Historic Global Temperature Drop Predicted
http://www.spaceandscience.net/id16.html
$1:
Historic Global Temperature Drop Predicted
Thursday, November 20, 2014 Press Release 4-2014
3:00 PM
The Space and Science Research Corporation (SSRC) announces today an important set of climate change predictions dealing with the coming cold climate epoch that will dominate global temperatures for the next thirty years.
According to analysis of the most reliable solar activity trends and climate models based on the Relational Cycle Theory (RC Theory), the SSRC concludes the following:
1. The Earth is about to begin a steep drop in global temperatures off its present global temperature plateau. This plateau has been caused by the absence of growth in global temperatures for 18 years, the start of global cooling in the atmosphere and the oceans, and the end of a short period of moderate solar heating from an unusually active secondary peak in solar cycle #24.
2. Average global atmospheric and oceanic temperatures will drop significantly beginning between 2015 and 2016 and will continue with only temporary reversals until they stabilize during a long cold temperature base lasting most of the 2030's and 2040's. The bottom of the next global cold climate caused by a "solar hibernation" (a pronounced reduction in warming energy coming from the Sun) is expected to be reached by the year 2031.
3. The predicted temperature decline will continue for the next fifteen years and will likely be the steepest ever recorded in human history, discounting past short-duration volcanic events.
4. Global average temperatures during the 2030's will reach a level of at least 1.5° C lower than the peak temperature year of the past 100 years established in 1998. The temperatures during the 2030's will correspond roughly to that observed from 1793 to 1830, shortly after the founding of the United States of America. This average lower global temperature of 1.5° C on average, translates to declines in temperatures that will be devastating for crop growing regions in the mid latitudes of the planet.
Just remember: The reason why it's so cold is because it's so hot!
Lemmy @ Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:34 am
...says almost no one. But, seeing as it's hotter than it's ever been, I suppose the cooling must be coming.
http://www.weather.com/science/environment/news/2014-record-hot
DrCaleb @ Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:53 am
This should be in 'Jokes', not 'Science and Technology'.
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
This should be in 'Jokes', not 'Science and Technology'.
Their theories are just as theoretical as anyone else's.
DrCaleb @ Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:58 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
This should be in 'Jokes', not 'Science and Technology'.
Their theories are just as theoretical as anyone else's.
Not even a little. Climate predictions come from huge volumes of data using the best models we know about on insanely expensive supercomputers. Not from websites no one has ever heard of, through a press release.
Here's some 'science' that is just as theoretically correct as the real kind, right?
$1:
Global warming causes last of Dali clocks to melt
A wealth of statistical evidence has impelled scientists at Columbia University to blame man-made climate change on the liquefication of the final clock in Salvadore Dali’s renowned work “The Persistence of Memory.”
“When the painting was first completed in 1931, it is believed that all clocks therein were completely solid and circular,” said atmospheric science professor Michela Biasutti. “Now all four of the timepieces are entirely molten, and we have strong evidence to suggest that anthropogenic climate change is the culprit.”
Researchers in Biasutti’s group warn that, if nothing is done to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the celestial objects in Van Gogh’s “Starry Night” might eventually become “obscured by thick smog,” and that the subject in Da Vinci’s “Mona Lisa” may begin to “stop smiling.” They point to other alarming meteoro-aesthetic trends, such as the hard-boiling of nearly a dozen Fabergé eggs and the disrobing of Lady Liberty to urge politicians to implement sound environmental policies and avert an international catastrophe.
http://www.thebeaverton.com/world/item/ ... ks-to-melt
raydan @ Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:07 pm
Space and Science Research Corporation is essentially a single issue think tank, in the business of getting paid to come up with scientific-sounding justifications for any anti-global-warming message the customer wants to get across.
DrCaleb @ Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:16 pm
raydan raydan:
Space and Science Research Corporation is essentially a single issue think tank, in the business of getting paid to come up with scientific-sounding justifications for any anti-global-warming message the customer wants to get across.
^^ And there are many 'research' companies out there that will create a 'study' that will say anything you want them to say.
Unless you want to get it published in a respected science journal, however.
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
raydan raydan:
Space and Science Research Corporation is essentially a single issue think tank, in the business of getting paid to come up with scientific-sounding justifications for any anti-global-warming message the customer wants to get across.
^^ And there are many 'research' companies out there that will create a 'study' that will say anything you want them to say.
Unless you want to get it published in a respected science journal, however.
Not so fast, Sparky.
Those 'respected' journals of yours are not beyond publishing outright gibberish from their paid subscribers:
http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-w ... rs-1.14763
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
raydan raydan:
Space and Science Research Corporation is essentially a single issue think tank, in the business of getting paid to come up with scientific-sounding justifications for any anti-global-warming message the customer wants to get across.
^^ And there are many 'research' companies out there that will create a 'study' that will say anything you want them to say.
Unless you want to get it published in a respected science journal, however.
Not so fast, Sparky.
Those 'respected' journals of yours are not beyond publishing outright gibberish from their paid subscribers:
http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-w ... rs-1.14763Indeed. The things people do for money. But science comes back and fixes the error it originally created. People lose their careers for things like the fake study that linked vaccination to Autism in kids.
The difference between the Global Warming and Global Cooling crowd is the sheer number of peer reviewed articles for one, over the other. And the difference between "Space and Science Research Institute" and people who submit fake studies; is one published article.
http://www.vox.com/2014/11/21/7259207/s ... paper-scam
Delwin @ Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:12 pm
Wow scaping the bottom of the barrel, this was dicredited 4 and 1/2 years ago when it was originally published.
Slow news day ?
Hoft runs with global cooling "warning" from "scam artist"
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2010/05/15 ... cam/164798
Delwin @ Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:24 pm
Why not just create your own peer-reviewed climate science organization Bart, it's not like you need credentials or anything ? The sky is the limit; global cooling, plagues of locusts, raining frogs, let's get a little creative with it 
Delwin Delwin:
Why not just create your own peer-reviewed climate science organization Bart, it's not like you need credentials or anything ? The sky is the limit; global cooling, plagues of locusts, raining frogs, let's get a little creative with it

$1:
Sarah Palin Claims Global Warming Will ‘Bring Back the Dinosaurs’
http://dailycurrant.com/2013/06/26/sara ... dinosaurs/
Thanos @ Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:31 pm
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
Bitchin'!
raydan @ Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:39 pm
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
Sarah Palin Sarah Palin:
"But the truth is, life was pretty good millions of years ago."
Of course it was, no Sarah Palin.
Regina @ Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:56 pm
Just shows you that anyone can start a web site. That, a PO Box and phone number. 