Canada Kicks Ass
I know where Sadam’s WMD are hidden…

REPLY

1  2  3  4  5  Next



human @ Fri Oct 15, 2004 5:46 pm

While the PAY to SAY Media was and still covering-up for both the UN, and Saddam’s regime’s legitimacy; when the oil for food scandal leaked, they come up with their most provocative title yet when they said, “Nothing to See Here!”

Let us analyse this Oil for Food Scandal from the political point of view?

It appears to me before I read about this scandal back in Mars of this year that the only reason behind the UN idiotic resistance to imply its own resolution in Iraq is not the WAR itself, but rather the fear of finding where Saddam’s WMD ended up, and that why I didn’t buy their pretence then when they acted like the Adults of the world who is preventing the American child GWB, who like to play war, from expanding the war on Terror, even if that meant then, a total defeat to the entire human race.

When the scandal came to light, it sounded to me like the elements of corruption are contradicting the element of discovery…

Let’s look at it together here.

At that time of that UN fiasco, if you remember, the leftist and their agents in Media said that “The Legitimacy” is what the USA lacked in Iraq without UN authorization, but 19 month later (October 19 2004) into that war, the left and their media are still talking about America and GWB illegitimate, dirty war, while the rest of us can only question ourselves, why?

While the International left, and as much as the Israeli left can only feel legitimacy when they feed from their political and personal lust for power, despite the fact that their legitimacy aligned itself in parallel with the terrorists’ goals, it seems to me that this scandal should be at least enough for them to pause and reflect.

But they didn’t.

Alas that their hatred for GWB got mixed-up with the Islamists hatred for him, but then they have to use their rosy excuse of their love not to terror since they claim “they don’t”, but rather to the UN as the top representative of global government.

Come to think about this scandal, which Henry Hyde (R-IL), who chaired the Oil for Food Senate hearing last April or May of this year and called it “the Oil for Food debacle and a scandal without precedent in U.N. history”, and at the same time, think about all the UN obstruction of our efforts to disarm Saddam by force. Make you wonder; they were protecting a financial asset, covering up the massive corruption along with where Saddam’s WMD ended up, and therefore protecting the top leaders of that shameful program?

Friends of Saddam-Audits:

http://www.acepilots.com/unscam/archive ... udits.html


According to the Washington post leak source, Kojo Annan, son of Kofi, is a consultant for Cotecna Inspection SA, a Swiss company that won the UN contract to inspect all oil-for-food shipments into Iraq.

France and Russia were America’s most strident obstructers during the UN/Iraq crisis; French and Russian companies received $11 billion worth of business from Oil for Food between 1996 and 2003.

Even more disturbing is the fact that Benon Sevan, the executive director of Oil for Food, received from Saddam Hussein a voucher for 11.5 million barrels of oil, which would yield a profit of between $575,000 and $3.5 million, depending on market conditions.
The list says this…

• Iraqi American businessman Shaker Al-Khaffaji, who put up $400,000 to produce a film by ex-U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter, which aimed to discredit America’s case against Iraq.

• British Labour MP George Galloway, a staunch anti-war advocate, received 19.5 million barrels of Saddam’s oil.

• Leith Shbeilat, chairman of the anti-corruption committee of the Jordanian Parliament, received 15.5 million barrels. (Can you say irony?)

• Former French Interior Minister Charles Pasqua; 12 million barrels.

• Patrick Maugein, oil executive and financial backer of French President Jacques Chirac; 25 million barrels.

• Jean-Bernard Merimee, former French Ambassador to the United Nations; 11 million barrels.

• Indonesian President Megawati Sukarnoputri; 10 million barrels

• Syrian businessman Farras Mustafa Tlass, son of Syrian Defence Minister Mustafa Tlass; 6 million barrels.

Beyond the inserts and the bribes, it looks like 87% of the contracts for delivering the food and medicine the Iraqi people actually did receive were overpriced.

It is really funny how America and GWB were accused with all the bad things, while implying that John Kerry’s vision of progressive internationalism is something serious for America to consider despite the fact that the very picture of UN is a corrupt, poisoned with mass of tyrants, despots, and nations who claim their love to freedom and human rights, yet exploit and prolong the suffering of the innocent Iraqi population in order to fill their pockets, and exactly the same way those leaders conduct themselves when they deal with their nationalists herds of idiots.

However if you still wondering where are Saddam’s WMD?

May I suggest looking under GOOFY ANNAN’s PILLOW…?



Jack the human

   



Robair @ Fri Oct 15, 2004 6:15 pm

human human:
More incredibly, despite those audits, over $10 billion that was meant for the suffering Iraqi people went into the pockets of Saddam’s supporters. During those seven years, the hard left attacked America (not the UN) without relent for the sanctions that killed “a million Iraqi children”.
I believe the figure is 300,000 Iraqi children. The UN voted unanimously to lift the sanctions not long after they were first imposed, because the suffering of the Iraqis became evident. The United States vetoed any easing of sanctions.


human human:
The corruption is so immense and so damning that we should be making an apartment complex out of the UN’s New York headquarters right now.

Good idea, destroy the international communities common ground.

Nobody is going to argue that the UN, like any other governing body, has become corrupt. And nobody will argue against a shake up, a restructuring. I will, however, argue against abolishing it. What's the alternative? The United States??

America is not interested in world peace or ending poverty, budy. America is interested in looking out for number one and it doesn't matter at whos expense.

   



human @ Fri Oct 15, 2004 6:55 pm

Robair Robair:
human human:
More incredibly, despite those audits, over $10 billion that was meant for the suffering Iraqi people went into the pockets of Saddam’s supporters. During those seven years, the hard left attacked America (not the UN) without relent for the sanctions that killed “a million Iraqi children”.


I believe the figure is 300,000 Iraqi children. The UN voted unanimously to lift the sanctions not long after they were first imposed, because the suffering of the Iraqis became evident. The United States vetoed any easing of sanctions.


I believe the USA took the right position----> as for the sanction...

Shouldn't stop...

Because it supposes to punish the GVT in Iraq...

The food for oil program should cover what ever the Iraqi needs...

Immediately...

No cheap Transportation...

Cheap Product...

And Double the Price...





human human:
The corruption is so immense and so damning that we should be making an apartment complex out of the UN’s New York headquarters right now.

Good idea, destroy the international communities common ground.

Nobody is going to argue that the UN, like any other governing body, has become corrupt. And nobody will argue against a shake up, a restructuring. I will, however, argue against abolishing it. What's the alternative? The United States??


Did you hear the word Destroy in my conversation?

He said rebuild another complex


Expand...

Clean out...

Rational for Permenent peace and not only

Using Treaties alone...


America is not interested in world peace or ending poverty, budy. America is interested in looking out for number one and it doesn't matter at whos expense.



America not interested in PEACE?


Which one...

See...

Peace means Reason...

Not bombing...

B-------->heading... B stand for be gone with the head (Both ways)
C-------->heading... Cut Pieces from an alive human... heading
H-------->heading... Honor killing heading
S--------->heading...Stoning heading
E--------->heading... Equality or Gender Valley between God's Children heading
M--------->heading... Mut'A Marriage Heading
BR-------->heading... Birth rate level and that goes to the Pope

Earth's resources are diminishing b the second...

   



Rev_Blair @ Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:27 pm

The ingestion of peyote is not for amateurs, Human.

   



human @ Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:55 am

Rev_Blair Rev_Blair:
The ingestion of peyote is not for amateurs, Human.


What is?

   



Robair @ Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:01 pm

Sooo.... what are the remaining ties between Saudi Arabia and 9-11?

   



human @ Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:32 am

Avro,


My post has nothing to do with your conspiracy theory that alq’uada Islamists cells in Canada are publishing for sure.

You are forgetting one fact that conspiracy theories don’t name people of such magnitude, but rather they depend on imaginary sources.

The senate hearing that took place three month ago will resume right after the inauguration ceremony, and only then you will realize the exact meaning of conspiracy theory.

Coming to a theatre near you.

   



human @ Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:37 am

Robair Robair:
Sooo.... what are the remaining ties between Saudi Arabia and 9-11?



This has to do with different thread.

   



Rev_Blair @ Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:52 am

Just answer the damned question.

   



human @ Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:32 am

Avro Avro:
$1:
My post has nothing to do with your conspiracy theory that alq’uada Islamists cells in Canada are publishing for sure.



Conspiracy? I get it....only yours count. :roll:



Since everything I said is factually proven and what left is to dig the hearing’s investigation as deep as whole thing goes, I say conspiracy is something you know alone. :)

   



human @ Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:43 am

Rev_Blair Rev_Blair:
Just answer the damned question.



You like to play army soldiers and officers don't you?


I hope that you realize the fact that the world doesn't turn around you either... :lol:

   



Rev_Blair @ Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:33 am

You say you have facts, then point to things that have been proven wrong.
You say you have answers, then refuse to give them.
You say you have knowledge, then refuse to share it.

Are you multi-guy?

   



REPLY

1  2  3  4  5  Next