Is it ok to hate hindus?
they have just as much right to be hated as everyone else but no one has brought it up yet.
You forgot to add the poll.
Brenda @ Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:59 am
Man, can't we add all religions of the world? One long list of religions, and then say which we hate most? It will save a lot of forum-space 
kaetz @ Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:01 am
it's becoming boring here....................
kaetz kaetz:
it's becoming boring here....................
Rhetorical threads are stupid.
kaetz @ Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:10 am
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
kaetz kaetz:
it's becoming boring here....................
Rhetorical threads are stupid.
agree!
Regina @ Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:03 pm
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
kaetz kaetz:
it's becoming boring here....................
Rhetorical threads are stupid.
True and if they're made to start a pissing match those doing it will be asked to stop.....sooner than later.
tritium @ Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:09 pm
Someone lock this thread already.
New thread: Is it ok to hate stupid thread starters?
i think it's as valid a question as bart's. i'm sorry if i ruined all of your days by making you click on it and then respond. my deepest apologies.
tritium @ Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:23 pm
kathematics kathematics:
i think it's as valid a question as bart's. i'm sorry if i ruined all of your days by making you click on it and then respond. my deepest apologies.
Well if you ask me, time to abolish Christianity, which all other religions are based on.
So if Jesus was not crucified but lived, Mary Magdalene is the mother of his children and they escaped to France.
Then all other religions, such as Islam, Mormons would be based on a lie. Shake the foundations of the Catholic church and everyone who believed and died for a lie. No virgins, no pearl gates.
The problem is, our laws are based on Judeo Christianity, thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal...
The Da vinci code
QBC @ Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:34 pm
What is with all this, "is it ok to hate ________"
kathematics kathematics:
i think it's as valid a question as bart's. i'm sorry if i ruined all of your days by making you click on it and then respond. my deepest apologies.
There is no intent on your part to have a discussion on this matter - you posted it solely in response to Bart's thread.
You're being a pain throughout this site intentionally.
kathematics kathematics:
i think it's as valid a question as bart's. i'm sorry if i ruined all of your days by making you click on it and then respond. my deepest apologies.
Bart's question is perfectly fair. In Canada, both governments and liberally minded people have made an absolute mockery of freedom of religion and have judicially attacked everything from biblical verses to Christmas trees. There are hundreds of examples of these liberals hypocritically attacking Christians and their organisations while ignoring Muslims on issues with mutual concurrence. You also have to understand that perhaps not all Muslims are terrorists but almost all terrorists are Muslim and it is that inescapable fact of life that cause so much consternation when trying to determine the role in Canadian society of the Islamic extremists of which we seem to import so many of.
You may think you are clever using the relatively peaceful Hindu to highlight what you believe is a religious double standard but I’d take 10 Hindu immigrants unchecked over one Muslim from Europe whose file has been gone through with a fine tooth comb and I’ll bet dollars to donuts most of us so labelled ‘racists’ feel the same way.
In other words, this is what we call separating the wheat from the chaff.
the inescapable fact that almost all terrorists are muslim?
thats a pretty freakin bold statement there. do you have some numbers and references for that?
whose definition of 'terrorist' are we using? i bet if you asked the japanese who they identified as terrorists, they might not immeadiately say 'muslims'
back it up, grain. or your post is a joke
kathematics kathematics:
the inescapable fact that almost all terrorists are muslim?
thats a pretty freakin bold statement there. do you have some numbers and references for that?
whose definition of 'terrorist' are we using? i bet if you asked the japanese who they identified as terrorists, they might not immeadiately say 'muslims'
back it up, grain. or your post is a joke
Blah blah blah. Save the wounded Islamist outrage for someone else. I'm just quoting Muslims themselves:
"It is a certain fact that not all Muslims are terrorists, but it is equally certain, and exceptionally painful, that almost all terrorists are Muslims." - Abdel Rahman al-Rashed, Muslim GM of the Al-Arabiya news channel