no longer available
Dunno what you're doing wrong, it works fine for me.
Shouldn't this be under humour? And I use that term loosely. This is hardly a serious religious or moral topic.
Abusing religion for violent purposes is not a serious topic? What rock have you been living under since you were born? Just because he uses humour to punctuate his point doesn't make it any less valid a point.
It has everything to do with the morality of advocating violence for religious purposes or hiding behind your religion whenever your violence is called into question.
quite humourous.
I like the line, 'if she wants to wear a ring proving she's not having sex, she can get married just like the rest of us.'
Fucking. Beautiful.
that was good, hehe
But I am moving this to the humour forum.
wtf, mate.
Should religious people not have to confront the issue of violence, while many of them vocalise that it is their right? Humour aside, I think he makes many valid points that are not actually all that humourous.
Some religious types are pro-violence.
They are violent people, first and foremost looking for an excuse to vent their hatred. If not religion, they would find some other cause such as politics. Look how many millions of people died at the hands of totalitarian dictatatorships who claimed they were trying to bring about a secular utopia/paradise.
That was some fracking funny shit.