Do you think the Media Racially Bios? WHY??

1. In the Duke Lacrosse Rape Probe of "White" boys raping a "Black" girl, the media all but convicted the boys of rape before all the evidence was available.

2. Another Duke Rape case, but this time it was a "Black" man who raped a "White" women.

They have a video of the rape and assult, but the media has buried the story.



News Source

   

Because racial profiling has been deemed eeeevil, by the great Social engineers, rather than a casual observation.

   

The media bios people all the time.

Black people when it comes to getting the attention of rednecks. White people when it comes to tree huggers.

And, most importantly, the latest popularly hated group. Right now, that'd be the muslims or, to an extent, every member or a religion other than Christianism - and even then, I'd be ready to bet tons of media will soon start aiming Christians.

   

Well I was just watching this on the News Network, the fella only had $50,000 bail.

The District Attorney is not even involved with this case yet, despite the fact there is a video of the attack.

   

OH MY GOD, I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU ARE TRYING TO SAY THAT THE MEDIA DUMPS ALL OVER THE WHITE MAN. THAT IS UTTERLY RIDICULOUS. I'M EMBARASSED FOR YOU.

AND ITS 'BIASED' NOT 'BIOS'.

   

I was in Toronto in the early very late 80s and I remember the media and police were struggling with how not to appear racial in news reporting of the overwhelmingly disproportionate number of people of colour involved in alleged crimes. The solution was that the Toronto Police would no longer collect or provide racial or ethnic statistics and that the media would no longer report colour or ethnicity unless it was imperative to the story or to the actual cause of justice.

Does anybody living in the GTA know if they still practice this nonsense?