Trudeau calls long-gun registry 'a failure'
jj2424 @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 2:24 pm
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2 ... istry.html
This should be interesting conversation in Quebec.
Bodah @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:38 pm
Yeah that won't fly in Quebec.
DanSC @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:42 pm
Trudeau must be counting on Quebec seceding before the next election.
Freakinoldguy @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:59 pm
Good for him, no time like the present to start alienating every province in the country. ![[B-o]](./images/smilies/drinkup.gif "Drink up")
I wonder when he's gonna make some idiotic comment about the Maritimes since it's the only area left he hasn't insulted.
Public_Domain @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:03 pm
martin14 @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:03 pm
$1:
in a final vote of 159-130. Trudeau voted against the abolition of the federal long-gun registry.
flippa -- floppa.
ShepherdsDog @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:06 pm
He's been Romneyfied, going from NDP lite Justin to Justice Justin
Gunnair @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:11 pm
I think I might like him. He ain't flip flopping more than any other politician and he ain't shy about stepping in it a bit. I rather like a bit of colour unlike many of the fifty shades of grey many of our politicians strive for.
I'll take a Justin over a Kenny just like I'd take Baird over some of the other boring pillars of beige that sleep through question period.
Public_Domain @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:14 pm
Gunnair @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:18 pm
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
I don't seem him as anything other than a politician....
...Don't worry guys, I'll never vote for him.
Will you ever vote for a politician or will you not bother to vote but then claim to stand on your principals?
Public_Domain @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:23 pm
Gunnair @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:39 pm
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Who the hell would I vote for that would still allow me to be "Standing by my principles"?
I'm sure I've mentioned this a couple times in the past but I refuse to even vote for the Communist Party. Or the other Communist Party (M-L).
Think of it like this: Maybe I'm voting for anarchy.
I tell you what... It would have to be one highly interesting and compelling politician to beg my vote.
I'd probably have to know him personally, and be very aware of his intentions, or even involved, before I could consider voting for him. Or her.
I consider my vote extremely valuable, oddly, and so I respectfully refuse to just toss it away to any of the current degenerates I see on the ballots, or any I see for the foreseeable future.
I'm sure I've mentioned this a couple times in the past but I refuse to even vote for the Communist Party. Or the other Communist Party (M-L).
Think of it like this: Maybe I'm voting for anarchy.
I tell you what... It would have to be one highly interesting and compelling politician to beg my vote.
I'd probably have to know him personally, and be very aware of his intentions, or even involved, before I could consider voting for him. Or her.
I consider my vote extremely valuable, oddly, and so I respectfully refuse to just toss it away to any of the current degenerates I see on the ballots, or any I see for the foreseeable future.
Misers think gold is valuable too so they don't spend it. How does that benefit them or anyone else in the end, hmmmm?
Public_Domain @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:39 pm
Gunnair @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:41 pm
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
It doesn't, but neither does voting for terrible politicians,
Well not voting to affect change is tantamount to sitting on the couch to lose weight.
Good luck, I say!
Public_Domain @ Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:47 pm