Anti-Canuck Medal
I just noticed I received this medal and it doesn't look like I was nominated for it so how did I get it?
Just like the Soldier medal, it's given to those who scream it out. Because it's a negative medal, you can't reject it. So no vote is given.
Especially since the Medals description is an exact quote from you saying "I'm Anti-Canada"
tritium @ Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:02 am
The Queen gave it to you.
tritium tritium:
ROTFL
The Queen gave it to you.
ROTFL
$1:
Just like the Soldier medal, it's given to those who scream it out. Because it's a negative medal, you can't reject it. So no vote is given.
Just like the Soldier medal, it's given to those who scream it out. Because it's a negative medal, you can't reject it. So no vote is given.
Well Canuck is more a reference to Canadians not Canada. I have nothing against any Canadians and it implies such so I do not agree with it's format. My attitude against Canada lies it it's political and government system which many people openly criticise so why are they not given the same medal? Many have even made remarks of the Queen of Canada and have openly expressed no loyalty to her or to the crown and would openly overthrow the same system. I think even you have said so, so how are you not "Anti-Canada" for not supporting the same system you attack yourself? If you wish to give me some western separatist medal I will give you that but If I'm going to get an "anti-canuck" one for criticising our government and constitution that you openly do yourself then a lot of people should be getting one.
$1:
To Nominate or Apply for Medal
First of all, it is always best to be nominated for a medal from another member, rather than yourself.
Some of the medals won't be given to very new members, need to be around for awhile.
To apply/nominate for a medal please Start a new topic in this format:
"Membername for Federalist Medal"
the post should contain the following:
1) Medal receiver's name
2) Medal name
3) Justification for getting the medal
4) "Optional" refrences to posts that back the justification
After that the nomination must recieve a minimun 3 endoursments from other members to be then considered by a moderator. Getting 3 endoursments does not automatically mean that person gets the medal, it is still up to a moderator or myself.
Endoursment posts should also have a bit of justification, but I guess not totaly necassary.
Guidlines to Receive a Medal
1) You cannot earn a medal until you have 100 or more posts.
2) One will apply to be given themselves a medal if they think they deserve it, or one will nominate another for a medal if they think they deserve it. Then three members will have to endorse his/her right to have the medal they want. If three members do not indorse them then he/her will not be granted the medal of their choosing. However, if they do get endorsed the matter well be addressed to the moderators and they will give the final call on whether or not they deserve the medal.
3) The endorser will have to write a decent write-up on why he/she deserves the certain medal after he/she applies or gets chosen for a nomination. Instead of just saying “I nominate x for medal w”. You need to provide a good amount of proof (links/examples) and need to be very clear on why they deserve the medal. If he/she truly deserves the medal it will be easy to convince the moderators and give proof on why they deserve it.
4) Medals that aren’t deserved by people anymore, such as someone who may have the “Topic Jedi” medal suddenly stops creating a lot of topics and then never is heard of in the forum for a long length of time will have his/her medal taken away from them.
No where it says you automatically get a medal either. It says you need to be nominated for one and some justification or proof needs to be provided for getting such. I see no nomination thread or any reasoning thus proper protocol at least according to the rules this forum has made has not been followed.
That's a load of crap and I protest this very strongly!
What star chamber came up with this and where is it's proof?
You might as well start handing that one out to me and a whole lot of others because nothing that Clogeroo has said was anti-Canadian.
QBC @ Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:48 am
ridenrain ridenrain:
That's a load of crap and I protest this very strongly!
What star chamber came up with this and where is it's proof?
You might as well start handing that one out to me and a whole lot of others because nothing that Clogeroo has said was anti-Canadian.
Mellow out....
I'm looking into how he got it. There was a time there when the medals were being handed out by the basket load. He might have even got it by accident. I don't see a thread to nominate him for it yet, but give me a few minutes to snoop through the medal forum.
OPP @ Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:48 am
He sound more pro-Canuck to me?
If he wants to sever the chord between Canada and Britain/England then that to me is a statement that Canada should be even more independent and "Canadian".
QBC @ Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:59 am
Well, without reading every post in every thread in the medals forum, I have to say there doesn't appear to be any nomination for this medal. Not sure how he got it, but it is very possible as to how we get a members name into the spot for awarding a medal that he could have got it by accident. You should have received an email that you were awarded a medal though the instant it was done. Anyway, I'll nuke it.
$1:
Well, without reading every post in every thread in the medals forum, I have to say there doesn't appear to be any nomination for this medal. Not sure how he got it, but it is very possible as to how we get a members name into the spot for awarding a medal that he could have got it by accident. You should have received an email that you were awarded a medal though the instant it was done. Anyway, I'll nuke it.
Yes I never received anything as to why I got it. Anyway thank you for removing it.
tritium @ Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:14 pm
Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
Well, without reading every post in every thread in the medals forum, I have to say there doesn't appear to be any nomination for this medal. Not sure how he got it, but it is very possible as to how we get a members name into the spot for awarding a medal that he could have got it by accident. You should have received an email that you were awarded a medal though the instant it was done. Anyway, I'll nuke it.
Yes I never received anything as to why I got it. Anyway thank you for removing it.
Pussy.

Waaaaah!! I want my Anti-Canuck pin removed too. Waaaah!!
QBC @ Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:19 pm
tritium tritium:
Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
Well, without reading every post in every thread in the medals forum, I have to say there doesn't appear to be any nomination for this medal. Not sure how he got it, but it is very possible as to how we get a members name into the spot for awarding a medal that he could have got it by accident. You should have received an email that you were awarded a medal though the instant it was done. Anyway, I'll nuke it.
Yes I never received anything as to why I got it. Anyway thank you for removing it.
Pussy.

Waaaaah!! I want my Anti-Canuck pin removed too. Waaaah!!
Is that because you want it replaced with the pothead medal???????
tritium @ Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:30 pm
QBC QBC:
tritium tritium:
Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
Well, without reading every post in every thread in the medals forum, I have to say there doesn't appear to be any nomination for this medal. Not sure how he got it, but it is very possible as to how we get a members name into the spot for awarding a medal that he could have got it by accident. You should have received an email that you were awarded a medal though the instant it was done. Anyway, I'll nuke it.
Yes I never received anything as to why I got it. Anyway thank you for removing it.
Pussy.

Waaaaah!! I want my Anti-Canuck pin removed too. Waaaah!!
Is that because you want it replaced with the pothead medal???????

yeah, NO.
Hyack @ Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:36 pm
pothead medal??....where's mine??? if anyone here deserves the potheda meadle i think............ ummm what was I saying ??