Maybe the Bush Daughters should go to Iraq: Matt Damon
sandorski @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 5:02 am
Very reasonably made point.
RUEZ @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 5:34 am
The U.S. still has a volunteer military do they not?
hwacker @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:05 am
Maybe Matt and his hollywood buddies should get off their asses and step up instead of shooting off. Sure they can play army man on the big screen lets see if they can dodge real bullets, hopefully some can’t.
Knoss @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:28 pm
$1:
The U.S. still has a volunteer military do they not?
Yes they do speaking of wich though, Lieutenants William and Harry of Wales should be given front line commands.
stratos @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:50 pm
Great point Matt join up your of age to go and fight. Why is it that people think every Actor or Actress point of view is so profound that it must be aired and repeated over and over. If these people are so smart why dont they run for a place in the gov. Very few get ellected when they do and fewer turn out to be good leaders.
Stick to what you do best and let it be. I'm sure I could tell Matt a thing or two about acting and how his money should be spent. Wonder if he would listen to me. If not then why the hell should I listen to an actor talking about war and polotics. Either show me you can do it first or shut the hell up.
sandorski @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:38 pm
RUEZ RUEZ:
The U.S. still has a volunteer military do they not?
That's not the point. The point is that those who have little to lose are willing to risk much more. If they(Politicians) had their own children to lose in the advent of War, they'd be much more cautious in declaring War or in prolonging War.
sandorski @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:52 pm
stratos stratos:
Great point Matt join up your of age to go and fight. Why is it that people think every Actor or Actress point of view is so profound that it must be aired and repeated over and over. If these people are so smart why dont they run for a place in the gov. Very few get ellected when they do and fewer turn out to be good leaders.
Stick to what you do best and let it be. I'm sure I could tell Matt a thing or two about acting and how his money should be spent. Wonder if he would listen to me. If not then why the hell should I listen to an actor talking about war and polotics. Either show me you can do it first or shut the hell up.
Stick to what you do best and let it be. I'm sure I could tell Matt a thing or two about acting and how his money should be spent. Wonder if he would listen to me. If not then why the hell should I listen to an actor talking about war and polotics. Either show me you can do it first or shut the hell up.
Like us posting here, Matt has every Right to voice an opinion. Like us here, if you don't want to hear that opinion(Matt's or other "Hollywood" types) you have the Right not to listen.
There are basically 2 groups who spread "Hollywood" opinions around:
1) ET and the Entertainment "News" machine whose job is Gossip and other Sensationalism surrounding Entertainment Celebrities. Basically Marketing
2) Those who love to hate "Hollywood" and knock down "liberals", because all of "Hollywood" is full of Socialist, Communist, liberals. Everyone knows that's the Truth, here's a quote from X as the Proof.
Certainly some politicians(both Left and Right) bring in Celebrities during some campaign speaches, not necessarily because those Celebrities are brilliant, but because those Celebrities bring attention and buzz to events.
Personally I think Celebrities don't add much to Political discourse and often they just distract away from issues at hand. As can be seen in this very thread, the Celebrity ends up becoming the issue rather than the Idea.
Tman1 @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:54 pm
I guess that includes multi-million dollar actors to get shipped off to war. In any case, I think it's too late. Iraq is lost and the U.S is pulling out soon.
Motorcycleboy @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:01 pm
Knoss Knoss:
Yes they do speaking of wich though, Lieutenants William and Harry of Wales should be given front line commands.
You're absolutely correct. They should be sent onto the front line. Just like their uncle Prince Andrew was during the Falklands War in 1982.
Motorcycleboy @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:07 pm
sandorski sandorski:
That's not the point. The point is that those who have little to lose are willing to risk much more. If they(Politicians) had their own children to lose in the advent of War, they'd be much more cautious in declaring War or in prolonging War.
And those who have even less to lose are always eager to opine on the subject. Matt Damon has as much chance of getting stuck driving a Humvee around in Bagdahd as a raving heterosexual like me has of catching AIDS (anally injected death sentence).
He's entitled to his opinion. But without experience, it carries as much weight as Nicole Richie. If Damon wants to criticize others for NOT fighting over there, then he should shut up, ruck up, and get behind a .50 cal.
Scape @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:20 pm
Does anyone know the ratio between how many actors and family members of actors are serving as compared to how many politicians and their family members are?
RUEZ @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:21 pm
sandorski sandorski:
RUEZ RUEZ:
The U.S. still has a volunteer military do they not?
That's not the point. The point is that those who have little to lose are willing to risk much more. If they(Politicians) had their own children to lose in the advent of War, they'd be much more cautious in declaring War or in prolonging War.
Motorcycleboy @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:56 pm
Scape Scape:
Does anyone know the ratio between how many actors and family members of actors are serving as compared to how many politicians and their family members are?
I'm not sure what the ratio is. But Minnesota Senator Becky Lourie had a son killed in Iraq in May 2005. Senator John Mcain, himself a former Vietnam POW has a son in the Navy who will be serving in Iraq soon, Senator Jim Webb has a son serving there, and a huge proportion of senators and congressmen are former members of the US armed forces, some being Viet Nam veterans.
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Tori Spelling, Brittany Spears or any of the other vacuous Hollywood losers have a loved one serving in the "Mess-O-Potamia".
In fact, I would go so far as to say that the US Congress and Senate has far more people with personal involvement with their nation's armed forces than we have here in Canada.
Name one person in Canada's Parliament who has a son serving in Afghanistan?
While we're at it, find me one, other than Conservative Defence Minister Gordon O'Conner, who ever wore this country's uniform.
Arctic_Menace @ Sat Dec 16, 2006 9:03 pm
$1:
Matt Damon has as much chance of getting stuck driving a Humvee around in Bagdahd as a raving heterosexual like me has of catching AIDS (anally injected death sentence).
Your bigotry is not needed in this thread.