Queer Comics Siezed by CCRA Border Guards
Clogeroo @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:54 pm
$1:
This = Hot:
That isn't right.
Tricks @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:55 pm
Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
This = Hot:
That isn't right.
TattoodGirl @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:55 pm
Brenda Brenda:
That is the strangest thing about it: pictures of 2 women kissing and making out seems to be no problem, but 2 men is gross...
I find both gross as well....just dont get either myself, but whatever turns people on I guess thats their thing. I dont believe it should be censored, I just steer clear of the ff and mm shit.
Clogeroo @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:57 pm
$1:
Ok I have to make a poll of this. Survey time.
Tricks @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:57 pm
Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
Ok I have to make a poll of this. Survey time.
TattoodGirl @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:58 pm
Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
Ok I have to make a poll of this. Survey time.
I with ya on that Clog....
Clogeroo @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:59 pm
$1:
well we know your answer.
Why do you like it though? It looks freaky.
Tricks @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:02 pm
Clogeroo Clogeroo:
$1:
well we know your answer.
Why do you like it though? It looks freaky.
novachick @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:04 pm
I know girl on girl is every guy's fantasy ......but when it comes to fine dining.....I prefer it to mean a restraunt and food.....my vote
Clogeroo @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:08 pm
$1:
I dunno...
Hmm I guess some people have tendencies more than others. To me they look like some mythological creatures or something you would see in Dante’s hell.
Clogeroo @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:13 pm
$1:
I know girl on girl is every guy's fantasy .....
Not mine.
toothpick @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:43 pm
Siezing said comics is a joke, since they're already flowing through a gigantic hole in the border known to some as "the internet".
Aside from that, they're a work of fiction so the govornment has no business siezing them or limiting them in any way.
As for the incest part. If it bothers you that someone would write a story with that in it, I suggest you never mistakenly pick up this at your local video store.
This is apparenly a case of someone at customs going "Ewwwww, gross. I don't like that, so it *must* be against the law."
neopundit @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:51 pm
toothpick toothpick:
This is apparenly a case of someone at customs going "Ewwwww, gross. I don't like that, so it *must* be against the law."
Exactly. I'll bet that most of the people calling for the censoring of these comics were some of the first to scream for free speech when the Danish cartoons depicting Mohamed were essentially censored worldwide. That's usually how the morality police work.
Knoss @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:53 pm
$1:
Well, although I agree that censorship of this type is wrong, and that people should be able to express themselves as they wish so long as they are not inciting hatred, I do not agree with the medium in this instance, as I have always felt that comic books are targeting children. Although I suppose, it is a step up from a pop-up book
you know it's people like you who killed the comic book as a medium
sandorski @ Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:27 pm
More Gay threads from GrainFed. Does this excite you: ![[but]](./images/smilies/bootie.gif "Moon")