March for freedom of expression, London the 25th of March
DerbyX DerbyX:
A double standard?
Well you can view it any way you want to – but the Jyllands-Posten has done Christian caricatures before – in the present climate they are not running anything due to self censorship! Flemming Juste (chief editor of Jyllands-Posten): They have won – self censorship is a fact!
Another thing/ the Jyllands-Posten is a right wing paper – but not a fare right like some like to put it – and as noted before - making use of your freedom of expression does not mean that you have to take a stand on all sides at the same time.
- you can’t expect an editor not to be bias – as I learned last week in “60 minutes” - who visited Denmark and interviewed: one of the laying imams, a bleeding socialist, a left wing news paper editor and an old grumpy foreign minister – on these “objective” interviews they made their conclusion – I and about 80% other Danes don’t agree with them but it’s their right to put down any editorial line that they want.
DerbyX @ Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:35 pm
Its always fun to read hate-mail from christian people like that. I see it on Atheist sites and evolution sites and its always the same.
$1:
DerbyXI don't see it as such and neither would any single muslim on earth nor anyone with an open mind.
Well you can simply "refuse to see it ass such" if you like. But if you want anyone to respect your opinion you'll have to actually justify
why you "don't see it as such."
You can't just say "no it isn't" and expect that to be taken seriously Derby.
$1:
It is also important to note the truth behind why the muslim reaction over the cartoons has been extreme and you Xtian apologists respond with "we wouldn't do it if our saviour was insulted thusly".
Well, by all means, enlighten us with this "truth" Derby.
$1:
And for the record you guys get massively pissed off. The violent BS has been coming from areas where they experience violence everyday and its indemic.
Oh. What a revelation! Islamic countries experience violence everyday.
Maybe if they could get their shit together and stop living in the 11th century, then their streets would be a little more peaceful.
$1:
Peaceful protests have happened all over the world as well. We see that here in Canada. I bet no country but us has seen the news about "peaceful CDN muslims protests". Just not good copy.
By "peaceful" protests, I guess you mean the one at Queen's Park on Sunday, where protesters were waving placards proclaiming "There can be no peace till Sharia is the law from East to West"? Is that the same one where speakers got up to urge their followers to "Burn the Danish economy down, so that the Danes will drown in their own blood?"
With countries full of people who spout of rhetoric like that, is it any wonder their societies are so violent? Like I said, still living in the 11th century.
I'll be willing to listen to what Islam has to say in about a thousand years when they evolve a bit more. Until that time, as far as I'm concerned, they can go back to the sand dunes if they don't like the way we do things in the west.
DerbyX @ Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:37 pm
DanishViking DanishViking:
DerbyX DerbyX:
A double standard?
Well you can view it any way you want to – but the Jyllands-Posten has done Christian caricatures before – in the present climate they are not running anything due to self censorship! Flemming Juste (chief editor of Jyllands-Posten): They have won – self censorship is a fact!
Another thing/ the Jyllands-Posten is a right wing paper – but not a fare right like some like to put it – and as noted before - making use of your freedom of expression does not mean that you have to take a stand on all sides at the same time.
- you can’t expect an editor not to be bias – as I learned last week in “60 minutes” - who visited Denmark and interviewed: one of the laying imams, a bleeding socialist, a left wing news paper editor and an old grumpy foreign minister – on these “objective” interviews they made their conclusion – I and about 80% other Danes don’t agree with them but it’s their right to put down any editorial line that they want.
The salient point was that they "choose" not to print something because it would offend people. They knew it was going to offend people and they knew that muslims consider it the gravest of insults.
Now your people, your gov't and your flag doesn't deserve the abuse it has been getting but the paper should have know a reaction was coming.
Tman1 Tman1:
Motorcycleboy Motorcycleboy:
P.S.-That Professor March guy deserves an Order of Canada for what he's done.
I agree. He even said he didn't care if he got fired and stands by his decision to make use of his
freedom of expression that the protestors seem to enjoy thoroughly enough. I probably worded my initial question wrong but I meant why non-Muslims so far have been quiet on speaking out
for freedom of expression and the cartoons, not why they are actually against it.
Actually, I think the mistake was mine and I misread your post. On second reading it's quite clear.
And I agree wholeheartedly. I can't believe newspaper editorialists, academics and the intelligentisia aren't marching in the streets in solidarity with the cartoonists.
I guess political correctness even trumps fundamental values like free speech and freedom from intimidation.
DerbyX @ Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:44 pm
$1:
Well you can simply "refuse to see it ass such" if you like. But if you want anyone to respect your opinion you'll have to actually justify why you "don't see it as such."
You can't just say "no it isn't" and expect that to be taken seriously Derby.
You post shit and expect to be taken seriously. Regardless, it is my opinion that its a double standard. No justification is needed.
$1:
Well, by all means, enlighten us with this "truth" Derby.
Read the quote associated with it then.
$1:
Oh. What a revelation! Islamic countries experience violence everyday.
Maybe if they could get their shit together and stop living in the 11th century, then their streets would be a little more peaceful.
Perhaps if the west wouldn't send armies into their lands every couple of years they might start to work things out for themselves.
$1:
By "peaceful" protests, I guess you mean the one at Queen's Park on Sunday, where protesters were waving placards proclaiming "There can be no peace till Sharia is the law from East to West"? Is that the same one where speakers got up to urge their followers to "Burn the Danish economy down, so that the Danes will drown in their own blood?"
Garbage. They didn't attack or burn anything down so a bunch of BS "allegedly" posted on placards doesn't mean shit.
$1:
I'll be willing to listen to what Islam has to say in about a thousand years when they evolve a bit more. Until that time, as far as I'm concerned, they can go back to the sand dunes if they don't like the way we do things in the west.
Perhaps they will when neanderthals stop attacking them. Leave them alone and they will leave you alone.
Tman1 Tman1:
but I meant why non-Muslims so far have been quiet on speaking out for freedom of expression and the cartoons, not why they are actually against it.
Well it’s a good question!
Many organizations (in Europe anyhow) that process the ability to gather large crowds are left wing – and almost all left wing politicians and organizations are saying: we protect freedom of expression – BUT one should also RESPECT religion. And that does not bring people on the streets!
Historically demonstrations in the west has been left wing organized – but even so we in the west does not have a tradition, like the Arab, of taking to the streets. We change the way we cast our vote at the next election!
But I would very mush hope these demonstrations will be carried out – and will be and inspiration for others – like when we saw the Poles (solidarity) revolting against their communist government – as we all know that became an all Polish demonstration and not a left or right!
Ps. In Denmark the left wing are onboard with the government - but I don’t think many Danes will take to the streets in the present spotlight – we are not used to that – and it’s very had decode what the official opinion in the rest of the west really is! Lots of contra dictionary comments are heard from different countries – only the Dutch, Germans and the Czech Republic have actually made it crystal clear that they stand unquestionably with Denmark on this issue.
Many also feel it has to be organized by at left wing organization or party – to make sure people will not see them as being racists.
$1:
Derby;
You post shit and expect to be taken seriously. Regardless, it is my opinion that its a double standard. No justification is needed.
If your "opinion" is that Jessica Simpson has a nice rack, then I agree, no "justification" is needed. But if you want people to listen to your "opinion" on a political issue, on a debating forum, then justifying it is a pretty solid tactic Derby.
$1:
Perhaps if the west wouldn't send armies into their lands every couple of years they might start to work things out for themselves.
How many US troops were in Iraq prior to 9/11 Derby?
And are you suggesting the "west" has no business in their lands? Does that "opinion" extend to Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan?
$1:
Garbage. They didn't attack or burn anything down so a bunch of BS "allegedly" posted on placards doesn't mean shit.
Allegedly?
$1:
NEWS STORY
Toronto Muslims air cartoon fury
Tom Blackwell
National Post
Monday, February 20, 2006
About 3,000 Muslims gathered in Toronto yesterday to peacefully but angrily condemn the Danish Muhammad cartoons, call for laws to ban such artwork and predict economic destruction for Denmark itself.
Organizers of the rally strived to keep the sentiments non-violent and tried physically to prevent reporters from interviewing one protester whose sign talked of a "countdown to justice" for the cartoonist behind the caricatures.
The protester explained, though, that he wanted Kurt Westergaard sent to jail under Danish law, not put to death as one Pakistani imam has urged.
On a bitterly cold day, others distributed pamphlets pushing for a boycott of Danish products, with colour pictures of the merchandise to drive home the point.
"We will not burn embassies down, we will not burn flags down," Sheikh Ahmad Shehab, a Toronto imam, shouted to the cheering crowd.
"We will watch the oppressors burn their economy down. We will watch them drown in their own blood.... They will not get our dollars. The oppressors will see soon what type of a turn their affairs will take. It will take a terrible turn."
Do you even pick up a fucking newspaper on occasion Derby? Do you watch the news? All this shit was widely reported. As was the comment about the Sharia Law sign.
Please tell me you don't get your entire perspective on the world from your Muslim "friends" and by reading your friend "Dayseed The Jailbird's" shit!
$1:
Perhaps they will when neanderthals stop attacking them. Leave them alone and they will leave you alone.
Neanderthal? Yes, of course, anyone like me who is troubled by people who threaten to cause an entire nation (Denmark) to "Drown in its own blood" is a neanderthal.
What if they started threatening to make Canada drown in it's own blood because of the Western Standard's decision to re-print the cartoons?
Would that be fair Derby? Or would that be the ranting and raving of a backward's assed bunch of savages?
And as for your comment about "leaving them alone" let's remember the Danish newspaper didn't go to the Gaza Strip and circulate the cartoons. They printed them in Denmark.
If we have no right to try to influence events in Muslim countries, as you assert, then what right do Muslims have to try to influence events in ours?