Iceowl for Master Debator
Nay to IceOwl.
ziggy @ Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:24 pm
OPP OPP:
What the hell's happening to this Forum???
First dayseed, now IceOwl???
Are the rightwingers (atlast) conseding?
Didnt you get nominated for an annoying medal? Or was that someone else?
OPP @ Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:27 pm
ziggy ziggy:
OPP OPP:
What the hell's happening to this Forum???
First dayseed, now IceOwl???
Are the rightwingers (atlast) conseding?
Didnt you get nominated for an annoying medal? Or was that someone else?

Yeah, I looked it up last time u mentioned it.. but I couldn't find anything..
At any rate.. I never got one..
add mine he is as good as those who have it.
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
[trumpet] Feelings of grandeur at their finest

Nope. Once again what I've done is set up a gambit in which either people here agree that some of the greatest minds happily used insults, at which point I win, or you people stick to your original argument that using insults degrades the poster at which point you've got to say how the above insults detract from the monumental contributions made by each, which is an exercise in abject stupidty and baseless vainglory. And I'd win too.
There should be a medal for people who can easily make those type of gambits...
Ridenrain,
I don't even know what your point is. If it helps, I can direct you to a site where you can make a construction paper Wookie mask. It's a kind of Zen like when Mr. Miyagi taught Daniel how to block by waxing his car. Just sing, "You're the best, around, nothins' gonna ever bring you down" while doing it.
OPP @ Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:31 pm
Dayseed Dayseed:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
[trumpet] Feelings of grandeur at their finest

Nope. Once again what I've done is set up a gambit in which either people here agree that some of the greatest minds happily used insults, at which point I win, or you people stick to your original argument that using insults degrades the poster at which point you've got to say how the above insults detract from the monumental contributions made by each, which is an exercise in abject stupidty and baseless vainglory. And I'd win too.
There should be a medal for people who can easily make those type of gambits...

Ridenrain,
I don't even know what your point is. If it helps, I can direct you to a site where you can make a construction paper Wookie mask. It's a kind of Zen like when Mr. Miyagi taught Daniel how to block by waxing his car. Just sing, "You're the best, around, nothins' gonna ever bring you down" while doing it.
HaaaaAHAHAHAAAAHAAahaaahaaHAAAhahahahahahaaaahaaaaaaa!!!!!!
Wohoho. Well-said, dear old Churchill. Such masterful oration and wit proves you the master debater.
Didn't you clue in that those people that you mentioned are important and you are not?
Aside from you're one fan, you need to come to terms with you're lot in life.
..and that's as far as I go. 
Dayseed Dayseed:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
[trumpet] Feelings of grandeur at their finest

Nope. Once again what I've done is set up a gambit in which either people here agree that some of the greatest minds happily used insults, at which point I win, or you people stick to your original argument that using insults degrades the poster at which point you've got to say how the above insults detract from the monumental contributions made by each, which is an exercise in abject stupidty and baseless vainglory. And I'd win too.
There should be a medal for people who can easily make those type of gambits...

Ridenrain,
I don't even know what your point is. If it helps, I can direct you to a site where you can make a construction paper Wookie mask. It's a kind of Zen like when Mr. Miyagi taught Daniel how to block by waxing his car. Just sing, "You're the best, around, nothins' gonna ever bring you down" while doing it.
love the sig line.....I will sleep soundly with the comfort of my quoted words
Dayseed Dayseed:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
[trumpet] Feelings of grandeur at their finest

Nope. Once again what I've done is set up a gambit in which either people here agree that some of the greatest minds happily used insults, at which point I win, or you people stick to your original argument that using insults degrades the poster at which point you've got to say how the above insults detract from the monumental contributions made by each, which is an exercise in abject stupidty and baseless vainglory. And I'd win too.
There should be a medal for people who can easily make those type of gambits...

Ridenrain,
I don't even know what your point is. If it helps, I can direct you to a site where you can make a construction paper Wookie mask. It's a kind of Zen like when Mr. Miyagi taught Daniel how to block by waxing his car. Just sing, "You're the best, around, nothins' gonna ever bring you down" while doing it.
What is it you are trying to win?
lily lily:
$1:
I say no...he is smart enough for the medal with out a single doubt....but he is just a straight up bully end of story. Fatbasturd on me.
If only I could get that embroidered on a throw pillow
I like the bolded part.

freudian slip me thinks perhaps
ziggy @ Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:41 pm
lily lily:
$1:
I say no...he is smart enough for the medal with out a single doubt....but he is just a straight up bully end of story. Fatbasturd on me.
If only I could get that embroidered on a throw pillow
I like the bolded part.

Maybe thats what he wants on his lil pillow.
Thanks for the input Ziggy 
ziggy @ Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:48 pm
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
Thanks for the input Ziggy

I cant wait.
Dayseed Dayseed:
When it comes to using insults as automatically invalidating the argument, people here need to realize that all of the greats have done it.
Voltaire's Candide was a massive slap in the face of Leibniz and his positive optimism. Leibniz is made to look like quite the ass in the character of Dr. Pangloss. Shall we toss Voltaire onto the rubbish heap because he could be nasty?
What about Winston Churchill? During a radio broadcast to all of Britain on June 22nd, 1941, he referred to Hitler as "a monster of wickedness" and a "blood-thirsty guttersnipe." I guess according to the people on this thread, Winston Churchill is no master debater, just an internet "flamer".
Sir Thomas Moore called Martin Luther "a pimp, an apostate, a rustic, and a friar" after Martin Luther called the Catholic church "brainless and illiterate beast in papist form" and those who remained Catholic "a whole filthy pack of asses." I guess those two need to be scrubbed clean from history.
Sir John A. MacDonald threw up in Parliament and quipped "I get sick sometimes not because of drink or any other cause, except that I am forced to listen to the ranting of my honorable opponent." Uh-oh, time to reissue the $10 bill!
Of course, that's just me doing that silly little thing of rattling off facts in the face of sour-puss opinion.
-Mario- -Mario-:
I am sure that you guys can exchange views without the calling names...

Shamelessly stolen from another thread.
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
freudian slip me thinks perhaps

It it pretty pink?
Please don't tell me you're wearing it.