With the aging of the boomers and the advancement of health care and age expentencies, isn't the issue of euthanasia relevant to Canadians now? I have a history of painful diseases in my family and after yet another funeral my parents seperately made their wishes known to me. They're in their mid-50s, so it shouldn't come to that for a while, or not at all hopefully.
But once I starting thinking about it, I got all philosophical and stuff and wondered about ownership of one's life. I think its offensive to have a government have any say in the matter. Its almost like reverse execution, isn't it? I wonder why in societies that pretend to be more individualistic it is more of a taboo than in more communal ones.
I'm curious about the mood in this country on the subject, and how important it is to others. It seems to always be swept under the rug everytime its brought up here. But I've seen it ruin some extended family of mine.
I think someone has the right to die if they want to. There should be laws put forth where you need to have written consent several months before you do it, and perhaps a basic phycological analysis.
I know if I was dieing of a serious disease, I wouldn't want to rot away in a hospital. I"d like to have one last night with my family and friends, then go in a peaceful way.
I also think that each person should be able to die on their own terms rather than suffer for months or years with some disease.
until some idiot office clerk in Ottawa rubber stamps my death approval.
Euthanasia is when someone else decides it's your time. Which I oppose.
But if you wish to kill yourself, to me that is your business. Have at it if you wish.
I've heard of various practices that could be called 'Euthanasia' or assisted suicide.
1. Doctors prescribing a lethal medication for a quick, painless death--which should be completely legal. The doctor should keep it well documented and have signatures and a witness so he doesn't get accidentally accused of murder.
2. People who are in such terrible condition that they can't administer the suicide themselves get a doctor to help them (a la Kevorkian). If someone is in such horrible shape they can't even kill themselves, let them die. However, again the doctor should have witnesses present to protect his ass.
3. Terri Shiavo style, comatose/brain dead etc. Can't even ask to be killed, very little to no chance of recovery. It should be the family’s decision to pull the plug.
A person should be able to write a living will which outlays the circumstances in which they wish to have it end, and be able to appoint an executor of it in order to make sure that his or her wishes are fulfilled
Again, I'm okay with this so long as it is the person's clear choice to do so. The Terri Schiavo thing was just murder. Her will was never clearly demonstrated and the Judge took it upon himself to starve her to death - which is not euthanasia but just plain cruelty. The son of a bitch would go to jail if he did this to a dog in the same condition but gets away with it because Terri happened to be a human being.
It should be pointed out that another person who was in a "persistent vegetative state" recently came out of it after over twenty years.
A person with Alzheimer's does not have a clear choice.
With many people living longer, healthier lifestyles they are experiencing deteriorating brains before the rest of their bodies deteriorate. People are now living for years in nursing homes with no memory of what they were doing 5 minutes ago.
How will we be able to afford to care for these people that don't have the wealth to pay for their own care?
As people move through the stages of Alzheimer's they need more and more care and eventually become empty husks.
Who would enjoy watching their loved ones live on for years without recognition of living any sort of life?
I think society will have some hard choices to make in the near future on what to do about our aged loved ones who no longer recognize the life they are living.
Those in advanced stages of Alzheimer's have lost their chance to die with dignity.I find it cruel that people are being forced, by reason of compassion, to live on with absolutley no dignity left in their lives.
At a minimum, people should be able to stipulate in a living will that their life should come to a dignified and compassionate end if reaching a certain stage of Alzheimer's or other deteriorating or debilitating disease if they have led a full life.
Meet a person's basic needs for survival, food and water. Or we could just go with the way of nature, if you can't survive on your own, you probably shouldn't.