Canada Kicks Ass
Canada Officially withdraws from Kyoto

REPLY

1  2  Next



Caelon @ Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:32 pm

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2 ... llout.html

While it has been anticipated for quite awhile Canada has now withdrawn from Kyoto.

$1:
The decision to do so will save the government an estimated $14 billion in penalties, Kent said. The Conservative government says it has no choice given the economic situation.

In Canada's statement regarding the pullout it was pointed out that Kyoto only covers 30% of the emitters while the agreement in Cancun covers 75% and therefore is more deserving of Canada's support.

   



eureka @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:52 am

But Canada's statement is not true. Kyoto covers every nation on Earth. It simply divided them into tiers according to when action would be mandatory. The renewal of Kyoto would have seen what Canada pretends to wants but does not want since it would require Harper to drop his religiously fervent denial of Global Warming. He would have to tell that adviser from the Family Values Coalition that he had seen the light. He would have to tell the oil industry that he could no longer be bought.

   



peck420 @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:00 am

Eureka,

You may want to let the US know that.

They have not ratified. Kyoto has zero legal bearing over them.

   



eureka @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:25 am

The US agreed to Kyoto. It was not ratified because Clinton knew it would be defeated by the Republican majority. The US has not yet considered ratification but it is a signatory to the Accord and had not withdrawn.

Canada is alone in this. It has been described by other members as a pariah. IT made clear before the conference that its object was to sink any chance of agreement. Conservative Parliamentarians in Parliament cheered when they heard the news that Canada had received another "fossil of the day" award.

Canada is entirely alone in the world over this. It is nothing to cheer about but a cause for shame for every Canadian. Even those with Royal Blue skins.

   



Bruce_the_vii @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:34 am

Why don't they just implement a green tax and cut some other general tax the same amount. This would encourage conservation and show we are doing something. Each year you could get a little more aggressive to get people on the energy saving path. It would stop the argument.

   



PublicAnimalNo9 @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:40 am

eureka eureka:
The US agreed to Kyoto. It was not ratified because Clinton knew it would be defeated by the Republican majority. The US has not yet considered ratification but it is a signatory to the Accord and had not withdrawn.

Canada is alone in this. It has been described by other members as a pariah. IT made clear before the conference that its object was to sink any chance of agreement. Conservative Parliamentarians in Parliament cheered when they heard the news that Canada had received another "fossil of the day" award.

Canada is entirely alone in the world over this. It is nothing to cheer about but a cause for shame for every Canadian. Even those with Royal Blue skins.

Yer right(or is it left? :lol:) It's much better to have a PM sign on the dotted line and then just ignore the fact he signed it. Maybe even increase the exploration and development of the oil sands while he's at it.

Nah, nobody could be that stupid.

   



peck420 @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:41 am

Wow.

By not ratifying the treaty, the US has not agreed to be legally bound by any of the terms.

They don't need to pull out, they never entered.

   



andyt @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:44 am

Bruce_the_vii Bruce_the_vii:
Why don't they just implement a green tax and cut some other general tax the same amount. This would encourage conservation and show we are doing something. Each year you could get a little more aggressive to get people on the energy saving path. It would stop the argument.


I agree Bruce. A tax on carbon has all sorts of benefits besides GHG reduction. We started down that road in BC, but the current govt has lot it's enthusiasm for it, even tho it is desperate for money. And it had some stupid features, like carbon we export wasn't subject to the tax. Canada going to a carbon tax won't solve AGW, but as you say, we'd at least be doing something, bringing in a revenue stream and reducing pollution of all kinds.

   



andyt @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:44 am

peck420 peck420:
Wow.

By not ratifying the treaty, the US has not agreed to be legally bound by any of the terms.

They don't need to pull out, they never entered.


Just dry humping huh?

   



peck420 @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:56 am

[BF] ROTFL ROTFL ROTFL

   



eureka @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:38 am

Ratified or not it still obligated the US to certain actions in compliance. But I am not going into that. I have no interest in argument about who ratified and what they are obliged to do. It is unparalleled evil when the consequences are well known to this government.

And they are known and catastrophic climate change will be unavoidable. The scientific consensus is that there are just a few years left in which to begin effective measures to stop the increase of CO2 emissions in order to restrict temperature increase to that 2C which may (or may not) be something that humanity in relation to the Planet can cope with. That, btw, is the optimistic view and there are many scientists who think that coping at that level will not be possible.

It is you and your descendants who will feel them not just those in distant lands who can be ignored.

The rest of the world is telling you that. Are Canadians so saturated in the propaganda of the CPC and the American Republicans that they have lost the ability to think - and see?

   



DanSC @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:40 am

eureka eureka:
Ratified or not it still obligated the US to certain actions in compliance.

How, exactly? I'm curious about how this works for any unratified treaty, not just this one.

   



eureka @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:12 pm

To start, Dan, the US committed at Bali to setting targets comparable to the other Annex 1 countries. That means a de facto acceptance of Kyoto. The US, btw, is actually making some headway finally; if not enough. Canada is doing nothing, federally.

But, as I have said, I am not remotely interested in getting into legal quibbles about this.

Can you think of any instance in history where one country has defied the totality of the rest of the world as Canada is now doing? Canada has sabotaged Man's hope.

That is not hyperbolic. The stakes are that high and it will be too late by the time some future agreement can be made.

   



OnTheIce @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:16 pm

eureka eureka:

Can you think of any instance in history where one country has defied the totality of the rest of the world as Canada is now doing? Canada has sabotaged Man's hope.




THE WORLD IS ENDING! CANADA HAS RUINED MAN KIND!

Image

   



saturn_656 @ Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:18 pm

   



REPLY

1  2  Next