Rice gives 9/11 testimony under oath [LIVE]

On CNN.com you can listen to the testimony live right now. Link to story - here

Check out CNN radio link can be found on the front page of CNN.com

   

How the hell can something titled "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States" be an historic document?

Condi Rice is a liar.

   

Yeah she danced around some question, im glad the republicans on the commitie did do there best to question.

   

She talked for how long and without giving a yes or no answer? After reviewing the interview myself the best possible spin has been put on the patroit act.

See for yourself

Citing 'structural problems', she made the whole diplomatic approach sound as if we were swatting at flies and not attacking the source of the problem. In her opening she said that the terrorists had declared war on the US but that the US had not declared war on them, that in fact the US was not on a war footing. Flimsy, considering activity in Iraq. What kind of reaction where they expecting?

   

Counties rarely declare war, they hardley ever do it.

   

She may well be the first female president of the good 'ol U S of A.

   

since she did infact dodge questions...how did she lie?....seems to me if she had answered some of the useless politically bs questions..she very well could have gone up on treason charges....as ways n means is ussually classified....

MY whole life there have been dailly threats directed at the usa..why should those be any different....as planes turned into bombs was a new one...?

or old looking at ww2....

why was president clinton given a pass after the first bombing...this whole thing is bs..aint gonna solve squat...

yeah I d vote for dr rice...but would jesse and the rev accept her...najh shes too smart for them....

   

Zipper Billy Clinton provide three and a half hours of testimony yesterday, right after the good doctor. What did he have to say I wonder. Oops, that's right, he testified in-camera.

Where are the lefties when they need to stand up and be counted. Here is one of their prime heroes, the man they would see as el Presidente encore, and not a one of them is touting what he did or didn't say. Surely you can surmise, fantasise, wish real hard and/or place a tooth under your pillow.

Wonder what he would say - that he's an admitted adulterer, an admitted perjurer, that he lied time and again to America, his family and the world - on camera, that he obstructed justice, that he has a penchant for young interns, that his wife was complicit in the suicide/murder of Foster, that there was no fraud in Whitewater, mmm . . . anything else I wonder . . . . ?

Let's have him testify in public and under oath. Turn about. . . . ?

   

Clinton lied about getting a blowjob. George and Condi and all their crooked little pals lied to start a war, they lied about their crokked connections to corporations that they've allowed to write policy, and, now that they can't remain silent, they are lying about their complete lack of action before 9/11.

I ask again, how the hell can something called, "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States," be an historic document? It isn't. She was lying when she said that because she couldn't evade the question.

Since the attack happened on Bush's watch, when is he going to be testifying live and under oath? Maybe he can tell us all why he stopped the drone over-flights and let the meetings about terrorism, specifically al Qaeda, stop. Maybe he can explain why his administration was worrying about Cold War strategies in the post-Cold War world. Maybe he can explain why he allowed the bin Laden family to be flown out of the US when nothing else was allowed to fly.

   

And. . . . . come on, tell us what else he lied about, come on do tell . . . . You know you know don't you?


Yup, another clever statement. How long had they been in the WH? Election in November - terrorists flying jets into buildings in September - math is not one of your strong points is it?


Perhaps it was somewhat dated by WH standards. You know, maybe from last week or last month or last year or maybe even yesterday - but maybe in their parlance it's known as 'dated', but that wouldn't occur to you would it prole - so they must be guilty - of something!! anything!! right? But, if I'm correct, would she still be lying?


Aren't you clever, why you almost pay lie to my statement above about your mathematic ability. They certainly did 9/11 you silly banana you - how long do you think it took them to obtain the skills to do dat do you t'ink?


Maybe he can - maybe you can tell us all how frequently you take a dump (we really don't care to know). Understand what I'm saying prole?

Let me explain in simple terms you'll understand. There are some things, and that would be why your mentor and hero Zipper Willy and the current President of the United States George W. Bush, aren't going to talk about, in or out of camera - do you understand the reasoning for that? Again, stay really close here; it boils down to - do they talk about the capabilities (read secret stuff here ok?) on camera and alert terrorist organisations, or do they talk in camera where you better pray they keep the secret stuff secret? Still here?

If they keep the secret stuff secret then maybe, if we're all lucky there won't be a wmd going off in a neighborhood near you. mmmkay?

If you find all, or just some of the above a little complicated, let me know and I promise I'll write something so basic and all enlightening, even you won't have any difficulty understanding.

Sheesh already, what's with you?

   

Yeah, whatever Karra.

   

The now famous PDB said there was 70 ongoing FBI investigations yet 9-11 happened. It is no secret that the FBI and CIA do not share Intel. This was not a problem for the US until Osama, who is both a domestic and foreign threat. He managed to exploit the weakness of the US defenses. Caused the death of thousands and showed to the rest of the world that the US can be defied successfully. The Democrats feared that dealing with Osama too harshly would create a martyr and was more focused on capture. Considering he was a part of one of the most powerful families in the Arab world, it was a prudent consideration. The Bush admin was concerned about finishing what they started, Iraq, this gave Osama the window of opportunity to sucker punch the US while they were giving him less attention. A bad call by Bush, but understandable. This forced the US to react, not lead, to events. It had to test the waters in Afghanistan to see if they could pull off Iraq. Winning the war was easy but the true objective of winning the peace is a long way off.

   

They haven't won the war yet, Scape. A majority of the Iraqi people oppose them and an increasing number are willing to pick up arms. Just because Bush declared the war over doesn't mean that it is.

Bush got that PDB and remained on vacation...he didn't care. The FBI and CIA may not have shared information too well, but Clinton made them meet anyway. Bush cancelled the meetings. He also cancelled surveillance over-flights of Afghanistan.