1  2  Next

I just came across this website and I was wondering the thoughts of this.

Draft Gore

Personally, while I think he's done a good job raising environmental awareness, I think he would do more harm than good. He's not an effective leader given America's current climate.

   

Tis an ill wind that does nobody any good.

Yes Gore has inspired a lot of environmental awareness....maybe...maybe not....

Being a ring-leader in a clumsy attempt to attain Global power and destroy western society is not commendable.

Nor is orchestrating a campaign which has wickedly wasted $50,000,000,000 on research to prove the unprovable....resources if spent on malaria control, clean water, clean air would advance humanity's welfare. He will go down in history not as a STalin, Hitler, mao, Pol Pot but at least a Mussulini figure....perhaps as little as "Lord HAW HAW." At least the last two were hung by their contemporaries.

   

I don't think Gore has planned for this, and I hope he realizes that he is simply a lobbyist now, and I think that's all he can be. That's where he'll be most effective. While an environmental shift is needed, his rise to fame is on the fear factor he has created around global warming, and I'm not convinced he has a solution to it or a solution to manage the environmental shift.

But then again, if he goes he throws an interesting hat into the presidential debate. It could be fun and beneficial.

The scariest part of that web site is the main page that calls him "The Conscience of the Democratic Party".

   

Typical...insert your own "HEE HAW HAW" and you'd have a better post. But, hey, suggesting that Gore is analogous to Mussolini is easily on par with your super secret Avro Arrow tinfoil hat dreck, so another classic samsquirt fumble emerges! Yeah!

   

And Samsquanch stinks up another thread with that steaming double coiler.

   

And CKA's candidates for the Lord HAW HAW medal step forward in full quixotic form.

Lord Haw Haw's last hurrah

   

Two cold years, and Gore will be thought of as being as much an environmentalist as he is an inventor of the internet.

But yeah, let him run. We could use a laugh.

   

Besides he already won the presidency once.

   

Zipperfish lacks William Joyce' eloquence. If he won then howcum he is screwing around with a lost cause and not screwing around the American public as a treasonous president and sending military aid to Saddam like Clinton did China/Russia?

Margolis view

   

Why does everything environmental have to do with global warming? It doesn't. If people are that short-sighted, where a two-year cold snap makes people think everything's peachy, then we are doomed. Maybe I have a little more faith than you in the public, which may include you if you deny the environmental disaster starting to occur on this planet.

I think the general public is starting to realize the ability is there to not continue our destructive ways and we should explore that possibility. Whether or not that makes a difference, there is lots of doubt, but it can happen and there is no harm in changing destructive ways.

As I said, he has done a good job at environmental awareness. He has misled a lot of people, but on the other hand so have his opponents, mainly those in big oil and their related think tanks.

I agree that if he runs, it may be a laugh. On the other hand, you might not be laughing if he gets elected, because it'll grassroots democracy at it's best. Until the conservative conspiracy theorists prove he planned it all along!

Muhahahaha

   

I think he'd make a good president but at this point in the race he'd be superfluous. The Democratic field is already full of quality candidates and if were to run all he really would end up being is a single issue candidate.

   

Why would Al Gore give up Millions of Dollars spewing his propaganda to become President?

   

Yeah, i noticed you cowered from defending your uneducated trucker logic that pukes out such intellectual gems like, "He will go down in history not as a STalin, Hitler, mao, Pol Pot but at least a Mussulini figure....perhaps as little as "Lord HAW HAW." At least the last two were hung by their contemporaries."

Sorry, that's still the epitome of dumb and par for the course for samsquirt.

Keep running.

   

passthedutchie

Really provide some proof---other than that you are a useful idiot for the alarmists.

It has been estimated that at best $20,000,000 (mostly non public funds) has been spent on valid research in to climate change while about $50,000,000,000 of public funds has been spent on this campaign of propaganda and junk science.

Now that waste of resources better spent on anything from clean air, clean water, malaria prevention, AIDs research even research of NEO (near-Earth-objects). But then the UN types and Gore/Suzuki/Strong cabel wouldn't have been able to line their pockets.

The Lord HAW HAW anology is certainly accurate----

   

You ask him to provide proof and then you make an absolutely outrageous calim wiht no source whatsoever, you piffling squib? What a lightweight.

   

1  2  Next