Regina For Master Debator!
fatbasturd @ Fri May 18, 2007 6:50 pm
OPP OPP:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
OPP OPP:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
OPP OPP:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
OPP OPP:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
OPP OPP:
WDHIII WDHIII:
Ya know I brought this up the other day but its seems to have gone in one ear and out the other....
Your tongue in cheek "nomination" isnt fooling anyone and just goes to prove what we already know about you.
Youre an asshat.
$1:
Public complaint (including forum topics) regarding the moderation of this site, including the deletion of content or user suspension, is not acceptable. These issues are between the Moderators and the members involved. Concerns or complaints on Moderator decisions should be directed to the CKA Administration in a Private Message only.
Your tongue in cheek "nomination" isnt fooling anyone and just goes to prove what we already know about you.
Youre an asshat.
yeah.. But you'll have to prove it..
This is a serious nomination.
Run home from school?
Actually.. I did most of the kicking.. and I regret most of it.. that's why I cant stand bullies like you or WDHIII... or Regina. We all made some shity decitions which I today regret more than anything.
cry me a river ....your actions and post reap you the way you are treated....If you think i am a bully...you must have one fuck of a time in the real world.I guess I haven't got enough of the real world just yet.... But I know some who know just what I'm talking about. I have no excuses... And I know that if there is a heaven.. I, most likely, won't end up there.
It doesn't matter.
Of course not BF... I'm sure you have nothing to regret.
OPP @ Fri May 18, 2007 6:51 pm
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
not since i sobered up
Another day.. another breath.
OPP @ Fri May 18, 2007 6:59 pm
WDHIII WDHIII:
OPP OPP:
WDHIII WDHIII:
OPP OPP:
WDHIII WDHIII:
OPP OPP:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
OPP OPP:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
OPP OPP:
WDHIII WDHIII:
Ya know I brought this up the other day but its seems to have gone in one ear and out the other....
Your tongue in cheek "nomination" isnt fooling anyone and just goes to prove what we already know about you.
Youre an asshat.
$1:
Public complaint (including forum topics) regarding the moderation of this site, including the deletion of content or user suspension, is not acceptable. These issues are between the Moderators and the members involved. Concerns or complaints on Moderator decisions should be directed to the CKA Administration in a Private Message only.
Your tongue in cheek "nomination" isnt fooling anyone and just goes to prove what we already know about you.
Youre an asshat.
yeah.. But you'll have to prove it..
This is a serious nomination.
Run home from school?
Actually.. I did most of the kicking.. and I regret most of it.. that's why I cant stand bullies like you or WDHIII... or Regina. We all made some shity decitions which I today regret more than anything.
I know you know exactly what I'm talking about.. We're alittle faster.. alittle smarter... and a hellowa lot more meaner...
Nope..... sorry.
Ya know you you pull stupid shit like this, get your ass handed to ya and ya keep comin back for more..
You bring it on yourself.....
I guess I do... But remember WDHIII.. All those nasty little pm's you sent me.. there all here! 'ALL HERE! .... You're not an angel. You're worse than I am. You bullie people on a forum? 'Where's your
ethics? I know you've been through some.. ordeals.. thats no excuse? But I know exactly what you have done. I know the patterns and the behaviour all too well.
Bulling you? I sent you a PM with a 100 little rollie eyed smilies after you BITCHED AND COMPLAINED about my "over use" of them. THEN you went off in your reply...
I didnt BULLY... I RESPONDED in kind..... and my ETHICS are not in question here. YOU posted this nomination for one reason and one reason only.... to COMPLAIN ONCE AGAIN about the moderating and once again break forum rules.
The only person that believes this is a sincere nomination is YOU OPP. in that twisted little socialist mind of yours.
Your little fucking pity party is PATHETIC.
I didn't mean to upset you WDHIII. My intention was solely to make you realize that change Is hard but very, very rewarding. I just don't feel like being angry anymore. I've been angry most of my life and.. I'm tired of it. I hope you tire of it soon.. and find something else to focus on.
At the beginning of this topic I was very angry.. but now.. I feel I don't have to be.
fatbasturd @ Fri May 18, 2007 7:05 pm
OPP OPP:
WDHIII WDHIII:
OPP OPP:
WDHIII WDHIII:
OPP OPP:
WDHIII WDHIII:
OPP OPP:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
OPP OPP:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
OPP OPP:
WDHIII WDHIII:
Ya know I brought this up the other day but its seems to have gone in one ear and out the other....
Your tongue in cheek "nomination" isnt fooling anyone and just goes to prove what we already know about you.
Youre an asshat.
$1:
Public complaint (including forum topics) regarding the moderation of this site, including the deletion of content or user suspension, is not acceptable. These issues are between the Moderators and the members involved. Concerns or complaints on Moderator decisions should be directed to the CKA Administration in a Private Message only.
Your tongue in cheek "nomination" isnt fooling anyone and just goes to prove what we already know about you.
Youre an asshat.
yeah.. But you'll have to prove it..
This is a serious nomination.
Run home from school?
Actually.. I did most of the kicking.. and I regret most of it.. that's why I cant stand bullies like you or WDHIII... or Regina. We all made some shity decitions which I today regret more than anything.
I know you know exactly what I'm talking about.. We're alittle faster.. alittle smarter... and a hellowa lot more meaner...
Nope..... sorry.
Ya know you you pull stupid shit like this, get your ass handed to ya and ya keep comin back for more..
You bring it on yourself.....
I guess I do... But remember WDHIII.. All those nasty little pm's you sent me.. there all here! 'ALL HERE! .... You're not an angel. You're worse than I am. You bullie people on a forum? 'Where's your
ethics? I know you've been through some.. ordeals.. thats no excuse? But I know exactly what you have done. I know the patterns and the behaviour all too well.
Bulling you? I sent you a PM with a 100 little rollie eyed smilies after you BITCHED AND COMPLAINED about my "over use" of them. THEN you went off in your reply...
I didnt BULLY... I RESPONDED in kind..... and my ETHICS are not in question here. YOU posted this nomination for one reason and one reason only.... to COMPLAIN ONCE AGAIN about the moderating and once again break forum rules.
The only person that believes this is a sincere nomination is YOU OPP. in that twisted little socialist mind of yours.
Your little fucking pity party is PATHETIC.
I didn't mean to upset you WDHIII. My intention was solely to make you realize that change Is hard but very, very rewarding. I just don't feel like being angry anymore. I've been angry most of my life and.. I'm tired of it. I hope you tire of it soon.. and find something else to focus on.
At the beginning of this topic I was very angry.. but now.. I feel I don't have to be.
Regina @ Fri May 18, 2007 10:01 pm
Oh....Master DE-bator! 
No I couldn't possibly accept that medal. I've yet to school this simpleton at anything. In fact the total lack of understanding he's shown for the word debate, leads me to believe he should start taking his medication earlier in the day.
Thanks anyways Skippy.
Dayseed @ Sat May 19, 2007 3:23 am
Regina Regina:
Oh....Master DE-bator!
No I couldn't possibly accept that medal. I've yet to school this simpleton at anything. In fact the total lack of understanding he's shown for the word debate, leads me to believe he should start taking his medication earlier in the day.
Thanks anyways Skippy.
No I couldn't possibly accept that medal. I've yet to school this simpleton at anything. In fact the total lack of understanding he's shown for the word debate, leads me to believe he should start taking his medication earlier in the day.
Thanks anyways Skippy.
Yeah, but you have locked horns with the Holocaust deniers en masse when they swarmed historytelevision.ca THAT should be enough to get you the medal you so deserve.
kaetz @ Sat May 19, 2007 5:25 am
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Okay, yeah, I'm agreeing with you here, OPP. You did nothing agaisnt the rules except have a view. Why would Anti-Iraqism be permitted but Anti-Americanism disallowed?
It's like Allowing Anti-Canadianism but not Anti-Brazilism.
Good luck, friend.
It's like Allowing Anti-Canadianism but not Anti-Brazilism.
Good luck, friend.
the only worthy post here! a teeny beat you all daddies, when you tried to show off your balls at each other's faces!
btw, if a public complaint is not allowed, how can one draw public attention to the unfair judgments and decisions? when one would say "this mod is shit", the others would ask for the proofs/links. And it is normal. Or is it agaist the freedom of speech to touch "the untouchables"? PMs are not the way.
I personally never had an issue with moderating here, but i admit such a possibility for anybody. I guess this should be clarified...
Regina @ Sat May 19, 2007 9:40 am
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Okay, yeah, I'm agreeing with you here, OPP. You did nothing agaisnt the rules except have a view. Why would Anti-Iraqism be permitted but Anti-Americanism disallowed?
It's like Allowing Anti-Canadianism but not Anti-Brazilism.
Good luck, friend.
Just like the delusional monkey who started this thread, you've obviously never read the rules have you?
It's like Allowing Anti-Canadianism but not Anti-Brazilism.
Good luck, friend.
Regina @ Sat May 19, 2007 9:40 am
Dayseed Dayseed:
Regina Regina:
Oh....Master DE-bator!
No I couldn't possibly accept that medal. I've yet to school this simpleton at anything. In fact the total lack of understanding he's shown for the word debate, leads me to believe he should start taking his medication earlier in the day.
Thanks anyways Skippy.
No I couldn't possibly accept that medal. I've yet to school this simpleton at anything. In fact the total lack of understanding he's shown for the word debate, leads me to believe he should start taking his medication earlier in the day.
Thanks anyways Skippy.
Yeah, but you have locked horns with the Holocaust deniers en masse when they swarmed historytelevision.ca THAT should be enough to get you the medal you so deserve.
Tyler_1 @ Sat May 19, 2007 9:45 am
Congrats on your master bator medal Regina! 
(please don't kick us off the hill now )
wildrosegirl @ Sat May 19, 2007 9:47 am
DonnaWho DonnaWho:
Congrats on your master bator medal Regina!
(please don't kick us off the hill now )
(please don't kick us off the hill now )
I see our third cell mate!
kaetz @ Sat May 19, 2007 11:47 am
WDHIII WDHIII:
kaetz kaetz:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Okay, yeah, I'm agreeing with you here, OPP. You did nothing agaisnt the rules except have a view. Why would Anti-Iraqism be permitted but Anti-Americanism disallowed?
It's like Allowing Anti-Canadianism but not Anti-Brazilism.
Good luck, friend.
It's like Allowing Anti-Canadianism but not Anti-Brazilism.
Good luck, friend.
the only worthy post here! a teeny beat you all daddies, when you tried to show off your balls at each other's faces!
btw, if a public complaint is not allowed, how can one draw public attention to the unfair judgments and decisions? when one would say "this mod is shit", the others would ask for the proofs/links. And it is normal. Or is it agaist the freedom of speech to touch "the untouchables"? PMs are not the way.
I personally never had an issue with moderating here, but i admit such a possibility for anybody. I guess this should be clarified...
proper procedure is in the rules and OPP has ignored them TWICE now.
$1:
Public complaint (including forum topics) regarding the moderation of this site, including the deletion of content or user suspension, is not acceptable. These issues are between the Moderators and the members involved. Concerns or complaints on Moderator decisions should be directed to the CKA Administration in a Private Message only.
yes, thank you, i can read and i read it before.
But it looks like oligarchy. Imagine: my book was censored and what do i do? note, i cannot call for public attention! But there is a nice law: whisper my problem into Mr. Putin's ear, he'll negotiate the problem with some guys in power and issue their final decision! What would you say about Russia and it's political regime then?
i understand that if everybody starts to abuse the forum with their complaints over every stupid small thing, it will be annoying and to no use. But maybe it is better to try to work out some compromise mechanism? I'm no specialist in running a web-site/forum. But don't you see any sense in what i'm trying to tell?
OPP could probably try to re-phrase his complaint so that it would look like a posing of a new problem/question instead, but it would only be a cover-up.
... i dunno... in what he quoted i found nothing that would have deserved deleting... but i'm not a mod, maybe this is the point?
and i would rather advise to keep a closer eye on those members who who start personal attacks like calling others idiots and asshats! Why calling other guy an asshat is ok, but when it comes to the US it becomes tabu all out of the blue?
if some posts were off-topics... well... there are many off-topics here, so what? not all are deleted. If it is so much more off topic then the others, then people wouldn't reply to it. If they get mad about it and reply... well... we can always hand out one more "idiot" to them without being afraid to get a warning!
kaetz @ Sat May 19, 2007 12:09 pm
WDHIII WDHIII:
kaetz kaetz:
WDHIII WDHIII:
kaetz kaetz:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Okay, yeah, I'm agreeing with you here, OPP. You did nothing agaisnt the rules except have a view. Why would Anti-Iraqism be permitted but Anti-Americanism disallowed?
It's like Allowing Anti-Canadianism but not Anti-Brazilism.
Good luck, friend.
It's like Allowing Anti-Canadianism but not Anti-Brazilism.
Good luck, friend.
the only worthy post here! a teeny beat you all daddies, when you tried to show off your balls at each other's faces!
btw, if a public complaint is not allowed, how can one draw public attention to the unfair judgments and decisions? when one would say "this mod is shit", the others would ask for the proofs/links. And it is normal. Or is it agaist the freedom of speech to touch "the untouchables"? PMs are not the way.
I personally never had an issue with moderating here, but i admit such a possibility for anybody. I guess this should be clarified...
proper procedure is in the rules and OPP has ignored them TWICE now.
$1:
Public complaint (including forum topics) regarding the moderation of this site, including the deletion of content or user suspension, is not acceptable. These issues are between the Moderators and the members involved. Concerns or complaints on Moderator decisions should be directed to the CKA Administration in a Private Message only.
yes, thank you, i can read and i read it before.
But it looks like oligarchy. Imagine: my book was censored and what do i do? note, i cannot call for public attention! But there is a nice law: whisper my problem into Mr. Putin's ear, he'll negotiate the problem with some guys in power and issue their final decision! What would you say about Russia and it's political regime then?
i understand that if everybody starts to abuse the forum with their complaints over every stupid small thing, it will be annoying and to no use. But maybe it is better to try to work out some compromise mechanism? I'm no specialist in running a web-site/forum. But don't you see any sense in what i'm trying to tell?
OPP could probably try to re-phrase his complaint so that it would look like a posing of a new problem/question instead, but it would only be a cover-up.
... i dunno... in what he quoted i found nothing that would have deserved deleting... but i'm not a mod, maybe this is the point?
and i would rather advise to keep a closer eye on those members who who start personal attacks like calling others idiots and asshats! Why calling other guy an asshat is ok, but when it comes to the US it becomes tabu all out of the blue?
if some posts were off-topics... well... there are many off-topics here, so what? not all are deleted. If it is so much more off topic then the others, then people wouldn't reply to it. If they get mad about it and reply... well... we can always hand out one more "idiot" to them without being afraid to get a warning!
I think discussing it with Trev (site admin) IS the "compromise mechanism". Trev is one of the most level headed even handed guys Ive ever "met" (one has to be to run a site like this) and Im sure if he sees a discrepancy he will call a mod on it. Theres no need to draw "public attention" as you put it. If someone TRULY believes theyve been wronged and Trev disagrees my advice to them is quit yur bitchin and find another place to hang out.
Then theres THIS piece of trash....... nominating Regina to try to draw attention to the fact that hes been "mistreated"... just another in the long line of OPPs drivel.
Oh and for the record....
Hes STILL an ASSHAT.
i really really failed to find what deserved deleting in the posts he quoted. On the other hand, it is true that i have no idea if he tried to dscuss it with Trev and what was the result.
WDHIII WDHIII:
If someone TRULY believes theyve been wronged and Trev disagrees my advice to them is quit yur bitchin and find another place to hang out.
very true! but it becomes a discussion over the definitions then
and my off-topic final: you'll be the greatest ASSHAT here if you don't play my super-duper set on Monday!
Regina @ Sat May 19, 2007 12:21 pm
kaetz he was asked to stop posting inflammatory remarks that drive threads off topic and wouldn't stop. I bet there were more than a dozen of these PMs sent where in fact he should have had a warning. This is a privately owned site that does not guarantee censorship or free speech. There is only one person here who has the right to say what goes on and as WDHIII pointed out, he's one of the most laid back, easy going people there is around.
OPP isn't too bright and it's become clear he's not read the rules or has chose to ignore them. He sent Trevor a VERY long PM and got nowhere so now he's started a thread (again not allowed) to air his displeasure of the process he's yet to grasp.
kaetz @ Sat May 19, 2007 12:25 pm
what's this: PHP has encountered an Access Violation at 03837831 ????