1  2  3  Next

How about a Red Tory medal.

Allot of Red Tories probably would not qualify for a right wing medal and neocons have their own medal so why not Red Tories.

After all it is a canadian movement

   

What exactly do you mean by red tory?

   

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Tory

   

Dang I love Wikipedia

That sounds like a great idea Hamilton!

   

yep its usefull

although its NOT god

   

It could be!!

Oh mighty God Wikiepedia!

Hey, it's got a ring to it

   

carefull don't let Tman and mustang see you say that!!!!

   

   

Being a professed Red Tory myself, I do like your medal idea.

   

Oh…one more thing…the wikipedia article isn’t a great political definition of Red Toryism, but it will suffice…I guess.

   

Well it is wikipedia, you can make adjustments as you see fit.

   

So, there's to be a medal for a school of thought that Wikipedia says is dead?

   

It never says its dead just not as predominant as it was before

time will tell wether the conservative's attempts to stomp it out will be successfull

   

Am I a red tory?

   

I believe in a sphere for free enterprise and a sphere for an activist government. I believe that the Liberals have muddled the two together while the NDP and far-right proponents place too much emphasis on one over the other.

I believe that the free market, individual initiative and self-reliance should be encouraged as the keys to prosperity. I want government to collaborate with businesses, not work against them, to reduce needless red tape and taxes that hurt competitiveness. However, I do not adhere to the American Republicanism that is manifest in the Canadian Alliance. I do not agree with the neo-conservative belief that individuals should be entitled to follow self-interest for its own sake, magically leading to some "public good" through the invisible hand of the market with no government role beyond protection of property rights. I believe that faith in the law of the jungle will produce a jungle.

I believe that faith in the public good will lead to the public good. I believe that the invisible hand of the market is important, but it must be steadied by the hand of public responsibility. I believe that a conscious and direct consideration of an individual's free-market activity should be the public good, and government involvement is an integral part of this.

I believe that the greatest financial gains in the world do not make a society better if they are accrued through environmental destruction, creating an underclass of the working poor, or the starvation of key public goods. The free market has shown itself to be a poor provider of universal education, health care, a clean environment and public infrastructure, such as water systems, which exist for the benefit of all and which, ultimately, make us more economically competitive.

I respect the marketplace, but I do not worship it as the solution to all problems. As part of this, I oppose flat taxes, the privatization of core services and the far-right dogma of massive tax cuts trumping all other policy considerations -- a dogma which unite-the-righters such as Mike Harris and Preston Manning have already espoused as a main policy of the new party.

I embrace multiculturalism and biculturalism as important Canadian values. In a world bled by intolerance, these values make Canada "a light unto the nations." If these are important, then government involvement in their promotion is not a waste, but a virtue.

I believe that immigrants add to our prosperity and immigration to Canada should be increased. Immigrants do not increase our crime rates or steal our jobs or take our university spots. Those who exploit isolated crimes by immigrants for political gain do not deserve public office. Those who fan the flames of fear of rising crime, when Canada's homicide rate has steadily declined from its 1976 peak, also do not deserve public office.

I believe that aboriginal self-government, which is both an inherent and a constitutional right, is the key to aboriginals growing in self-reliance and harmonious relations with Canadians as a whole.

I believe asymmetrical federalism is the genius of Canadian confederation and the reason our diverse regions have worked together to create the best country on earth. I believe that the provinces are inherently different, and their jurisdictions should reflect this. I believe devolving more powers to the provinces would weaken our nation. We need fewer provincial barriers, not more. We need more ties that bind us, not fewer.
I believe that Canada's existence requires a constant treasuring of the above values. Canada has been woven together by threads of accommodation, both powerful and fragile -- powerful in what they support, fragile in that the passions of division are a constant threat. Never believe that Canada has a right to eternally exist. It exists because we as Canadians will it to exist. This existence is easily endangered by those who stoke the divisions of region versus region, immigrant versus non-immigrant, aboriginal versus non-aboriginal, and rich versus poor.

I know that Red Toryism is not dead. We will fight to preserve our traditional party as a viable option. If we fail, we will still be a decisive factor in Canadian politics. Red Toryism is more than a party; it is a Canadian idea, and good ideas never die.


If you follow something like that than ya

oh and they are USUALLY monarchist

   

1  2  3  Next