of laws which criminilize things where there is no victim or victim is the accused himself. As example of such laws, one could give a crime of say sexual intercourse between a brother and a sister. Why should this be anyone's business? Who is harmed there?

In Soviet Union, sex between two men was a crime. In U.S., in some states, it still is a crime. Is this stupid or what?

Once again, you cannot criminalize action which has no victims, just because you do not like it.

   

Try to use your brain or whatever you have as a substitution. Why would I go and kill innocent people (by innocent I mean people who did me no harm) in full view of everybody else? Do you think my dream was to end up in jail for the rest of my life? Does this make any sense?

Stop using general phrases, read my account and talk facts.

   

Do you honestly believe the shit you type? I love firing guns, but if I was to fire any of my weapons in the city without hurting anyone (no one hurt using your insanely twisted logic) I would be arrested and end up a criminal.

You really are a few sandwiches short of a picnic aren't you.

   

Name me one instance where a 17 year old couple was jailed for making a video. Hell, show me where said couple was even fined. For every hypothetical you have listed there are millions of other cases where children have been abused or coerced into a sex act, to have it filmed or photographed. Those are the people who the laws protect. The same way our laws on murder are protecting society from you, .


You cant be serious? Lets put aside what would happen when these two have kids. When two siblings engage in a sexual relationship there are deeper psychological issues at the heart of the problem. To ignore that fact and say it is ok is a miscarriage of the social responsibility of our society.

   

Maybe thats benny hill's problem.

   

Not interested in anything you have to say. You're an unrepentant mass murderer looking for any means to justify your hideous actions. If it were up to me I'd ban you from here in a heartbeat.

I'm done. My point is made.

   

If you are discharging in such a situation in where you cannot possibly harm anyone, you are not committing any crime and if there is law saying otherwise, it should be scrapped. If you are out in the street and shooting around, you can certainly kill somebody and this is a crime, because you endanger lives.



Here is example: suppose this couple wants to sell their film, another person buys it and according to the law, he is a criminal. Who did he harm? I am in jail and do not have statistics, but the way the law is written is stupid. The law of protection should be very simple: procedure in which the child was abused is a crime. Otherwise, it is not, no matter how disgusting the thing might look. Every crime should have a victim and victim should be not the perpetrator.



What the hell those pompous words mean? You want to be big brother to those people who do no harm to you or to anybody else? No matter how disgusting it looks to you (or to government or to society), it is none of their business. Our jails are already full. Why do you need to put harmless people in jail? In the past, the same exact argument was used against homosexuality, it was society's responsibility to stop it. Am I getting through to you?

About what would happen when they have kids, nothing will happen. Their father and mother will be also brother and sister. It is no more disgusting when a child has two fathers or two mothers. But most of all, it is none of society's business.

   

You lost that argument when you said suppose, you can ponder all you want, but if no couple under the age of 17 has gotten in trouble for selling a sex tape you have no argument. If a couple makes a sex tape it is a private thing, I doubt they would want to sell it on the open market.




So your saying homosexuals are like brothers and sisters who practice incest?
Incestuous relationships do harm other people, they damage the family and the offspring are at very high risk to carry genetic disorders (see the Tsars of Russia at the turn of the century). All incestuous relationships have deep psychological issues; most likely another family member abused the child or children. Canadian society cares about its members, which is why we have laws against sexual abuse; if you feel you want to make love to your sibling you are free to leave the country. Shit sorry you have a criminal record and you’re in jail, guess you should have thought about that before you murdered people. I think there are several 3rd world nations that approve of such a thing however.
You are not going to gain ground by comparing this to homosexuality. Homosexuality is not abusive, it is the exact opposite, and a person does not become gay due to abuse or mental disorders. For you to even compare that to incest just shows you know little about what you are saying.

   

Please tell that this isnt really this clown?

   

he alleges he is, I wouldn't try reasoning with Comrade Fabrikant - its like bashing your head against a brick wall. I just wish we could find some Gulag to ship our good comrade.

   

There are two things. I doubt that you can question every couple in Canada whether they did or did not get into any trouble. So, don't claim something you do not know. We are talking about the way the law is written, period. It is stupid and it should be scrapped. In addition, since they are minors, this cannot be made public. As far as selling their film is concerned, go to the internet, there are millions of them, all for sale.



Are you saying that homosexual doesn't damage the family? Do you think a lot of parents would be proud to hear that their son or daughter is a homosexual? How many parents never speak to their children because of it? This is a stupid example; contemporary technology allows to screen defective children at a very early stage and diffective children are not prerogutive of brothers and sisters. It may come to any couple.



So, what's the solution? Put them in jail? You don't make sense, if they are having sex because of abuse from a family member, why are they getting punished with jail? They're the VICTIMS.

And what proof do you have that is because of abuse? That may be in some cases, but not all. It could just be because the brother and sister are attracted to each, that's all. Why should the siblings who didn't get abused have to suffer for the ones that did?



That's got to be the dumbest I've ever read. Canadians are so compassionate that they will put those people in JAIL with murderers and rapist! How caring! Do you really think the law is going to prevent a brother and sister from having sex? If they want to have sex, they'll just do it and not tell anybody, the same homosexuals used to do it when it was illegal. How about you live your life and let them live there's?



Here we go again with the word "abuse". I suggest you look that word in the dictionary. Abusive means being treated badly. In this case, both brother and sister WANT it. So, how is it abusive to the brother and sister? The only person abusing them is YOU and the Government.

And how do you know the person didn't become gay because of abuse (by relatives/friends)?

Let me repeat once again, ALL of what you're saying against incest was used against homosexuality.

   

What the hell does Benny Patrick think happened in the final days of the Weimar Republic? That Hitler drove up in his car a la Sylvester McMonkey McBean and just started transforming the country?

Canada isn't ripe for another Hitler because Canada isn't facing the same economic/social/military hell-hole that Germany was in. Everything was hyper-inflated, pride was trampled underfoot and social conditions were the shit.

Instead, you're prattling about how a Canadian Hitler could appear in a vaccuum and rape us all with S. 33 of the Charter. Did your mother drop you as a baby?

   

Previous  1  2  3  4