Will the U.S. actually default on its debt?
$1:
President Obama has locked top Republicans and Democrats in a room to try and hammer out a deal to cut the U.S. deficit and raise the U.S. Treasury’s borrowing authority by Aug. 2. If the government is unable to borrow more money it may not be able to pay interest on its debt — and a string of bills from doctor’s bills to army wages.
Q: How real is the Aug. 2 deadline?
A: U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner set the current deadline for the United States to either raise its US$14.3-million debt ceiling or default on its obligations in May, after making and extending a handful of others earlier in the year.
Unlike previous deadlines, “This August/early August deadline is fairly firm,” says Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at RBC Capital Markets in New York.
Yet, with Treasury officials reportedly meeting in secret this week to come up with possible contingency plans, Mr. Porcelli said an extension of sorts may be in the cards.
“I think you cannot rule other the possibility that the folks in D.C. invent another accounting gimmick to buy more time,” he said, pointing to a past move to tap into government funds to stave off default.
“It was definitely a novel approach at the time. I don’t think such novelty can be ruled out right now.”
Q: What if they miss the deadline by a few days?
A: If talks drag on but are still close and lawmakers look set to raise the debt ceiling within a few days, a temporary reprieve may be possible. Markets would likely drop but ratings agencies like Moody’s Investors Service might hold off on a downgrade for a few days.
But the grace period would not be long. Mr. Geithner started warning Congress about this in January, and a failure to find a solution would raise serious red flags with China and other major creditors.
Q: What are the major sticking points in the negotiations?
A: In earlier sessions, negotiators identified roughly US$2-trillion in spending cuts that could form the basis of a deal. Republicans walked out of those talks after Democrats called for an additional US$400-billion in budget savings by ending a range of tax breaks that benefit wealthy people and certain businesses, like the oil and gas industry. On Wednesday, the two Republicans who were involved in those talks indicated that they could accept some “revenue raisers” in a deal. And indicating that even more ambitious plans may be afoot, Democrats said Mr. Obama will push negotiators to double their target to US$4-trillion in budget savings over 10 years.
Q: What will the government cut if the deadline passes?
A: Analysts say the U.S. Treasury will have no choice but to pay interest on the debt first and then make decisions about what to pay next.
Averaged out through August, 44% of bills and obligations could not be paid, making it impossible to avoid deep cuts to popular programs, according to the Bipartisan Policy Centre, a Washington think-tank.
“Remember where the bulk of spending rests. It would almost necessarily have to come from reductions in either Social Security, Medicare, national defence — basically in the so-called income-security categories,” Mr. Porcelli said, noting that bills would start to go unpaid “in short order,” after the default.
“There’s obviously a lot of sensitivity to those items on both sides of the aisle,” he said, predicting many lost votes if politicians allow it to get to that point.
Q: Would it really be all that bad?
A: Yes.
Mr. Geithner and Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chairman, have warned that failure to get this under control will be “catastrophic,” sparking market panic, a spike in interest rates, a plunging greenback and lack of credit.
In a note to clients on Jun. 30, Mr. Porcelli wrote that on a dolllar-for-dollar basis, the cuts the government would have to make would equate to about 5% of annual GDP.
“With the economy barely clocking in above 2.5% since the recession ended, another severe downturn would be just about a done deal,” he said.
What’s more, the effects are likely to be felt right away.
“The immediate aspect of this is a recession, and I don’t mean ‘immediate’ in a loose way,” Mr. Porcelli said.
“I don’t think anyone should underestimate what sort of impact this would have.”
http://business.financialpost.com/2011/ ... -its-debt/
xerxes @ Fri Jul 08, 2011 3:13 pm
The US will default if the GOp has its way. They are willing to ruin the economy simply to get at Obama.
Thanos @ Fri Jul 08, 2011 3:28 pm
The House passed a $649 billion defence budget, so obviously nothing military will be on the table.
Brenda @ Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:17 pm
If you start giving the ones that don't need it and can afford to go without no more tax breaks, then tax the big companies a little bit extra (AND do away with all the loopholes, so finally have them pay what they owe), stop fight useless wars that are not your problem, and then recalculate...
Stop take it out of the pockets of the workers. They are stretched further than they can be stretched.
But hey, who am I, what do I know...
xerxes @ Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:21 pm
Brenda Brenda:
If you start giving the ones that don't need it and can afford to go without no more tax breaks, then tax the big companies a little bit extra (AND do away with all the loopholes, so finally have them pay what they owe), stop fight useless wars that are not your problem, and then recalculate...
Stop take it out of the pockets of the workers. They are stretched further than they can be stretched.
But hey, who am I, what do I know...
Well according to current GOP dogma, that kind of talk puts you to the left of MArx and Engels.
Brenda @ Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:52 pm
I'm ok with that. Sometimes it takes a little left leaning, and other times it takes a little right leaning to take the turns in the road 
Another solution of course could be just to shoot all the druggies, sick people, unemployed, prisoners, welfare recipients, low-wage earners, home owners who just got laid off and can't afford their mortgage anymore, homeless, alcoholics, mentally disabled, middle aged, elderly, middle income earners and just keep the high end earners.

Brenda Brenda:
I'm ok with that. Sometimes it takes a little left leaning, and other times it takes a little right leaning to take the turns in the road

Another solution of course could be just to shoot all the druggies, sick people, unemployed, prisoners, welfare recipients, low-wage earners, home owners who just got laid off and can't afford their mortgage anymore, homeless, alcoholics, mentally disabled, middle aged, elderly, middle income earners and just keep the high end earners.

Sounds like something the Republican Party could get behind.
Brenda @ Fri Jul 08, 2011 7:31 pm
In that case, I should add "all religious people, regardless of religion" 
xerxes xerxes:
The US will default if the GOp has its way. They are willing to ruin the economy simply to get at Obama.
That's exactly the way I see it too. It's not about what's good for the country, it's about defeating Obama in 2012.
So why should it concern Canadians? Well, if the US defaults on it's debts, it will very likely start a worldwide financial meltdown and that's certainly going to hurt all of us.
Timetrvlr Timetrvlr:
xerxes xerxes:
The US will default if the GOp has its way. They are willing to ruin the economy simply to get at Obama.
That's exactly the way I see it too. It's not about what's good for the country, it's about defeating Obama in 2012.
So why should it concern Canadians? Well, if the US defaults on it's debts, it will very likely start a worldwide financial meltdown and that's certainly going to hurt all of us.
pfff.. there are a lot of other countries that will default long before anyone
thinks of letting the US default.
The States will be at the end of the list, not the beginning.
Yep, America's primary creditors can't really afford for the US to default.
The USA is the GM of the world.

rickc @ Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:48 pm
Yeah lets blame everything on the GOP. Its all our fault......NOT! We do not have this huge deficit because we are taxing the American wealthy at too low a rate. We have this huge deficit because the American government has a huge spending problem. These are the same people who gave us $1000 toilet seats, and bridges to nowhere. Why should I pay more taxes so the government can continue to spend money like a drunken sailor on shore leave for the first time in a year? Giving these assholes more money is like giving a bigger donation to a crack whore. They will blow it in minutes, and can not even be sure where the money went. Its never enough for these assholes. They have never met a pork barrel big government giveaway program that they do not support. Why? Because it buys votes! Lets look past this left wing myth about the wealthy not paying their fair share of taxes, and interject some truth into this debate. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Nearly-ha ... l?x=0&.v=1
Almost half of Americans pay zero federal income taxes. Half! These are the people who endlessly feed at the tit of big government. The Democrats keep these people on the dole, and shamelessly buy their votes. These people are entirely dependent on the government for their survival. No taxes,free rent,free medical care, free school lunches, foodstamps, free daycare, a free check in your mailbox every month to smoke away in your crackpipe. Just keep voting for the Democrats to keep the gravytrain rolling. Just promise to wear that teeshirt we mailed you [and don't forget your poster we provided demanding the rich pay their fair share of taxes] and attend any rallies we might be having in your area when we call you. Hell if the rally is more than 2 miles away, we will throw in free transportation and lunch as well. Not a bad gig. Live for free in exchange for attending a few rallies each year. Check out the link where it states that the top ten percent of Americans are paying 73% of the taxes. Do you still believe that the rich are not paying their fair share of taxes? Fuck raising the debt limit! Start slashing. I would rather give thousands in contributions to right wing causes than give these dipshits one more red cent.
Scape @ Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:59 pm
The US spends more on air conditioning then it does on NASA. The GOP would rather kill the economy then lift a finger to help Obama, everyone and their dog knows that.
rickc @ Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:36 am
Scape Scape:
I do not understand your quote. When President Obama was running for President a full two years before the election,the economy was still good. All he had to differentiate himself from Hillary Clinton, was the Iraq war. He touted how he voted against the war,yet his opponent Hillary had voted for it. The anti war mantra was solely in his camp. As the economy soured, he brought up the point of all the money the U.S. could save by ending the war. After two years in the White House, he still has not ended that war. I seen on the news today that 2 U.S. servicemen died in Iraq today. In fact President Obama has added to the theaters that the U.S. is fighting in. We are currently fighting in Libya, and Bahrain as well. As far as NASA's budget is concerned, how can the GOP take the blame for that? The President enjoyed a majority in the House and Senate uppon arrival to the White House. He could have passed any budgets he wanted to. No one could have stood in his way if he wanted to pour billions into NASA. NASA fading away is happening on his watch, I have not heard one peep from him wanting to revive NASA.