1  2  Next

In regards to the post which is locked but visible:

We welcome our brothers and sisters from other countries with "open-arms" though we will begin by asserting that Canadians are better informed than Americans.





It says that you are willing to criticize without tolerating criticism.

While we may not all agree with the political views of many countries, including both the U.S. and Canada, please do not confuse geographic and demographic statistical knowledge with intelligence.



That possibly the educational priorities are different and they may not value a renaissance education like you do because exergenic forces demand knowledge specialization.

Which may explain why the brain drain goes to the US and not the other way around.

So, once again, thank you for coming to visit CanadaKA.net and feel free to post in the forums.

   

maybe thats why that thread is closed huh??? Could you send me the link to it sao I can check it out and possibly delete some shit there.. Thanks

   

RoyalHighlander

It is very hard to miss as it is the first topic(sticky) on the Politics/War Forum.

Warning Topic to Americans.

I don't know if you really want to delete it as it provides much comic relief.

Now is that all Americans or just a few of them because here it states that mnay Canadians know more than Americans do about the United States. That quantifies it as all Americans. Wow! I'm impressed.

We're just that good.

   

LMAO Well buddy its not locked to start with and it was started in Nov 2002.. and there were folks banned because of some of the comments.. Any ways wet blanket.. youve made 5 posts here and all you do is complain... Whats your next target gonna be??????

   

First) This topic is locked you cannot edit posts or make replies

The above message is what I get when attempting to post on that topic. I suggest you register a non-moderator uname and attempt to post something to that topic. Any troubleshooting of the system is up to you after that if indeed it is not locked and at least it has been brought to your attention. Your statements bear no resemblance of relevancy to the fact that it does not allow me to post no matter when the topic was initiated.

Second) What's your point? You can generalize for some "appealing to the gallery".

Please excuse me if I respond to a post without glowing sycophantism. Quite frankly the assertion of this topic is that the author of the other topic wants to criticize without being criticized. A poor public policy statement. Sorry if you cannot get that. THough rather than addressing the criticism as being potentially valid you have defended with a generalized criticism which is quite simply wrong and willfully fallacious.

Unless you can as the author of the orginal post has indicated:



These are the rules are they not.

So at this point you have claimed I have made 5 posts. Now six. And of those five posts all of them have been to complain. Well time to back up your statements with fact rather than "ignorance and hatred".

Post One:

Post One
Please indicate the criticism of this post.

Post Two:

Post Two
Please indicate the criticism of this post.

Now let's see you back up your assertions with proof.

Time to doctor your spin.

   

Relax malcolm we're not here to get into this kind of bullshit

if you don't like something that's going on with this site just PM a mod

i wonder if this useless thread can be closed * hint hint *

   

Who the hell is this guy? Did i miss somthing?

   

AdamNF

Who the hell is this guy? Did i miss somthing?

Please to meet you. Hope you guess my name.

Ronnie

if you don't like something that's going on with this site just PM a mod

Thank you.

Actually it wasn't a life and death struggle. It was orginally meant to be a constructive criticism on an opening policy statement that was self defeating. It simply says: We must respect that each group of citizens are not the politics so don't call us Canadian names because you Americans are stupid and I have proof which you must also provide.(summarized)

But instead of getting a response that was based on the topic at hand of justifying why it was that the forum mangement would want to send that message, I got back a tainted character based reply.

So by the rules of the topic in question I asked the person resorting to character posting to back up the statements he made as required by the topic in question when making such assertions.

I didn't make the rules I was only told to follow them.

It would be interesting to see now if a topic gets deleted for following the rules.

   

first off I didn't say delete this topic I said close it, as in no more replying

anyway, yes you are following the rules but if everyone here linked facts to everything they said this forum would be a mess

now since after being accused that 5 of your 5 posts were about complain, and you only posted about 2 that weren't I'm going to assume that your other 3 were you complaining . So that means RH missed by 2 posts. Who cares! this will happen all the time. His point was only that you seem complain a lot.

I'm not wasting my time looking through your posts to see if you were complaining or not because frankly I don't care.

So with all that said there is no need for you to be getting on the way you were because your just wasting your time by getting into stupid forums arguments that really prove nothing

Like I said before just PM the mod if you have a problem

   

Hello there.. Im the Mod here, can I be of help???

   

Well the other two were reactions to character personality hooks and I simply did not want to bother with mentioning responses against character attacks. That is redundent.

The ony one left after that is this topic header.

RH

Exactly why does the topic I criticized serve the goals of this forum?

   

for my part anyways.

In the future I will show greater courtesy by addressing these issues directly to the moderators by way of Private Messaging.

   

ummmm....to be honest...i started with the same type of attitude but i caught on quickly. some people don't.

so what would happen if someone was required to read the rules of posting after they become a member? that might prevent all these useless threads and bashing posts....
i know that when i joined up i just clicked the last button and then started posting...

what do u think of this RH?

   

I did read the rules for posting.

That was the problem and those rules have been reviewed once it was noted that they were conflicting with the efforts of this forum to be an open an honest endevour.

Exactness is hard to apply to a social enviroment.

Everyone is a critic myself included. Though ultimately we should work for the benefit of the ones we address.

   

it has been a while since i joined, so my memory of the joining process is a little foggy....i just want to make sure my suggestion in the post before wasn't a stupid one b/c it already is like that.....

so could u refresh me?

where and when did u read the rules on posting?

   

1  2  Next